Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles.
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Claim Form DLC/Hillies old-MBNA credit card *** Settled by Tomlin Order***


Alloyz1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3682 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

sounds good, if you're happy, and better if they will accept a plan (they didn't say whether it had to be a lump sum?)

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 301
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Okay, thank you for the comments as always

 

I want a F&F settlement with no admittance of liability, no court order and a payment plan.

 

Is it as simple as negotiating this including a discontinuance; or does it have to go to court?

 

Can it go to court and the court orders a no liability order? (is there even such a thing :) )

 

Is it safer to actually go through the court for this settlement?

 

Too many questions... I know.. but I appreciate all the feedback.

 

A

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, thank you for the comments as always

 

I want a F&F settlement with no admittance of liability, no court order and a payment plan.Tomlin Order or Consent then

 

Is it as simple as negotiating this including a discontinuance; or does it have to go to court? If you go with the above the claim is stayed...you wont get a discontinuance...its already in court

 

Can it go to court and the court orders a no liability order? (is there even such a thing :) ) No such thing

 

Is it safer to actually go through the court for this settlement? The Tomlin Order or Consent is sealed by the court

 

Too many questions... I know.. but I appreciate all the feedback.

 

A

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy

 

One last thing (hopefully)

 

If I get a settlement with a payment plan, through court, is it admittance and therefore I get a ccj or is it classed as something else with no negative record ( as long as payment is made)??

 

A

Link to post
Share on other sites

No its an agreement to halt litigation...the claim is stayed until (if) you breach the terms of the Tomlin Order then judgment is applied (if thats in the terms of the schedule)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

All clear Andy thanks.

 

Read up on TO as well so understand where I need to take this.

 

Will be asking for a TO, payment plan and a reduction of their offer settlement sum.

 

I think the Strike Out request has shaken them along with the WS they say they have not recieved.

 

Well thats my theory anyway!!

 

Thanks for your help as always everyone and I will let you know how we progress this.

 

A

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy

 

I am sending them a proposal settlement today and will set out my terms (it will give me an indication of how shaky they think the ground is under their case now- or just how kean they are to get rid of me!!).

 

If they agree (or we negotiate to an agreement) to a TO, I understand a schedule and order is drafted. Would you be able to look over it for me if I draw it up?

 

Appreciated as always

 

A

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can propose a TO but its the claimant that drafts the schedule (initially) you can agree or disagree and add input though. Dont post any details of the schedule here Alloyz as the terms of the schedule are private and that in its self would be a breach.:wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Negotiations ongoing

 

Started with their demand at £14'000 plus, then £5'000 now £4'500 now.

 

I have shown willing increased my offers £2'700, £3'000 and now £3'250 with TO.

 

Hopefully agree shortly and sealed by court.

 

Would there be a cost implication in all this or could I/ should I mention that as part of my negotiations?

 

A

Link to post
Share on other sites

The defendant may be expected to meet the cost of the TO £40....but you should be requesting that parties stand their costs in the case so far.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick update and I am aware they are probably tuned in to this thread!

 

Negotiations stuck! They have dug their heals in and are not prepared to negotiate any further.

 

I will await a trial date for the set aside and strike out, which they have stated they will not oppose the set aside but will defend the strike out

 

A

Link to post
Share on other sites

The hearing on 1st Oct is the set aside hearing, which they have said they will not object to, but will object to the strike out.

 

So I presume there will be a separate hearing for the original claim if it is set aside?

 

It would be great to settle it before, because of some of the stories I've read!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...