Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later the your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. So if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place and park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and then unload the children followed by reloading the children getting seat belts on etc before driving to the exit stopping for cars, pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
    • New version after LFI's superb analysis of the contract. Sorry, but you need to redo the numbering of the paras and of the exhibits in the right order after all the damage I've caused! Defendant's WS - version 4.pdf
    • Hi  no nothing yet. Hope it stays that way 😬
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4152 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I'd be grateful if anyone could help me. I went into my bank (HSBC) and a lady in there confirmed that I had PPI on both an old 'flexi' loan and also an old HSBC credit card. I sent off the SAR's and can't see anywhere that I do or I don't. On another worrying note, the bank said as they have

 

'assumed my request for information is likely to obtaining details of PPU held with HSBC, I can confirm that I have found no record of any PPI being attached to any loan with HSBC'

 

I beleive that they are (surprise surprise) lying!

 

So, shall I just send off the questionnairre complaint anyway? Why should I say it was misold?

 

Would really appreciate any help/advice,

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly a lot of lenders are making assumptions as to what a SAR is for and they may well try and confound you by telling you you did not have PPI when in fact you did. This ploy would tend to put people off and tus get the bank out of paying up.

 

When you sent your SAR, did you add a line that said it is to include copies of the agreements?

 

Do you have copies of the agreements at all?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi- many thanks for replying- I didn't think anyone had so apologies for the late reply.

 

The letter I sent was:

 

I understand that you currently hold details of my personal and financial information within your internal record systems with regard to personal loan accounts and credit cards accounts. I would be grateful if you would provide the following regarding payment protection insurance held for the following two accounts only:

1. Settled flexi loan account xxxxx

2. Credit Card account xxxxxx

-Full copies of all contracts which you believe exist or have existed between myself and your organisation from these two accounts , including true copies of any documents you hold in support of the same. This includes application forms/requests for services.

-A complete list of all transactions or statements relating to both of these accounts with your organisation.

-Copies of all documents which include any of my personal information including copies of any contacts or invoices, emails or computer records containing my personal information, or any records which pertain to this information.

-Full copies or transcripts of any correspondence in postal, email or any other format which you have entered into with any individual, organization or third party which contains my personal or financial, or which pertains to me.

Where any previous information or records held have been deleted or disposed of, the methods used to do so, including dates, certificates or references confirming details of destruction. Where you are unable to provide such certificates, please provide a declaration, signed by an authorised officer of your company, confirming the dates and methods of destruction of this data.

-Full hard copy print outs of my personal or financial information, held in a digital, magnetic or any other format which is held in any archives, backups or other storage devices / locations.

-Underwriting sheet or other such document recording any commission (or other) payment made to an intermediary or packager, and/or payment/commission from the insurer in relation to my accounts.

Where you have used abbreviations and/or codes, I would request that an accompanying sheet be provided so as to translate these abbreviations and/or codes and their meanings, I also request an accompanying appendices of the documents included and reference to the purpose or meaning to those documents.

I request that you provide all the information requested above, even though you may consider that it falls outside Data Protection.

I reserve the right to refer to the contents of this letter if an application for pre-action discovery is necessary relating to any of the documents requested herein.

I enclose a cheque in the sum of £10 to cover your fee.

IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO DEAL WITH THIS REQUEST, YOU SHOULD IMMEDIATELY FORWARD IT TO THE PERSON WITHIN YOUR ORGANISATION RESPONSIBLE FOR DATA PROTECTION.

I look forward to hearing from you in the first instance of receipt.

 

 

 

They have not sent copis of any agreement held through PPI and advised to write to a seperate department quote'a seperate legal entity to HSBC bank plc and you will need to write to the correct data contoller enclosing the £10 fee'

 

I did do this some months ago and have now not heard anything from them.

 

I guess I'll have to send another letter to the 'insurance services' with another £10 cheque!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You do not need to write again for a SAR...if you have sent the SAR to the bank that holds your data, i.e. HSBC then that is good enough.

 

If their 40 days are up then you could either lodge a complaint with the ICO to get them to force the bank to comply or you can issue in the courts to force compliance.

 

I would write to the bank again telling them that they have failed to comply with your SAR, a request made under the Data Protection Act, and therefore they are in breach of that Act.

 

Tell them that they now have 14 days to comply, failing which you will be lodging a complaint with the ICO and issuing proceedings through the courts to force compliance.

 

Head the letter "Letter Before Action" and send it to their registered office by recorded delivery. Address it to the Data Controller.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice- they havenow sent all copies of records and the like but no PPI information- they are insistant upon me writing to a seperate data controller from their insurance section regarding PPI. Are they therefore still in breach of failing to comply with my SAR or shall I write something different? Losing the will here as it seems so ardous and it's like pulling teeth with them! :-(

 

Many thanks for your advice!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. Right, I've got the PPI for CCard and transactions which prove that I had that. Past tense- it seems to have been applied for a period of 2 years then stopped? I have no documentation or recollection of why that is......................

Interestingly the so called agreement does not have either my signature or anything else on it- it's just a generic copy. No tick in the PPI box either? Bit stumped there.

 

Flexi loan is a lot more sketchy- I have some simple print out of a 'Customer Data Utility' from HSBC inhouse computer system- looks like something from the dark ages- very very basic information such as product number, date opened(1996) and 'unknown' under date closed. Last update date 2002. NO payment history nor agreements. I know this was closed years ago but without detailed information it makes things difficult to say the least!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so the credit card you have all you need to out in a claim. It clearly shows on the statements and the copy of the "agreement" they sent to you shows that you didn't request the PPI. When you put in your claim they may suggest that you took it out over the phone or some other nonsense in which case they would have to prove that.

 

With the loan, it may well be that they don't have data on the account if it was closed more than six years ago because they are not required to keep data on closed accounts for longer than that.

 

You said that a person in the bank confirmed that PPI was on this flexi loan so it may be worth popping back to the branch and investigating it further. See if you can get a print out from them of what they see which confirms PPI was on the loan.

  • Confused 1

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...