Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Accused by company to have broken EULA - Won't respond to any challenges or requests


Honour3
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4431 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I paid for VIP membership of a game (supporting the developer in an otherwise free-to-play game) that I enjoyed, approx 8 weeks ago.

Approx 4 weeks ago my account was banned, I enquired as to why and was told that my account was banned/suspended as I had broken the EULA via cheat/hack/mod/alteration of experience.

 

I did not do this. Full stop.

 

I've challenged their finding, they reported that they looked into it again, came to the same conclusion and closed the case again.

Then I requested they tell me more information and asked they save all info relating to my case, my time of violation and play-length/time on the day in question; then I requested more information again, then asked for an explanation again, prompted a response and so on.

I've not received a reply since they said they looked into the matter again and closed it with the same conclusion.

I've posted about 10 messages in the "support" thread regarding the issue and sent 2-4 direct emails regarding the issue - all with references and so on.

 

 

 

I believe the Ombudsman can't help in this case, so who can?

They won't respond, I've asked for any type of response several times to no avail.

(Company in question is US-based Hi-Rez Studios)

Link to post
Share on other sites

How did you pay and how much? A chargeback may be possible if you paid them by credit / debit card.

 

My guess is you play "global agenda" which was a game made on the "unreal tournament 3" game engine. UT3 was famed for the cheats people used and the fact that the cheats were untraceable. Let them know what you want as a solution, else you will be recovering your cash via chargeback.

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

My reply didn't appear.. so, again:

 

 

The game in question is actually "Tribes: Ascend". A quick googling seems to reveal that it is also run/developed on the Unreal Tournament 3 engine, however.

 

I never knew about this "untraceable cheats" thing with UT3 engine-run games? How then could they have "reviewed evidence" too determine whether or not I cheated at all? You're suggesting I'm being duped?

I have an itch to know what initiated this accusation of my having cheated, if this is correct.

 

 

I paid approx £10 (I forget the exact figure atm).

 

Before visiting this forum, I was entirely unaware of a "chargeback" process. Reading the wikipedia page of "Chargebacks" (I'm not allowed to post links?), under "Reason Codes", I note that my issue falls under none of the 4 types listed - so would I be right to use this function? My caution as to using the function while unaware of possible consequences is due to reading another thread on this forum, in which someone is being taken to court by the supplier due to his processing a "Chargeback".

 

 

 

Unfortunate that I'm being barred from continuing to enjoy a game with my friends - that I supported too - due to some stupid cheat accusation. I wouldn't mind so much if they would reply, but neither stressing my innocence nor unfair treatment (no replies/correspondences regarding my case) prompts them to make a reply. Sad that it's ended up here.

 

 

Thank you for your timely response and help :)

Edited by Honour3
Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason it is hard to catch cheaters in UT3 is that it is designed to be playable using dial up internet, so most of the workings out is done on each users PC, which puts a heck of a lot of trust in these users not to modify their program or run cheats in the background.

 

Try a "whois" search of the website and emailing the registered owner with your problem. I would point out that you have donated to a free to play game, which shows how much you like it, and that you would not cheat at a game you like.

 

Personally would think if someone was going to cheat they would not donate, they would just cheat their way to the top.

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, thanks a lot for your explanation concerning the UT3 engine.

 

Your "WhoIs" resolution idea sounds good, too. The website has no phone numbers and as said, the relevant given email address gives me no response.

 

I will hold the "Chargeback" issue as a point of interest in messages I will be sending to them (once more), but I won't actually go through with that process as of yet. I will again try to resolve this issue with the hope of my account being reactivated.

 

 

Thanks for your prompt replies, wasn't quite sure if anything could be said to my case in this forum: success.

I will update this thread as the situation develops.

 

Again, thanks a lot! :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally don't think you have much hope of "forcing" them to do anything... 1st they're in the US and 2nd they provide the game but the characters and in game items are all their property, so they can delete or ban as they wish. Appeal to their sense of fair play, and tell them politely they have made a mistake.

 

The chargeback would probably be denied, but is definitely worth telling them that if they don't see you are playing fair that is an option for you. You need to show this as just an option for you, it will be hard to not make this look like a threat though so word your message carefully. Remember you want to get the administrators on your side.

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...