Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • America is a republic, (and) not a democracy - not quite there yet   Trump is a corrupt felon, not a president - yep
    • Hello I hope someone can give me some advice here, as I am at a bit of a loss on how to proceed. This relates to alleged offences under the RTA. Yesterday I received a notification from the local police of intention to prosecute for the following offences: 1 driving without due care and attention 2 failing to stop at a road traffic accident 3 failing to report a road traffic accident At this stage they have only asked me to say whether I was the driver at the time or not and provided a blank sheet of paper to give information about the incident. Going by the location (just round the corner from where I live) I can only imagine this relating to one recent incident, which wasn't actually an accident but more of a road rage event. I was driving past someone unloading or working next to his lorry which had stopped in the road. I wasn't going fast or anything, while I went by lorry man turned around and punched and kicked my car whilst going past him. I stopped and got out and wanted to know what he thought he was doing punching and kicking my car. He then hurled some verbal abuse at me, swearing and he was quite aggressive. I still didn't know what his problem was and said I would report him to his company for threatening behaviour and vandalism for punching my car. I got my phone and tried to take a photo of his lorry and number plate but at that moment he came right at me, still shouting and swearing, so I was worried he may hit me next, as he already punched my car. I thought if the guy hits me I will come off second best, so I decided to retreat. I quickly got back into my car and left. When I checked my phone later the photo I tried to take was blurred and useless, so I thought it was pointless to report the incident to the police, as the guy would not be traceable. Over that I forgot about it until I got the letter yesterday in the post. This is the only thing I believe this can relate to, but I have no idea based on what the three above allegations come from There was no road traffic accident, more of a road rage incident. So I am at a loss what to do. I have 28 days to respond. Should I just say yes I was the driver and was there and see what happens next, or should I already make a written statement on the attached piece of paper they sent me and send that with it ? Is there anyone here who would have a rough idea what to do next ? I tried my legal advice line through my Union, but they have sent me from pillar to post, now say it needs to go to a different department again and that would be chargeable as the RTA comes under Criminal Law. So any advice would be appreciated Many Thanks
    • So a quick update got bounced around two different departments and managed to speak to a DVLA bod , explained the situation and they could see the overlap and that DD payments had been made from Feb , also no formal remiders prior , they gave me a number for the legal dept who I am calling this morning to see what they can do in terms of the SJP notice , still have time to submit this online.  Will update after my chat this morning 
    • filed the defence at same time as suggested @dx100uk
    • Also, I am trying to understand how invoicing a large sum in a 6m period becomes tax fraud?   Is it because if he had invoiced over the £85k threshold he should have been obligated to charge vat?  Which would have meant hmrc would have benefited from the vat amount? So by not charging it Hmrc have lost out on £s revenue?  Is that what makes it tax fraud? So as a self-employed contractor, let's say he invoiced one Co for 200k.  Should he have charged vat on the full 200k (£40k)? Or just on the sum above the threshold (£23k)?  And that by not charging vat, he has knowingly withheld tax £s from Hmrc? And is the payer complicit ?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

judge granted a time out order, but RCI legal team want £14k in costs


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4445 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

No doubt this to late for advice,

 

with out going into fine detail,

 

my daughter has been in dispute with them over a vehicle,

eventually it went to court to be returned,

 

Several problem with the agreement, unfair treatment, and faults on the vehicle,

 

The judge granted a time out order, but RCI legal team are now trying to recover £14000 in costs,

 

They want points of dispute on the till of costs, which is beyond are legal abilities.

 

She now a single mother, and has no money or assets.

 

 

They are aware of this but continue to persue her, It would seem Bankruptcy is the only option.

 

The car is worth less a clio 05 extreme.

 

I really do not know what to do she is totally stressed and unable to cope

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder why they are insisting on pursuing this, your

daughter has no realisable assetts and no prospect of

ever paying this enormous amount of costs, where do

they think the money is going to come from.

How much time has the judge allowed for this?

Really you musr assure her that there is little of any

consequence they can do, no assetts of any sort it

may be best to tell them to let a judge decide on this.

 

Prepare a financial statement I presume she is in receipt

of benefits as her only income?

 

Bankruptcy is a not an option as there are no assets of any

sort.

 

I am going to suggest that you write to RCI stating your daughters

financial status and requiring them to let a judge decide and copy

the letter to the court and also stating to the court that she does

not have the means or the knolwedge to be able to respond to their

demand for points of dispute.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say the judge granted a time order (not a time out order :-) ) was any provision made for costs? Is a hearing scheduled to assess the costs? It sounds like they have gone to detailed assessment but that is quite unusual in what appears to be a simple return of goods case.

 

What does their bill of costs actually state?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If their bill of costs is 14K it wasn't a simple ROG case. Clearly there must have been a full blown defended case which the OP lost at trial. If she doesn't file any points of dispute, they'll get a Default Costs Certificate for the full 14K. If she has no assets, she has nothing to be afraid of, they won't be able to enforce the costs order (or, presumably, the judgment they must have got against her at trial). She might want to consider making herself bankrupt if she wants to put it to bed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If their bill of costs is 14K it wasn't a simple ROG case. Clearly there must have been a full blown defended case

 

That's what I was asking, without details of the case we won't really know where to attack the bill of costs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I( don't understand you saying that "Bankruptcy is not an option as there are no assets of any sort". You do not need to have assets to petition bankruptcy. Ifyou are addled with a large debt and have no assets some might argue that this is the best time to go bankrupt. That way there is no debt payment order for 36 months and if your circumstances were to change over time nobody can still pursue you for the debt.

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thought

I wonder why they are insisting on pursuing this, your

daughter has no realisable assetts and no prospect of

ever paying this enormous amount of costs, where do

they think the money is going to come from.

How much time has the judge allowed for this?

Really you musr assure her that there is little of any

consequence they can do, no assetts of any sort it

may be best to tell them to let a judge decide on this.

 

Prepare a financial statement I presume she is in receipt

of benefits as her only income?

 

Bankruptcy is a not an option as there are no assets of any

sort.

 

I am going to suggest that you write to RCI stating your daughters

financial status and requiring them to let a judge decide and copy

the letter to the court and also stating to the court that she does

not have the means or the knolwedge to be able to respond to their

demand for points of dispute.

 

I( don't understand you saying that "Bankruptcy is not an option as there are no assets of any sort". You do not need to have assets to petition bankruptcy. If you have a large debt and have no assets some might argue that this is the best time to go bankrupt. That way there is no debt payment order for 36 months and if your circumstances were to change over time nobody can still pursue you for the debt. She may even qualify for a Debt Relief Order.

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting back on track;

 

What does the order itself say about costs?

What does the bill of costs include?

What happened with the case itself that you've got yourself in this position?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for all the replies, Yes it was a full blown case, and a trail, it was lost, but the judge grant at time order under the consumer credit act. She is paying £30 as month as moment but it should increase to £123 at the end of this month. She will not be able to pay this amount, We did make an offer at the being of the case, but their solicitors wanted it fast tracked. My daughter then became pregnant and was not well, we had the trail delayed for 6months, The cost were resevered, but an order to pay the claimants costs by agreement and if not by detailed assessement. which is were it is now. I have wrote to them and will forward a copy to RC! I thought maybe the general manager, It really seems they are mad spending so much money out on a car which is worth no more then £1500

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...