Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Instructed to start a new topic. My Debt has also transferred to J&P,  I was getting letters to my previous address from IDR which stopped - i still have access to the adress but its not where i live, there a letter on the way to Dubai confirming my current address as advised above. 4 weeks ago out of the blue i get a text regarding credit card debt and to call a number, ignored the message, the next day i get a letter from J&P to my current address. A couple of weeks in a row i get the same text and again a letter. They have managed to get my current phone number and address. I have just received a phone call from 07441 362857, I answered and they asked if my name was xxxxxx which i confirmed, they only asked my first name. after i confirmed they just put the phone down. Any ideas how would they be able to get my phone number? Does this sound like a tactic to try and get me to ring them back, or could it be some other, totally unrelated scam? just seems weird they knew my name.
    • Protesters opposed to the expansion of the site have clashed with police.View the full article
    • Indeed they may have.  But you will be required to submit them again when you accept the fixed penalty. The instructions will be with the offer. It's up to you whether you want to ignore those instructions or say something like "you already have them." But if you do, the offer will be withdrawn and your case will move to court action where, as I said, the cost will be considerably greater. It's your choice but I mentioned it so as to avoid you any further trouble. Believe me, I know about these things.
    • This is about the worst PCN I have ever seen.  No attempt to include a period of parking.  Denying you the right of appeal as you've accused "either/or" of two completely different offences so haven't a clue about what you're supposed to have done wrong.  As the others say no mention of POFA and sent out too late for keeper liability. You might as well get onto the CEO of Tesco  https://www.ceoemail.com/s.php?id=ceo-9138&c=Tesco Plc-Group CEO  laying it on thick about being a genuine customer and attaching proof of purchase, and ask that Tesco get the ticket cancelled.  Some companies - Asda - are superb at doing this.  Others - McDonald's - are useless.  We don't know about Tesco but it would be useful to find out.  Nothing ventured ...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Capital One ppi success


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4216 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I received a letter regarding my ppi complaint today upholding my claim for ppi.

 

From the first letter I sent on the 5th of July 2012.

 

I received a reply on the 24th of July stating that they needed 8 - 10 weeks to investigate my claim,

 

then after the initial 10 weeks I received another letter stating that they would require another 4 weeks to still investigate,

 

the 4 weeks passed and I still hadn't heard anything from them

 

I decided to phone them and they told me a letter had been sent to me on the 18th of October which I received today (24th of October),

 

I will receive a cheque from them within 21 days,

 

I was just wondering if they do take the full 21 days to send me the cheque or are they quicker.

 

It is well worth sending off a letter,

I wasn't expecting to get anything from them, so I am really pleased,

 

I will pay off all my debts and definitely not get any more credit cards!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i hope you know what you shouyld have gotten back?

 

did you do a spreadsheet

 

they are well known for short changing people

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Totally agree with DX on this one.

 

Just been short changed myself by cap1. Have a close look at over limit charges and your contractual interest rates. (Charges because of an inflated balance and interest accruing on premiums and charges should be removed from the reconstituted balance)

 

You need a SAR then ask them for a detailed breakdown of your refund. Not just the X Y and Z of what they are paying you. Ask them how they got to X Y and Z.

 

My claim is 2/3rds less than it should be because of the two points above.

 

Think consumers have been too focussed on the miss-sell aspect and havnt thought that beyond that point they still need to be keeping an eye on the claim. Suppose the sight of a big cheque blinds people to the fact said cheque should actually be bigger.

Edited by dx100uk
careful - dx
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...