Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I agree with you, UB. More parties might not be such a bad thing. More on Farage's manifesto - sorry, contract.  
    • Sorry but first of all you are still referring to your six-month right to reject – but you didn't assert your right within six months so this is not relevant. The situation is that you cannot reject the vehicle unless it is a write off or you have been deprived of the use of it for a significant period of time so that it can be said that you have been deprived of substantially the whole benefit of the contract. By my understanding that is not the case here. Your complaint must be that they are in breach of contract because the vehicle is not satisfactory quality. Clearly because of the way the windscreen was fitted it was not satisfactory quality when it was purchased and it has not remained in satisfactory condition for a reasonable period of time – witness the leakage and the corrosion in the car. On this basis you are holding them responsible for the cost of repairs which are £XXX and any ancillary costs reasonably incurred as a result of their breach of contract. You are currently without the car and this is not a situation which can continue. You are enclosing the evidence plus quotations for repair and you want that by the end of the week you want them to agree to the repairs. Broadly that. Please post a draft as soon as possible. You don't want to hang around on this
    • Hello folks  Got a letter from overdales the day after I submitted my defence this contains a copy of credit card agreement and a letter stating the account has been sold to lowell. H
    • Seen a number of videos online of interviews with people in town centres around the UK. Those that say they will vote Reform can accurately be described as 'Gammon Faced'. So frustrated with life in 2024 and yearning to switch the clock back many decades, they don't really care about the policies of Reform. What appears to appeal to them about Reform is an old fashioned nostalgic outlook, of trying to get the country back to how it was a very long time ago. Yes much of this is about immigration, but it is also about many other issues such as Equalities legislation, Human Rights etc, which they believe have gone too far. For the above reasons, I don't think many who are looking to vote Reform, will switch their votes back to other parties they have voted for before. From what I have seen in polling, 70% were previously Tory and about 30% Labour. The Tories under Sunak can no longer appeal to those who now back Reform. For example, I doubt any Tory Government would support leaving ECHR, because that would most likely be opposed by the majority in the UK. And many Tory MP's would not support leaving ECHR and the House of Lords would block anyway ignoring any conventions to give way to The Commons. A combination of Brexit, Reform lead by Farage and the average age of this voter demographic is quite likely to lead to the extinction of The Conservative party. What may happen after this election is that the right of politics splits into new groups. Some Tory MP's are likely to jump ship and join Reform. And others will try to relaunch the Conservative brand as a centre right modern party. This could possibly lead to the Lib Dems becoming main opposition party at some point. The outcome of this election could well significantly change UK politics forever. And it is not just about the future of the Tories, Labour with a huge majority may find it difficult to keep some on the left happy with Government progress on tackling some issues. So we may see a fracture within Labour support and new parties formed.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Claim for hardship allowance lost in the system.


Farbramble
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4430 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Due to my JSA being sanctioned, I made an application (at the local JC+) for a hardship payment.

 

Now two-weeks have passed & I haven't heard anything. I called the DWP today & the guy said that there isn't any sign of said application in the system!

 

Do I have to make a fresh claim? Also, what's the best way to make a complaint?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you hand the form in or post it?

 

The hardship decisions are not made by the DWP they are made by a nominated officer in the JCP.

 

I recommend contacting the JCP office tomorrow morning to make an enquiry about your application.

 

Also is this your first sanction and how long is the sanction for?

 

Hardship is not normally payable to the first two weeks of a sanction (unless you are in a vunerable group) and if it is a work programme sanction it is not payable at all unless you are in the vunerable group.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was told to turn up at JC+. An employee just asked the questions and typed the answers into the PC (kinda strange that no signature was requested).

 

Sanction is second one, and is for 3-mths (to be appealed by letter, not GL24 as advised by JC staff).

 

I'll pop down to the JC tomorrow and see what's going on!

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you hand the form in or post it?

 

The hardship decisions are not made by the DWP they are made by a nominated officer in the JCP.

 

I recommend contacting the JCP office tomorrow morning to make an enquiry about your application.

 

Also is this your first sanction and how long is the sanction for?

 

Hardship is not normally payable to the first two weeks of a sanction (unless you are in a vunerable group) and if it is a work programme sanction it is not payable at all unless you are in the vunerable group.

 

Shocked here - is the lack of Hardship Payment if Work Programme related Sanction a new thing? when did it come into affect, and how many people are likely to die?

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

what is the sanction for (3 months is usually work prgramme)?

 

Sanctioned due to not applying for a job vacancy (as was the previous 3-month sanction).

 

Flumps, I'd also like to echo Caledfwlch's question Re sanctions for the work programme; when did this start?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will need to contact the JCP to enquire about the progress of your application, in te office I work in you don't actually speak to the decision maker themselves at any time of te application and a decision is made within 2 working days with you being notified of te decision asap. The form is then sent to the BC to be processed.

 

With regards to the work programme, it has been in place since work programme started, if you receive a wp sanction (which is between the provider and DMA not the BC or JCP) and you are not in the vunerable group then hardship is not payable and I know this definitely affects the 26 week sanctions as dealt with a very unpleasant case a couple of weeks ago despite the JCP not meant to have any dealings at all with the WP sanctions, how am I supposed to ignore a suicidal customer exactly?

It is basically meant to encourage the customer to re-engage with the work programme as tbh if you have reached that stage of the sanction process then there are problems with attendance from what we can gather at the JCP.

Hardship legislation is not easily found so I can't locate and post links.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update.

 

Phoned the local JCP office and there was no sign of the claim for hardship (JSA10). Was referred to the (processing dept?) at Watford who gave the same answer.

 

So now made an appointment, again, to make a claim for hardship.

 

Just two questions:

 

Can I get the claim backdated?

 

When I make a formal complaint, should I write to the district manager?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can request the claim is taken from the first day of the sanction, being honest I don't know if it is automatically looked at from the date of the sanction or the date the form is requested.

The letter of complaint needs to be addressed to the Customer Service Manager at the JCP, if you address it to the district manager it will only be bounced back to the JCP anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sanctioned due to not applying for a job vacancy (as was the previous 3-month sanction).

 

Flumps, I'd also like to echo Caledfwlch's question Re sanctions for the work programme; when did this start?

 

3 months with no income?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, just an update.

 

Despite the original application for hardship getting messed up (JC+ employee left me an important message on the phone that I failed to intercept), the decision maker decided to backdate the claim to the start of the sanction (3-weeks backdate without the 15-days waiting period:-)).

 

I have to add that my case isn't usual as I have a medical condition (epilesy). Maybe the 15-days waiting period didn't apply to me due to being vulnerable, but I'm not sure as I'm only receiving the lower-rate hardship (£40 p/w) for normal people (usually £55 p/w for those deemed vulnerable by the decision maker).

 

I'm hoping to appeal the decision & try to get the higher amount of hardship based upon the medical condition.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because you have a long term illness/disability (epliepsy) you fall into the vunerable group sp yes it is correct that your hardship is taken from day one. I'm not sure about the amounts though sorry as I am not a decision maker for hardship claims and as I don't process I don't have access tho the amounts either.

 

Glad you got it sorted though :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...