Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for taking your time and helping me on this. Would you recommend I also send a letter tomorrow to both BMW and Motonovo?
    • she and  johnson need to be kicked off the taxpayers credit card - for starters I'm certain there is cause - taking up 'jobs' when they shouldn't, bringing the nation into disrepute with their antics .. I'm sure it would be a very popular act from a new labour guv
    • Please have a look at this draft letter. It is modelled on yours but I have cut out a load of the unnecessary information. Also, the responsibility lies with the finance company because the vehicle was brought on hire purchase. You send it to them and a copy to big motoring world.   Let us know if there's anything that you disagree with, which is wrong, which you think should be added
    • According to Alastair Campbell on Twitter, anti-Le Pen parties are pointing to RN's fiscal policies and saying they'll cause a 'Truss-style market meltdown'. Liz Truss charged taxpayers for Amazon Prime subscription - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK The subscription costing £95 gives the ex-PM free shipping from the retail giant, as well as the ability to stream films and TV shows such as My Fault...  
    • Thank-you @BankFodder, your statement is a correct understanding of my position and I agree, it is actually really what I was looking for in starting this thread, as I too believed that the maximum I could claim for is that which I sold it for, even though this was substantially below market value at the time. And so, this sold value is what I shall be claiming for + the other expenses. @dx100uk I get your point, but this is just not what I want to expose myself to. Unfortunately I was one of the unlucky ones to have my details stolen in the Peoples Energy hack, and in 2020 I discovered that those details had been used to take out car insurance, and that the insured was then involved in a collision and my details were dragged through the mud. Despite Aviva cancelling the claim and treating as though it never were, even though I have the letters from them to say that they have removed this claim from the insurance database, I still get refused insurance and credit products to this day until I send across the letter from Aviva which explains that I was a victim of fraud. So you'll forgive me for not jumping up and uploading my data to a server utility for which I have no control over its retention policy, or where the server is located globally, its legal jurisdiction, or its security protocols.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Able Group Plumbing Work Help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3396 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Life is full of issues and only this forum eases the pain:)

 

Here's my problem:

 

Back at the end of December 2012, i had a pipe burst in the bathroom, at which i called the Able Group emergency number and booked a plumber to come and fix the burst pipe.

The plumber arrived within 2 hrs, saw to the problem, replaced a plastic fitting, paid him £150 through credit card.

Everything was fine up to today when the same problem happened again. Switched off the mains water supply and on closer look the same fitting as per plumber failed.

So rang Able Group, spoke to a customer services advisor confirming my case and what had happened. The response i got was to wait in all day, and that i would receive i phonecall confirming the attendance of the plumber to assess the situation and if at fault will be fixed free.

Now that conversation took place at 9am and its now 8pm and no further calls or communication took place.

Naturally i am fuming as i have been home almost all day with no water and had to resort to friends and water bottles.I do not know what my legal options are:

 

So what is/are your advice?

 

a) Request chargeback and re-book a plumber from somewhere else

b) Ring Able Group and complain + complain to the Trading Standards

 

Any help ideas are welcome (and sorry if the above is long winded)

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

£150 for a plastic fitting!! You will probably do better in future to use a local plummer rather than a big firm

 

sounds like you need to get it sorted soon you would expect the repair to last longer than it has, maby there is other issues as it is the second time

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since my last post, i made a complaint to the Trading Standards and started a chargeback (section 75) through my Credit Card using the pretext of goods/services haven't lasted a reasonable amount of time and it all looks positively good.

 

Thanks for the comments, and if it was easy to find any local plumber that would attend within the day (not couple hrs) i would have opted for the option...Instead it takes an average of three days to get a plumber in this area and i couldn't go for so long without water.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you get a receipt/invoice from them when you paid? It should have terms and conditions on the back, and any guarantees that come with the work. It should be down to Able Group to send out the original plumber to fix the problem, but this is not going to happen.

I would personally take the money back, call out another company, making sure they were local and independent, get the problem fixed and ask the plumber to write on the invoice the exact problem and that the original work was not up to standard.

 

When ever calling out a tradesman, make sure when you phone that you are talking to the person who will be coming out to do the work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you get a receipt/invoice from them when you paid? It should have terms and conditions on the back, and any guarantees that come with the work. It should be down to Able Group to send out the original plumber to fix the problem, but this is not going to happen.

I would personally take the money back, call out another company, making sure they were local and independent, get the problem fixed and ask the plumber to write on the invoice the exact problem and that the original work was not up to standard.

 

When ever calling out a tradesman, make sure when you phone that you are talking to the person who will be coming out to do the work.

 

Thanks for your advise.

 

I got the independent local plumber to confirm in writing that the fitting was a used fitting and was supposed to ladt at least a couple of years.On the Able Group recript's terms and conditions there is no mention of any garranties or warranties the whole text reads as the byer is responsible even if the plumber damages the property. I cant believe what I'm reading.

 

I never agreed to this? Can they gey away with such bogus bold statements?

From what I understand they claim to accept no liability or responsibility.

Shocking my credit card company will have a field day lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

This does not surprise me at all about Able Group. I am a tradesman and have heard all sorts of stuff about this outfit on certain forums I use, most of it from sub-contractors!

 

I would take this up with your local trading standards regarding their Ts&Cs and to report their shoddy workmanship. This will give you something to go at them with, if it does come back to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

I recently used able group to fit a new lock to my patio door,the engineer couldn't fit a new lock,he ended up breaking the existing lock and charging me £80. After he had gone we noticed he had broken the handle on our porch door( a door that was fine before and hadn't needed any work) I informed able who were absolutely awful,really rude,they want to charge me £70 to mend a door they broke!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Interesting to see the comments on Able Group.

My daughter is in a flat in London. We had a problem with the flush and I contacted Able.

They arranged for someone to visit a couple of days later. He spent 10 mins in the flat and said that he needed a part. We paid £72 plus VAT for this 10 mins.

Two weeks later and in spite of my daughter calling a couple of times we had not been contacted by the plumber so I chased Able. They said they would call me back. They didn't. I chased again and was then told that the plumber's van is off the road. Fine, but why did he just leave us not knowing what the position. I find that hopeless.

I have chased Able again and have now been told that the plumber believes that we need a new cistern and the charge will be £150 for a new cistern and up to £140 to fit it (up to 1.5 hours). When he left my daughter he said the cost would be £60!

Needless to say, I'm not using Able to do the work!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting to see the comments on Able Group.

My daughter is in a flat in London. We had a problem with the flush and I contacted Able.

They arranged for someone to visit a couple of days later. He spent 10 mins in the flat and said that he needed a part. We paid £72 plus VAT for this 10 mins.

Two weeks later and in spite of my daughter calling a couple of times we had not been contacted by the plumber so I chased Able. They said they would call me back. They didn't. I chased again and was then told that the plumber's van is off the road. Fine, but why did he just leave us not knowing what the position. I find that hopeless.

I have chased Able again and have now been told that the plumber believes that we need a new cistern and the charge will be £150 for a new cistern and up to £140 to fit it (up to 1.5 hours). When he left my daughter he said the cost would be £60!

Needless to say, I'm not using Able to do the work!

 

Nearly a 2 year old thread

 

Perhaps you should start a new thread

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
Interesting to see the comments on Able Group.

My daughter is in a flat in London. We had a problem with the flush and I contacted Able.

They arranged for someone to visit a couple of days later. He spent 10 mins in the flat and said that he needed a part. We paid £72 plus VAT for this 10 mins.

Two weeks later and in spite of my daughter calling a couple of times we had not been contacted by the plumber so I chased Able. They said they would call me back. They didn't. I chased again and was then told that the plumber's van is off the road. Fine, but why did he just leave us not knowing what the position. I find that hopeless.

I have chased Able again and have now been told that the plumber believes that we need a new cistern and the charge will be £150 for a new cistern and up to £140 to fit it (up to 1.5 hours). When he left my daughter he said the cost would be £60!

Needless to say, I'm not using Able to do the work!

 

I think that there is basis here for claiming from the company. I am quite sure that a judge would accept that the the payment was in fact an initial payment in a larger contract to return and finish the job and then charge the full price .

 

I think that it needs a letter terminating the contract and asking for a refund giving 14 days if this does not happen. I estimate chances of success in court at better than 95%.

Chances that they would settle before trial - better than 80%

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...