Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Northern Rail evasion letter 15 yr old


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4258 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello. I've read quite a few threads on here and elsewhere regarding these letters, but I was just wondering about our specific circumstances.

My 15 year old daughter went camping one evening in August, and ended up further away from home than she expected (a long walk). She didn't take any money, consequently when she and her friends got the train home (one stop from Goostrey to Holmes Chapel), they were caught by the ticket inspector and their details taken. Now, a couple of months later, she has received a fare evasion letter threatening prosecution, which has worried us both immensely. She has never been in any sort of trouble before and is in the middle of GCSEs so we don't want this hanging over our heads.

I am fairly sure that, if she writes to them on the back of the form explaining the circumstances and that she is extremely sorry, and also that we will pay the fare plus costs, she will not be taken to court. However, I'm hoping that someone on this forum could reassure us about this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello. I've read quite a few threads on here and elsewhere regarding these letters, but I was just wondering about our specific circumstances.

My 15 year old daughter went camping one evening in August, and ended up further away from home than she expected (a long walk). She didn't take any money, consequently when she and her friends got the train home (one stop from Goostrey to Holmes Chapel), they were caught by the ticket inspector and their details taken. Now, a couple of months later, she has received a fare evasion letter threatening prosecution, which has worried us both immensely. She has never been in any sort of trouble before and is in the middle of GCSEs so we don't want this hanging over our heads.

I am fairly sure that, if she writes to them on the back of the form explaining the circumstances and that she is extremely sorry, and also that we will pay the fare plus costs, she will not be taken to court. However, I'm hoping that someone on this forum could reassure us about this!

 

 

Yes, I would say that your suggested course of action will resolve this quite quickly.

 

Whilst for most TOCs there is no desire to prosecute juveniles, the age of criminal responsibility is 12 years, so it would be possible to put such a matter before a Youth Court.

 

That said, it is extremely unlikely that any TOC would wish to do so although it also has to be said that any person who does not have a ticket or means to pay has no right to travel on a train without formal permission being granted.

 

Write on behalf of your juvenile daughter and explain the circumstances, apologise for the error borne of youthful naievety, offer to pay the fare and the reasonable costs incurred by the TOC in collecting it and give an undertaking that the offence will not be repeated. Both you and your daughter should sign the letter and I'm sure that you will get a result that clears the matter up and gives the desired warning to your daughter.

Edited by Old-CodJA
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I would say that your suggested course of action will resolve this quite quickly.

 

Whilst for most TOCs there is no desire to prosecute juveniles, the age of criminal responsibility is 12 years, so it would be possible to put such a matter before a Youth Court.

 

That said, it is extremely unlikely that any TOC would wish to do so although it also has to be said that any person who does not have a ticket or means to pay has no right to travel on a train without formal permission being granted.

 

Write on behalf of your juvenile daughter and explain the circumstances, apologise for the error borne of youthful naievety, offer to pay the fare and the reasonable costs incurred by the TOC in collecting it and give an undertaking that the offence will not be repeated. Both you and your daughter should sign the letter and I'm sure that you will get a result that clears the matter up and gives the desired warning to your daughter.

 

I concur with this.

 

Unless she has been stopped previously, she will probably issued a reprimand letter by Northern Rail, along with a small admin charge around £10-£20.

 

Should she be stopped at any point in the future, she will find it difficult to avoid court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I concur with this.

 

Unless she has been stopped previously, she will probably issued a reprimand letter by Northern Rail, along with a small admin charge around £10-£20.

 

Should she be stopped at any point in the future, she will find it difficult to avoid court.

 

 

Yes, there is in fact a guideline to remind all prosecutors that every effort should be made to deal with any relatively low-level first time offences committed by young persons (aged 12 - 17) outside of the Courts.

 

It is obviously only a guideline and really serious offences will always be put before the Courts, but this kind of matter will always fall in that area unless very persistent.

 

The system is designed to re-educate as much as it is to punish and re-education should always be the primary aim where young people are concerned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your comments. Luckily this is the first (and only) time she's done this and it certainly wasn't with any intent to commit an offence. There are very rarely any ticket attendants or inspectors on our part of the line so she (naively) didn't even think twice about hopping on the train for one stop with no money (she hadn't even originally intended to get the train anyway!). She hates to get in trouble about anything so that's a lesson learned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...