Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Personal letter from Charterhouse Claims (PPI). WHY??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4417 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Just wondering about a personally addressed letter I received from Charterhouse Claims today, thanking me for my recent enquiry as to PPI reclaims, and enclosing the relevant claim forms (I have never made any enquiry at all about PPI).

 

Just wondering why I've received this - do they know something I don't know, or is it just spam, fishing for business?

 

I say this because the letter bears my full name and address, plus my landline phone (that I had disconnected 3 years ago), and my 'proper' email address that I only use for official business like banking, etc. It's the inclusion of my landline number that piqued my interest - it was always ex-directory, is long gone, and was only ever given out to my creditors, and nobody else.

 

To the best of my knowledge, I've never taken out PPI. When asked about it, I've always refused it. There may of course have been occasions when it was sneaked onto my accounts without my knowledge (hence the current PPI hoo-haa), but this is where it all becomes a blur.

 

When I first started using credit cards, I was 19 (I'm now 27), had my own home for the first time, and relied on lots of different credit accounts just to find my feet. I got out of that spiral a few years ago, but in the initial years, I was maintaining half a dozen credit cards at any one time. I have no real idea if I have had PPI on any (other than when I've outright declined the cover when asked to purchase it).

 

I've had credit cards with all of the following, some of which had whopping balances at some point, but all of which were managed well (no defaults, etc.):

 

HSBC (2003)

Capital One (2004)

Barclaycard (x2 seperate cards) (2007 & 2011)

Vanquis (2007)

Virgin (MBNA) (2008)

Aqua (Halifax) (2007)

 

All of my credit has been specifically credit cards.

 

Are Charterhouse known to be handling claims for any of the above companies?

 

Might there be something 'in' this letter from them, or should I just ignore it?

 

If I have had PPI, it has definitely been mis-sold...namely because I wasn't aware of it.

 

Thanks for reading!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty much as I suspected, thanks. Yes, very clever, esp. in light of the personal info that I share with nobody - damn credit companies selling my info at some point, I guess :)

 

I shan't bother pursuing a PPI claim, I'd only bother if I didn't have to go through the time and effort of contacting half a dozen companies, not even knowing if I'd ever had PPI. Was just wondering what this letter was all about...

 

...thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if you do have a suspicion of ppi on any form of credit and you can't remember, you can get a copy of the agreement for £1 or the whole works about you for a tenner. Just keep it in mind as there could be a golden egg somewhere waiting for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...