Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Mis sold legal & general mortgage insurances through a financial advisor at kinleigh folkard & hayward


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3771 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have a few areas where I need some advice.

 

I was a FTB in 2006 when my sister & I bought our first flat. I am a hairdresser & my sister is a project manager. We still live in the same property. We bought our Legal & General insurance policies & our Northern Rock mortgage through a Financial Advisor who was working at Kinleigh Folkard & Hayward. It was face to face & not over the internet or telephone. There are a few points I'm concerned about & need a bit of advice of where we stand.

 

I've just been having a look through all of our insurance policies & have noticed that we are doubled up on a few of the insurance policies. We both have separate policies for DECREASING TERM ASSURANCE WITH CRITICAL ILLNESS and MORTGAGE PAYMENT INSURANCE (2 each). I also have a policy for MORTGAGE PAYMENT PROTECTION INSURANCE because my sick pay is not as good as my sisters. From my understanding of talking to a few people is that we should have a joint policy which would be more cost effective? I have a deferred period of 52 weeks on my Mortgage Payment Insurance so I was told I needed the the Mortgage Payment Protection Insurance because the deferred period is 60 days ... But ... if i can't work because of any injury to my hands, tendons or muscles because of a work related cause or any mental issue arising from it they won't pay a claim. I have no recollection of this clause being explained to me as I'm sure I wouldn't have agreed to that. Also some of the details are wrong on my Mortgage Payment Insurance policy ... The type of work, hours worked & it says I haven't been in continuous work for the previous 36 months (which I had) and on the Mortgage Payment Protection Insurance policy the information is correct. I know this is my fault for not checking after I got all the paperwork. I'm going to phone L & G today to tell them so that it can be amended. We were also told not to request to have a look at our medical reports before they were sent to L & G as this would slow things down. Looking at the part of the policy that details how much the advice costs there is an initial lump sum but then after month 49 there is a £1.09, £.40, £0.99 & £0.43 amount that it will cost until the end of the policy? Is that why were sold 5 individual policies when joint one would have been better?

 

He also organised our mortgage through Northern Rock. We had a little deposit (7%) which he advised us to keep to do some DIY & rather get a 114% mortgage on an interest only fixed rate for 5 years. £184 000 which was a mortgage & £30 000 of which was an unsecured loan.

 

 

I would like to know if I have a leg to stand on as I feel we have been ill advised. Any advice would be greatly appreciated

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi, just noticed your thread there now.My wife and I to took out a mortgage with Northern rock and life insurances from L&G from a broker(The mortgage shop) in derry n ireland in 2007.Well i say took out a mortgage, i was pretty much told this was the only option available to us for a mortgage otherwise we where snookered. I have just looked through all the old letters from The mortgage shop, L&G and Northern rock from the time and i to believe we where mi sold a few insurances.... Mortgage decreasing term assurance x2...Mortgage decreasing term assurance with critical illness cover x 2. Mortgage payment protection insurance x 2. The main reason i believe these where mis soled was because we where not given a chose to look elsewhere for any of the insurances mentioned and because i believe that the first 2 mentioned are 1 of the same thing.. Any how, you where asking who to approach. Last wednesday i sent an email of complaint to L&G in reguards to what i just wrote above and on friday they phoned me asking for more information about my complaint. The guy on the phone sounded genuine enough and said he will be in contact with the mortgage shop to find out from them how they came to advice me to have all of the policys. This is the actual email i sent to legal and general if you want to check it out ................. I wish to make a complaint reguarding several insurance policies i believe was mis sold to me when i was taking out a mortgage with northern rock in 2007, My name is ......my address at the time was..... L,derry,northern ireland. Bt...... I believe at the time my wife and me where not properly advised about what options where available in regards to life insurance policy's and mortgage ppi payments by the mortgage adviser for The mortgage shop,Derry who was working on behalf of Northern Rock. I wish therefore to make yous aware that i believe i have been mis soled quite a few insurance policy's at the time because we where not properly advised and we where pretty much told at the time this is what we had to do to be accepted for the mortgage from northern rock.

I would also like you to check each of the policys because i believe i had been paying far to much. I have in front of me a sheet telling me what payments that where due and what cover they where for.1 of the payments was for Mortgage Decreasing Term Assurance for myself which was paid monthly at £. There is also payment for Mortgage Decreasing Term Assurance with critical illness cover paid monthly at £. I believe they are both one of the same payment? There is also the same two payments for my wife again for two different amounts each month. Again i do believe the policys where for the same thing.. My mobile phone is 07..........,as i am no longer at the above address i would like yous to phone me first to arrange correspondence. Thanks for you time........ I will be looking closely at your thread to see how you get on... cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mick

 

THanks for your response. I've phoned L & G and explained that I had a complaint & they said I need to contact Kinleigh, Folkard & Hayward & make a complaint to them first ... I've sent them an email but have had no response as yet .... I'll keep you updated with this thread as to how I get on. If I don't get any response from KFH then I'll be going through L & G.

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Hi,

 

I'm a little late to this thread but I had the same experience with my first mortgage, taken out with Northern Rock and sold via KFH back in 2005.

 

The Mortgage Advisor at KFH said I had to take out Mortgage Protection Insurance (MPPI) and Mortgage Decreasing Term Assurance with Critical Illness Cover. Both policies were offered via Legal & General, and I was told that I had to take them in order to take out the Northern Rock mortgage.

 

I have paperwork (Northern Rock Loan Offer) that shows that Northern Rock were paid £732 by Legal & General when I took the mortgage so its clear to me that Northern Rock were miss-selling the insurance through L&G. However, it doesn't state on the Mortgage Offer that I had to take out these additional policies. It does state it on the Financial Advisor's Key Facts documentation that they should be, and I was definitely told I needed them. I'm in no doubt that it was mis-sold, and as a first time buyer I was completely unaware of what I was signing up to.

 

I have started a claim directly with Northern Rock for the MPPI but was unsure whether the to do so for the Decreasing Term Assurance.

 

Have you made any claims, and if so who with?

 

Many thanks,

 

Esther

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...