Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS polled FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the and the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
    • well if your not going to upload documents because you are too scared of your data being stolen and someone rocking up to you we are going to struggle to help you peoples energy data breach has nothing to do with a hosting site...
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Does my Tenant in Common Partner have a legal leg to stand on? Can I force a sale myself?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4465 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I wonder if someone can help me. I am currently the co-owner as tenants-in-common, of a 3-bedroom house. I have the smaller share, though still a good chunk. It is mortgage free. Neither of us live there and it was being used for holiday-lets but this is no longer the case, as, among other reasons, it needs some updating.

 

The problem is that my co-owner, a relative, is impossible to work with as a partner. He’s had complete control of the accounts from the beginning and refuses to let me see them. I know that the property had a considerable amount of income when it was being used as a holiday let, (mostly through an agent, so there is paperwork) but I have no idea what has happened to this money. He keeps demanding payment towards utility bills and for remedial works to the adjoining barn (which was supposed to have been funded by the aforementioned lettings income) but as he refuses to say what he’s done with the profits, I am unwilling to hand over any of my own money. I know I am entitled to complete disclosure but he is deliberately keeping the accounts from me. He says they are none of my business since I pay nothing towards utilities.

 

Some time ago he started working on renovating the adjoining barn. I had explicitly asked to be consulted beforehand and kept informed of any costs and developments along the way but he ignored this request completely and went ahead anyway, so I had no chance to agree or disagree to anything. I also insisted that we meet to put together a declaration of interests but he refused this also.

 

He now wants to buy my share but is offering what I see as an unfair sum. He is demanding payment for his labour and now states that he has spent nearly £20k of his own money and wants this back. I have told him that I am unhappy to pay for his labour as this was never agreed, but that I will pay my share of the costs as long as he can prove that he has paid for them out of his own pocket. He has sent me lots of receipts and invoices but no incomings (I know the house was being rented out for some time and we are talking over £20k in holiday let income) so I still do not know whether he has paid anything out of his own pocket. He is in fact refusing to show me any incomings or proof of whether it was declared to the tax office, which I strongly suspect it was not.

 

He has bombarded me with various letters and threats, stating that I have shown no interest in the property (not true, but made very difficult by his constant lack of communication, refusal to answer questions, etc) and that I must sell him my share and at his price. He has contacted a solicitor who has also sent me a letter and threatened me with court action for forcing a sale. He states that his business interests have increased since he has spent his own money on the place.

 

I would sell my share to him but I want a lot more than he is offering. I suggested that we get three estate agents to provide valuations for the property and go from there, which he did do, but the figures that came back I feel are all rather low and he has taken their absolute bottom valuations and given me the average. I would be happier to place the house on the open market at their top valuations and go from there but he does not want this to happen. He wants my share.

 

I know that now is not a great time to sell but he is trying to bully me into selling to him. The main question I have is whether he has a legal leg to stand on as such. As far as I am aware, if we did not put together a declaration of interests, as I suggested, then our stakes do not alter and it would take a lot for him to prove otherwise.

 

Things have become very nasty and he is behaving as if he owns the place. He has even gone so far as to threaten that he will call the police on me if I go there.

I'd be grateful for any informed thoughts.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome. If there is no legal debt ie, county court judgements etc against you by the relative, then no one can 'force' you to sell.

 

Are you part of a company or is this just a private deal between you and your relative? Are there papers to show who owns what and are these deposited with the land registry?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the welcome, Conniff - (apologies for seemingly just diving in with no introduction, not actually my first visit on here, lost original log-on details). I have no CCJ's but I understood there was a 'forced sale' procedure one could employ in circumstances such as these, no? This is a 'private deal' and it is registered at the LR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...