Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe concenquences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points?
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Enforcing a CCJ against my landlord


id330uk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3663 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Miscellaneous charges can be and are regularly charged more than once (although not under the new regulations).

 

As already stated, an HCEO will charge a fee for each attendance. Accordingly, paperwork is left on each occasion.

If you are that dissatisfied with the HCEOs actions you should complain to them in the first instance and if still dissatisfied to the HCEOA.

 

I will support that 100%

 

I don't think anymore can be added to the replies already given, it is such we can only tell things as they are and cannot simply 'adjust' them to make it out to be what the poster would prefer to hear.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 202
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The law is stated in The High Court Enforcement Officers Regulations 2004

SCHEDULE 3 FEES CHARGEABLE BY ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS

 

In order to end this debate can someone tell me where in this schedule 3 that I reproduce below it is stated that a HCEO can charge a fee each time he makes an attendance even if no goods has been seized ?

 

The fees chargeable by enforcement officers on execution of writs are as follows. Value Added Tax, if payable, may be added to the fees specified.

 

A. Fees chargeable on execution of writs of fieri facias

1. Percentage of amount recovered

For executing a writ of fieri facias, the following percentages of the amount recovered:

(a)on the first £100

5 per cent

(b)above £100

2.5 per cent

 

2. Mileage

Mileage from the enforcement officer’s business address to the place of execution and return, in respect of one journey to seize goods and, if appropriate, one journey to remove the goods

29.2 pence per mile, up to a maximum of £50.00 in total

 

3. Seizure of goods

For each building or place at which goods are seized

£2.00

 

4. Making enquiries or dealing with claims for rent or to the goods

(1) For making enquiries as to claims for rent or to goods, including giving notice to parties of any such claims

a sum not exceeding £2.00

(2) For all expenses actually and reasonably incurred in relation to such work including any postage, telephone, fax and e-mail charges

a further sum not exceeding £2.00

 

5. Taking possession, removal and storage of goods

(1) Where a person is left in physical possession of goods seized

£3.00 per person per day

(2) Where an enforcement officer takes walking possession under a walking possession agreement in the form set out in Schedule 4 to these Regulations

£0.25 per day

(Fees 5(1) and 5(2) are payable in respect of the day on which execution is levied, but fee 5(1) may not be charged where a walking possession agreement is signed at the time of levy. Fees 5(1) and 5(2) may not be charged after the goods have been removed.)

(3) For—

(a)the removal of goods;

(b)the storage of goods which have been removed; and

©where animals have been seized, their upkeep while in the custody of the enforcement officer, whether before or after removal

the sums actually and reasonably paid

 

6. Sale of goods by auction

(1) To cover the auctioneer’s commission and expenses, where goods are sold by auction or work has been done with a view to sale by auction:

(a)when goods are sold by auction on the auctioneer’s premises, the following percentages of the sum realised—

(i)on the first £100

15 per cent

(ii)on the next £900

12.5 per cent

(iii)above £1,000

10 per cent

(b)when goods are sold by auction on the debtor’s premises, 7.5 per cent of the sum realised plus expenses actually and reasonably incurred.

(2) When no sale takes place either by auction or private contract, but work has been done by the auctioneer or enforcement officer in preparing for a sale by auction, including the preparation of a detailed inventory of the goods seized—

(a)if the goods have been removed to the auctioneer’s premises, 10 per cent of the value of the goods;

(b)if the goods have not been removed from the debtor’s premises, 5 per cent of the value of the goods plus expenses actually and reasonably incurred.

 

7. Sale of goods by private contract

Where an enforcement officer sells goods by private contract—

(a)

the following percentages of the proceeds of sale—

(i)on the first £100

7.5 per cent

(ii)on the next £900

6.25 per cent

(iii)above £1,000

5 per cent; and

(b)when work has been done in preparing for a sale by auction, including the preparation of a detailed inventory of the goods seized, an additional sum not exceeding 2.5 per cent of the value of the goods plus expenses actually and reasonably incurred.

B. Fees chargeable on executing writs of possession or delivery

 

8. Mileage

Mileage from the enforcement officer’s business address to the place of execution and return, in respect of one journey

29.2 pence per mile, up to a maximum of £25.00 in total

 

9. Writs of possession

(1) Where an enforcement officer executes a writ of possession of domestic property within the meaning of section 66 of the Local Government Finance Act 1988(1), 3 per cent of the net annual value for rating shown in the valuation list in force immediately before 1st April 1990 in respect of the property seized, subject to paragraph (3).

(2) Where an enforcement officer executes a writ of possession to which paragraph (1) does not apply, 0.4 per cent of the net annual value for rating of the property seized, subject to paragraph (4).

(3) For the purposes of paragraph (1), where the property does not consist of one or more hereditament which, immediately before 1st April 1990—

(a)had a separate net annual value for rating shown on the valuation list then in force; and

(b)was domestic property within the meaning of section 66 of the Local Government Finance Act 1988,

the property or such part of it as does not so consist shall be taken to have had such a value for rating equal to two-fifteenths of its value by the year when seized.

(4) For the purposes of paragraph (2), where the property does not consist of one or more hereditaments having a separate net annual value for rating, the property or such part of it as does not so consist shall be taken to have such a value equal to its value by the year when seized.

 

10. Writs of delivery

For executing a writ of delivery, 4 per cent of the value of the goods as stated in the writ or judgment.

C. General fees

 

11. Copies of returns

For a copy of any return indorsed by the enforcement officer on a writ of execution

£5.00

 

12. Miscellaneous

For any matter not otherwise provided for, such sum as a Master, district judge or costs judge may allow upon application.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Enforcing a CCJ against my landlord
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...