Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you. Can you explain what part needs to be amended. I’m sorry, I don’t understand which part is referring to right to reject. Should I be including  they are in breach of contract because the vehicle is not satisfactory quality. Clearly because of the way the windscreen was fitted it was not satisfactory quality when it was purchased and it has not remained in satisfactory condition for a reasonable period of time – witness the leakage and the corrosion in the car.    instead of    Therefore, I expect Doves to take responsibility for the costs incurred, as per the Consumer Rights Act 2015 “should a fault appear outside of 6 months, it's for the consumer to prove the fault was present at time of sale”     
    • I agree with you, UB. More parties might not be such a bad thing. More on Farage's manifesto - sorry, contract.  
    • Sorry but first of all you are still referring to your six-month right to reject – but you didn't assert your right within six months so this is not relevant. The situation is that you cannot reject the vehicle unless it is a write off or you have been deprived of the use of it for a significant period of time so that it can be said that you have been deprived of substantially the whole benefit of the contract. By my understanding that is not the case here. Your complaint must be that they are in breach of contract because the vehicle is not satisfactory quality. Clearly because of the way the windscreen was fitted it was not satisfactory quality when it was purchased and it has not remained in satisfactory condition for a reasonable period of time – witness the leakage and the corrosion in the car. On this basis you are holding them responsible for the cost of repairs which are £XXX and any ancillary costs reasonably incurred as a result of their breach of contract. You are currently without the car and this is not a situation which can continue. You are enclosing the evidence plus quotations for repair and you want that by the end of the week you want them to agree to the repairs. Broadly that. Please post a draft as soon as possible. You don't want to hang around on this
    • Hello folks  Got a letter from overdales the day after I submitted my defence this contains a copy of credit card agreement and a letter stating the account has been sold to lowell. H
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Marston Group - ignoring my official complaint - help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4393 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone help I am trying to formally complain about how Marston Group work and am getting no help from their complaints department.

In fact they are not even answering me.

 

Have already sent letters to OFT and MOJ but had no luck there either OFT "keeping on file".

Is their a relevant body I can contact or should I just instruct a solicitor?

 

Bit of background

- Received a request for an amount of money (£65) with no details of what it was in regard of or when it related too.

 

Wrote (18th Dec 2011) to them requesting this information and their court number to which I recieved no reply.

 

I stated that I couldn't pick up any mail until 12th Jan 2012 as I was away working.

 

Upon my return had recieved a warrant of distress increasing the initial bil to £335 apporx.

 

I have now paid this in installments even though I continue to protest that I do not have any idea about so called offence.

I supplied them with the car owners details.

However they operative took money from my account on 13th March without my permission.

 

Any help will be greatly appreicated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi,

 

If you have already complained to the Marston Group you can send a formal complaint to the Financial Services Ombudsman - financial-ombudsman.org.uk/faq/answers/complaints_a1.html

 

Monday to Friday – 8am to 6pm

Saturday – 9am to 1pm

 

  • 0800 023 4567
    free for people phoning from a "fixed line" (for example, a landline at home)

I've had a similar experience with this company, was going to go straight to the Ombudsman however I need to have made an initial complaint with Marston.

They are are not prepared to investigate and have the communication skills of a cape buffalo (not to be rude to the animal) I have been forced into paying something that I do not owe which has subsequently been increased to 305.00. The bailiff on three occasions tried to tell me i owed an extra £100!!! Each time I would not let this go and demanded proof, after 10 minutes of arguing on both occasions he proceeded to tell me I was a 'donut' and misheard him!! I don't think so! It is so easy to let these things go hassle free but there are vulnerable people out there and this man is manipulating his authority it should be taken off him and shoved up his backside. Work ethics??

 

Flo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Connor,

 

Bit confused as to what this debt relates to. You say that Marston Group requested an amount of £65. There can be no possibility that this can relate to a court fine as they are allowed by HMCS to charge am "admin fee" of £85 to the amunt of the debt. This would have meant that the letter would have asked for £65 PLUS £85.

 

Can you provide a bit more detail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Connor, the first thing to do is cancel your credit/debit card that marston have the number for. They will probably try and take more later. Old habits die hard it would seem-they did the same thing

to me when they were still Drakes. I took them to Court over it and they agreed to pay back all the money I had paid them plus my expenses after the Court found in my favour. So I know how

frustrating it can be to deal with companies like marston.

 

marston are one of a few companies that have a Debt Collection side and a bailiff side. At the moment their Debt Collection paperwork is so framed as to appear that it could be from their bailiff

department and I am disappointed that they can get away with it. So I suspect that the first approach to you was as a DCA and now as a bailiff once it went to Court.

 

Tomtubby is so much more knowledgeable than I so please follow TTs advice to sort your problem out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...