Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Egg/Barclaycard PPI


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4386 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sorry for hijacking this discussion, but I have the same issue with the same lender.

 

I had to send my fos questionnaire to Barclaycard as egg closed down and Barclaycard took my egg account over. I finally got around to calling hem today as I haven't heard anything since December. They told me they had sent a letter on 31st December, but I did not receive it. They confirmed they would send it again. They also communicated the jist of the letter. They explained that they had closed the claim due to me ticking a box when I applied for the credit card online.

 

I have owned two or three egg cards and I'm sure my first card was applied for back in early 2000. However I am guessing that Barclaycard will only investigate the last egg card I owned (the one transfered to Barclaycard).

This means I won't be able to claim for my previous cards as egg is no more.

 

My explanation to Barclaycard was that I would never agree to PPI as paying back borrowed money (interest) is expensive enough. I also had a scheme running at work. I didn't actually realise I was paying PPI as it never appeared on my egg statements. I only discovered I was paying PPI when I checked the transfered Barclaycard statement. It all makes you wonder why they closed egg down.

 

I just need to know whether to give up on this one or do I persist, if the later what is my next step?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG

 

I have started a new thread for you.

 

Egg were one of the big sinners for pre-ticked online applications.

 

You should be able to get all of the accounts investigated.

 

Have you done a Subject Access Request (SAR) to get as much information as you can on all the cards. If not I would do one...there is a template in the CAG library, the link to which is at the top of every CAG page in green.

 

Don't give up at the first hurdle.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ims

 

That was quick.

Sorry I'm new to this forum structure. I was despert to get some help after my disappointing phone call this morning.

I tried your "new thread" link but it didn't make sense.

Who would I address the SAR to, as egg are no more?

 

Thanks again ims

I can see the light, again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

You can address your SAR to the Data Compliance Manager at Barclays. I would do it to their registered office.

 

I'd also send it recorded so you know when they receive it.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thought I'd update my progress. Finally received a confirmation letter from Barclaycard this morning (two in fact - duplicates).

Their final comment on the letter is: "You may consider this letter to be our Final Reponse. Pleas be aware that we will not enter into further correspondence on this matter, however we will cooperate fully with the Financial Ombudsman Service if you choose to peruse your complaint with them".

 

Does this mean they will will refuse to send me information regarding my SAR application?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Finally received report history of my accounts with egg from Barclaycard. Information received gives details of current Barclaycard account, which I haven't had long so there's no point chasing PPI.

However the account I reported as miss selling PPI back in December 2011, which was refused due to me ticking the insurance cover tick box (according to Barclaycard) goes back to 17/06/2002, therefore could I claim that the tick box was all ready ticked, which was a form of miss selling?

 

There is also a third account. This must be the egg card I had before Barclaycard took over as it runs from 18/07/2011 to 28/10/2011.

 

The main account I need to chase is the one I have all ready claimed for. As Barclaycard have now advised me that "I can consider this letter to be their final response. Please be aware that we will not enter into further correspondence on this matter, however we will cooperate fully with the financial Ombusman service if you choose to peruse your complaint with them". How do I go about explaining to the Omusman that the account was opened in 2002 when the lenders followed a procedure of pre ticking the insurance cover tick box?

 

A bit confused and feeling like a loser.

 

Cheers

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Egg did indeed operate a pre-ticked box for a period of time which effectively meant the applicants had to "opt out". This is considered bad. Also in some instances we have heard that an application could not continue unless the PPI box was ticked.

 

If you are passing this over to fos you should be truthful in your replies as to what happened but you can mention that you are aware that Egg employed these practices and that you are aware that they were fined for their mis-selling of PPI.

 

Did you get copy statements going back to 2002 with opening and closing balances or just a transaction history going back to 2002?

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

my egg barclaycard prob is slightly different, i had a ppi claim declined by egg, i am persuing this at the ombudsman on the basis it was misold due to the fact as a company director i am effectively self employed an dtherefore the policy was 'missold' . The adjudicator has investigated and the allthough he is unable to yet give me a verdict he says that curremtly my case is in the legal department because its a case of who is responsible Egg or Barclaycard for what i presume will be a payout, anyone else had thsi prob?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to be honest, 2002 is a long time ago and I really can't remember the process I went through during the application. I kind of remember not being able to complete the application until I ticked a box but can't be sure.

 

The paperwork I have been sent is headed "Memo List & Detail". It's not really a statement and there are only two entries for 2002, one on 17/06 and the other for 16/12. Most of it is bank jargen. There are twelve pages that run up to 16/09/10.

 

At the present moment I feel like just giving up the fight, mainly because I have no proof.

 

Thanks for all the help

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you didn't get statements or a transaction history as a result of the SAR?

 

In which case you can send the failed SAR letter from the CAG library.

 

Have a look at the PPI stickies...you'll find a thread in there with notes for claimants. Have a read as there may be more criteria you can use for the mis-sale.

 

As you have had a final response from Barclays, if you do not fancy challenging them directly then you can pass the whole matter over to fos and give them copies of all that you have sent thus far to the lender. Also let them know of the criteria which you believe apply to the mis-sale.

 

Now Barclays have been known before to state that you cant claim on xyz account which is an attempt to fob people off. The fos may well see things dofferently and there is evidence on these forums where people have complained to fos on this point and fos have said that the bank are effectively talking nonsense.

 

If you pass it to fos you will need to be prepared for a long wait

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey ims21

 

Thanks for your response.

 

I did receive a dot matrix reem of transactions, however this was for my current credit card with Barclaycard, not the account I complained about.

 

What does passing all this information to fos entail. Time isn't really an issue, however will there be any fees to pay? Will I have to appear in court etc?

 

Thanks again

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

my case of '' no its not me its egg,..... says barclaycard..............no its barclaycard not egg'' has been with the FOS for 9 months, its been actively loooked at by adjudicator since jan , the whole thing is being held up by the eggcard barclaycard playground shenigans

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey ims21

 

Thanks for your response.

 

I did receive a dot matrix reem of transactions, however this was for my current credit card with Barclaycard, not the account I complained about.

 

What does passing all this information to fos entail. Time isn't really an issue, however will there be any fees to pay? Will I have to appear in court etc?

 

Thanks again

Mark

 

Hi

 

Passing to fos doesn't cost you anything. There is a case fee of £500 (May have risen to £850) but that is charged to the lender so doesn't affect you at all.

 

All you do with fos is complete their complaint form (available from their website) and then submit copies of everything you have sent and received from the lender. You are welcome to give additional details and information in a covering letter/report.

 

Going to fos does not involve court.

 

If fos do don't uphold your complaint then you can still use the court route of you wish

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

For the other posters, Barclaycard took over Egg. As such there is no Egg to be responsible...it is Barclaycard that are now the target. Think of it that BC took over Egg completely, lock, stock and barrel. Excuses that Egg are responsible is a fob off.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The adjudicator on my case gave me the impression that its an internal accounts thing ie if barclaycard cough up they get the money from egg etc. and that they ahve to get agreement as to who is repsonsible . I get more and more confused as the days go by.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...