Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just noticed that one of farages favorite poops was suggesting another stealth tax of 10 quid a month - possibly per person inc children ..   Minister proposed £10 monthly insurance-style patient charge to fund NHS dentists WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘Working people can’t afford another Tory tax rise,’ says Labour’s Wes Streeting   “They are framing this as some kind of pre-payment or quid pro quo, but of course, we already pay for the NHS through income tax, and in general that is a much more equitable way of doing it.” The DHSC declined to comment
    • All righty, seems I know why it was so quiet, basically the case was in transfer. I just got a letter from my local county court stating that they will be now taking over from Nots (dated 28 May 2024, wow) But no other correspondence so far. Will keep you posted
    • Hey,  I've messaged my husband but he is not contactable while he is in work. As soon as he is on his way home I will find out which finance company we used. I'm so sorry, I just don't know.
    • Okay, I have read your claim form. A pity you didn't come to us earlier. You haven't pleaded any legal basis for your claim and you haven't cited the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties Act. How long have you been aware of this forum? We will have to bring that out later when you do your witness statement. Once again, do the reading very carefully. I suggest that you wait until Monday before coming back here and confirming that you have read everything. And in particular, as I have indicated, read the thread which I posted above very carefully and in particular we the details of the contractual terms which were discovered and get a copy for yourself. Post a link to them in this thread as well for other people to see. They are relying on the fact that you don't have a direct contract with them and they are referring to a contractual term which is apparently in the contract between them and Packlink which specifically excludes third parties. You will definitely want to see this. They have tried to rely on this before but they have never produced the contract. In your witness statement you will have to request that they produced the contract in court. In terms of the mediation, frankly we would have advised you to decline mediation. It's all done secretively. Nothing is ever revealed and of course they will try to get you to compromise on the amount of money you are claiming. We would strenuously suggest that you don't give up a single penny. Do the reading that I have suggested, find the details of the contract which I have told you about which accepts direct liability to you, the customer – and post it here.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Limited Capacity - info?


livvyp
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4235 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, once again going to fill in Limited Capacity to Work form, as they lost the first one. I've read the sticky on es, and my question is, as I'm not totally incapable of work - I suffer from chronic back problems and depression but I could do about 2 hrs a day non-physical if it wasn't client facing and I could sit but move around if I needed to, as long as it wasn't a lot of travel, but could not guarantee I'd be able to do it all the time -

 

1) how should I fill in the form? I don't want to lie. Should I just use the worst-case scenario as a model for it? My worst days I can't even get out of bed, but thank God that doesn't happen too often, but is happening more and more these days.

 

2) what will happen if they agree I have a 'limited capacity' as opposed to not being able to work at all? How can I get the benefits system to take into account that all my experience is in jobs I can't do anymore, ie, client-facing, and what will happen should I succeed in getting them to acknowledge this?

 

It just seems the system is geared to absolutes and black-and-white and encourages people to be dishonest and gloomy about their future, which I really don't want to be, but don't want to go on JSA when I can't medically handle the jobs I used to do!

 

Thanks for all help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I reccomend that you, if at all possible go to your local CAB or welfare rights to get assistance with filling the form out. In general people with disabilities and illness have been put into a position where we have no choice but to present a "worst case senario" of our illness. Much of it seems to be a lottery but many people go in being honest, and positive and then find themselves on JSA with zero hope of finding a job and with all the conditionality that it incurs. CAB told me to present my worst days only and to make sure I was clear in telling them about my worse days during the assesment my first assesment was fine, the second I did the same but the ATOS HCP even then let most of what I said and twisted what I did say. So in addition filling out your form I would also ensure you request a recorded assesment as unfortunately ATOS cannot be trusted.

 

 

You are right about what this benefit does in making peoples outlook for the future worse, not to mention how the stress of the job affects the health of those going though the ESA assesement process which for many is a never ending merry go round. It would be wonderful to be able to have an honest, face to face converstation with someone you knew wasn't just trying to take your benefit away from you. The you could discuss your realistic prospects but as it is if you mention anything positive they take it as a green light to chuck you off esa.

 

The best bet really is to have someone else help you fill out the form then you can discuss with an experianced person what would be best for your situation.

 

I wish you the best.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:livvyp:

 

A few advisors suggest worst day senario but consensus of opinion on CAG, including mine, is honesty with as much detail as possible. You'll look very silly if a decision maker or, even worse, a tribunal panel notes contradictions between your ESA50 and your medical evidence.

 

You can't get the benefits system to take into account that your experience is in jobs you can't do any more. The assessment is of your capability for work, not your capability for a previous job. Should you be found fit for work you can ask that a jobseekers agreement makes allowances for your medical condition.

 

Good luck with the new form, Margaret.

 

Edit:

 

Because of my tendency to rant about the issue I only discuss audio recording of assessments in reply to a question. Now it's been mentioned;

 

Should you want your assessment recorded, add your request to the info about arrangements for your assessment on page 2 of the questionnaire.

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be totally honest. If you are citing your worst day, say it is your worst day. If it goes to Tribunal, they will be able to tell what is normal/usual/bad days etc. and as said previously you don't want anything contradicting anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

^^^ completely agree with all the above. You have plenty of space to illustrate your condition(s) and how it affects you. You can always use additional sheets of paper. You may sail through your WCA and score a zillion points, fair enough, but what you are doing is laying the groundwork for that ever so slim possibility that ATOS just might give 0 points and you need to build your case for appeal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, God, from what I can glean online, it seems that ATOS DID receive my first form (info I can find says that they'll call for medical assessment 'on receiving the questionnaire). This is bad, as I fell into a lot of the traps ie not presenting my worst case scenario and not giving enough of my 'worst' information. Plus I didn't even make a copy. (I know, I know, but I was stressed and had side-effets from medication) What can I do now? My 2nd questionnaire, which I haven't sent off yet as am waiting for GP report, is more accurate and leaves far less room for their tricks. HELP. Is there anything I can do, beyond bringing GP's form? Can I say I made mistakes in the form and would like to send the new one instead? (No, I bet) Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, just rang ATOS and they say that if the questionnaire has been received, ATOS hasn't noted it, so looks like I'm OK to submit new one, but will check with DWP. Also got them to agree to let me come to an assessment centre that is clearly nearer than the one they gave me in the letter. Going for my physio today, so will check if GP has done my report.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Submit your new one ...ATOSSERS will not even be aware they don`t read them anyway & you can always say to them that you have an upto date one ...well thats my opiniun from having 2 of them and still sending in new info to harrasss them more :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. Still dreading medical and feeling horrible with pain and meds but glad to have your help. Been reading lots about ATOS etc and feel that there should be a union for people who claim benefits, as 'they' seem to be able to do, change goalposts arbitrarily and generally treat humans like bits of garbage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...