Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowells have brought my vodafone debt - help **awaiting op update**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4322 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Don't call them ; you won't be able to rely on anything they say, and it will only encourage them.

 

Write to them, stressing:

a) You dispute the amount they are claiming (or, if it is the case, that you dispute you owe them anything at all!)

b) you require them to send you proof of what they claim you owe, including an itemised breakdown of how they have arrived at that sum,

c) that you will not communicate by 'phone, and that you require them to stop sending you texts or calling, and that they should communicate with you in writing only.

 

After that (& there are some template letters that can help), ignore (but keep!) any texts. If they call you, don't go through "account security" ; tell them "I've asked for communication by letter only, & don't discuss personal financial matters over the phone", especially where someone has called you, so you can't be sure who it is calling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bazzas is correct

 

They will also wrote to you under different names such as Red Debt Collection and Hamptons Legal, the latter designed to make you think that they have passed the case to solicitors when it's just the guy on the next desk

 

I believe I read a suggestion on CAG that it isn't necessarily a different desk, just different headed paper loaded into the printer.

 

Either way I'm not advocating debt avoidance, just being sure you only pay what you owe, if you owe anything at all.

 

My experience of Lowell / Red / Hamptons is based on what I've seen with my wife. She says (& I believe her, not just because she is my wife, but also because I've seen the replies and proof she has sent to the multiple DCA's her "account" has been passed between) that she doesn't owe a different mobile phone co. money regarding a "termination fee". They, apparently, feel she does.

We've invited them, based on what we've consistently said, to let a court decide, as repeatedly asking for them to prove their escalating demands has produced only ..... More demands,

 

Put them to proof of what they claim you owe.

If you don't owe them anything, pay nothing. Communicate by letter only, expect lots of bluff, demands & threats, but don't expect court papers, only the threat of such.

 

If you do owe money, pay what you owe, and only that, and only to whoever currently owns the debt. If you do actually owe something, you'll need to find out how much, and if it is still owed to Voda (if Lowell are acting for Voda & any sum is still owed to Voda, , or if Lowell's have purchased an alleged debt from Voda & any sum due is due to them).

 

Would I believe Lowell or the first person from Voda's contact centre? Not based on what I've seen on CAG.

Would I involve Lee the Voda Rep on CAG (by the means stated by a previous poster)? Absolutely!

 

Good luck!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...