Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

help please - Barclaycard PPI


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4230 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear All,

 

I recently received a rejection letter from Barclaycard regarding my PPI complaint as they cannot locate any information regarding my historic accounts. Is the onus on my to substantiate my claim?

 

Any help would be useful.

 

Many thanks.:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly I think this may prove very difficult then.

 

Barclaycard will claim they they do not hold data beyond six years old and if the account was closed more than six years ago then they may have destroyed the records anyway.

 

I think that unless you can come with some data you may be kippered.

 

We do know that BC have mysteriously found information as some members have got stuff going back to 2002 after pressing them hard but it hasn't been easy.

 

With your SAR did you give them details of the address you were at when the account was open? If not you could try that.

 

Alternatively you could try reporting to the ICO that BC have failed with your SAR and see what they say.

 

Its not going to be easy I'm afraid.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear ims21.

Thank you for your insight. I will continue with SAR request and apply pressure.

 

On a seperate matter, LLoyds tsb credit card recently came back to me to deny my PPI claim on the basis that I ticked the original application box to request ppi. This claim goes back to 2002 and from memory, I have never signed any applications (including Debenhams) and i would refute their response - what action can I take (i am a Lloyds customer)?

Thank you.

NB: first time user, sorry if I am posting in wrong areas.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As regards Lloyds, tell them that you want to see evidence that you ticked the box.

 

You are perfectly entitled to challenge their decision so go through their refusal letter and challenge each point you disagree with.

 

Out of interest, what were the reasons you gave for the mis-sale of these items in the first place?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ims21 - thank you. I intend to challenge their decision.

My rationale for PPI complaints is that I neither wanted them, they were never explained to me or were of no use to me at the time of applications. I guess thats the correct emphasis?

I guess like most people, I am going after alot of claims.

Lloyds settled at the beginning of the year, which was nice.

Natwest credit card settled earlier this year too.

Debenhams - pending

Kwik-fit - pending

HSBC/Midland bank - pending

 

Any tips would be useful.

Thanks alot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well your grounds for the complaint seem valid.

 

The best tip I can give you is keep at them and have a read around the PPI threads....there's a lot of information in them which may help you.

 

Also have a look in the PPI success sticky as there links there to the success threads....start with the latest ones first.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i had the same letter from barclays aaying they could not locate a policy.i then sent oF for S.A.R and that came back with a policy

number highlighted in blue marker with the words ppi protected ,sent these details back to re,open my claim and last week got the same letter saying they cant locate a account (ive just sent it to them) now its gone to F.O.B.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...