Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Urgent advice needed!! - bailiffs for a court fine


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4481 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello there

 

Ive just had a call from bailiffs for a court fine I've not paid.

 

Apparently they were outside of a previous address that i lived in and were about to enter. This address was a correspondance address given to the court while I was between addresses...the bailiffs have made no attempt to contact my family home (which i registered when the offence was committed) and I have had no previous correpondance from them until now.

 

My question is, can they go to any previous addresses and enter property, or is it only the address on the paperwork they are allowed to enter? e.g. to my family home where I do not live (I am pretty sure they do not have the address, although they may be able to get ir from the internet as they have some other details)

Link to post
Share on other sites

31 views and nobody knows?

 

Can anyone advise me on something I have read on here called the 21 day rule?

 

Although I admit I am guilty of falling behind with my payment the bailiffs have doubled what I had to pay. Do i definitely have to pay this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just hang on in there! There might have been 31 people viewing your post but not everyone is au fait with court fines, etc, so best to wait for the right response rather than everyone just throwing in their six-penny worth.

 

Good luck!

 

Impecunious! :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the answer is yes, they can go to the address held on record with the court and if they have permission of the court to gain entry then yes they can force entry. Not sure what would happen if you were not living there. I suppose the bailiff would be taking a chance and might be faced with having to compensate the home owner for any loss incurred, e.g new lock/damage to door. It is probably their normal practice to check that the person does live there first and this is probably why you had the call. If you don't own anything at the address, then they would have nothing to levy on at the address and they should not hassle the current occupiers of the address.

 

Suggest that you make arrangement with the court/bailiffs to start paying the amount required. If you don't then they will just come to the address where you are resident and the costs will start to mount up.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The "21 day rule" is the period of time in which you can file a Statutory Declaration.

 

The Magistrate Court rules provide that a person may file a statutory declaration to cancel/rewind the process but this may only be done withn 21 days of becoming aware of the court fine.

 

This is a very common situation but as you have said above, you were aware of the fine and knew that you had fallen into arrears with payments to the court. For this reason you cannot file a Statutory Declaration.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...