Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If that is the first final notice you have received you can probably expect two or thee more to follow. This to test your resolve. They are hoping that these frightening 😃 letters will scare you into paying. After the third or fourth final demand they then have to decide  whether to actually proceed with a court claim or forget about you for a while. You were not the driver, their PCN is non compliant .No biggy.Slam dunk win for you.
    • This journo thinks Trump wants a Mafia state. I wonder if his supporters really want him to be immune if he orders a political assassination? The surest sign yet that Donald Trump wants to run the US like the mafia INEWS.CO.UK The Trumps want to make sure nothing like the rule of law stops them  
    • Yes. I'd be very interested to know how the defendant fared in putting forward the defence that the calaimant had been contributorily negligent by not keeping their cat under control. I'm aware that some people might find that fatuous, distracting or confusing, but the reality is that I'm not aware of any law that imposes a duty upon cat owners to keep their pets under control.  Whereas I believe the law does hold dog owners responsible for their dogs in public places. I'm not certain it was at all beneficial to the OP to suggest that blaming the claimant was a credible defence...
    • Okay, perfect. they did say BS is invoked as soon as i fill in their application form, ill get a pin. i had to press them more on this as they didnt want to discuss BS much. so i should fill in the form and get the pin, then i can initiate BS. What will follow and what should i do after? Thanks again for all the help and patience.
    • Good evening, so not a good weekend reviewing paperwork -- I have lost some proofs of postage.. also, although not provided at CCA, they have now supplied a DN in their WS, please see scan of claimants WS (without statements) Document with tick boxes as signatures doesn't look like an agreement and is split across pages. Documents have been stapled and copied multiple times looking at the top left of them. Aside from that, having read other threads, I suspect they have everything? appreciate your input please Sorry for heavy redactions, I noticed the paperwork was see-through LinkHalifaxCC1.compressed.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Black Horse Reject Claim For Charges


sploits
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4397 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I am currently helping out a friend who has an on going feud with Black Horse. Basically she bought a car and got the finance with Black Horse. Over the course of the finance she missed a few payments but always continued paying and eventually paid off the full value of what was originally owed. Black Horse had put charges on the account for missed payments and missed payment interest and the account is still not clear as the charges have added to the amount owed. I told her to get a copy of the CCA (which can't be supplied today but I can get it posted up tomorrow if need be) and a statement of account (so we knew what charges where on there). The CCA is just and so readable but I will fall back on that if I have to. I basically knocked up a claim back spreadsheet for all the charges they had added to the account (with the 8% compounded interest). Black Horse were asking for £450 and when I done the spreadsheet I got it to £626. With that we sent the letter asking for the difference to be paid back.

Over the weekend my friend has got a letter back from Black Horse basically saying that as she signed the agreement she was bound by the terms and conditions and the charges were still valid.

 

So basically we are just asking for some advice as what to do next? do we give up trying to claim the charges back and hope there is a flaw in the CCA? Do we have a response back to Black Horse telling them that they are wrong? Do we accept it and sort out a payment plan to pay back the £450?

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

 

Sploits

 

 

These are the links to what we have sent (the first 2 are the breakdown of charges and the 3rd one is the letter we sent). The last one is Black horses response

 

www.dj-sploits.co.uk/random/lisa/charges_Page_1.jpg

www.dj-sploits.co.uk/random/lisa/charges_Page_2.jpg

www.dj-sploits.co.uk/random/lisa/letter2bh.jpg

www.dj-sploits.co.uk/random/lisa/noaccept.jpg

 

 

pencil.png

Edited by sploits
Attachments were too small. Direct link added

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I wouldn't accept that their right and your wrong.

In 2006 the OFT made a decision that 'Unfair Charges' applied to customers accounts could only be levied at £12 maximum. They also said they were still unfair and it was for a court to decide what is deemed as fair.

Research the OFT report of 2006 and you should find your answers in there.

Was there any PPI included on the loan as this can be claimed back also.

Santander PPI X 2 **WON** claims on behalf of son (Oct 2010/ Mar 2011)

Citicard O/H (PPI) - **WON** Compound Interest Dec 2011

Citicard O/H (Charges) Bailiffs sent in August 2012

Barclaycard - **WON** Compound Interest Oct 2011

Monument - account information being sought for OH

Citicard - self - N1 submitted August 2012

Barclaycard - self - **WON** damages for non disclosure/information now rec'd. Aug 2012

Barclaycard - relation - Failed SAR sent 29/09/11

Halifax SAR sent 18/08/2011 for relation

LTSB - SAR sent 09/08/2011 for friend

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi shelley,

 

We have fired off a complaint to the FOS so we are going to see what we get back from them. If they can't help then we will send Black Horse the LBA and go down the court route. Do you know if there is anything we need to send to Black Horse in the meantime? They have sent a letter to demanding money within 7 days but obviously this isnt going to happen.

No PPI unfortunately

 

Cheers

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am unable to open your attachments to see the communications can you repost?

 

How far back do the charges relate to?

 

I'm not familiar with the rules behind sending them a letter saying 'Account in Dispute' but you could research that on here also. Template letters can be found in the top left corner in green.

 

FOS will have backlogs and will take some considerable time to resolve, it won't be an overnight resolution and FOS can only apply 8% interest.

 

If you go the court route you could claim interest in restitution. But make sure you are confident in your case and the courts process. If you lose and have to pay costs, they could be high.

 

Have a read through 'WON' threads on the Barclaycard link. There is plenty of useful advice/information available.

Santander PPI X 2 **WON** claims on behalf of son (Oct 2010/ Mar 2011)

Citicard O/H (PPI) - **WON** Compound Interest Dec 2011

Citicard O/H (Charges) Bailiffs sent in August 2012

Barclaycard - **WON** Compound Interest Oct 2011

Monument - account information being sought for OH

Citicard - self - N1 submitted August 2012

Barclaycard - self - **WON** damages for non disclosure/information now rec'd. Aug 2012

Barclaycard - relation - Failed SAR sent 29/09/11

Halifax SAR sent 18/08/2011 for relation

LTSB - SAR sent 09/08/2011 for friend

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm the links were working but not sure whats happened to them :)

 

Try these ones:

http://www.dj-sploits.co.uk/random/lisa/charges_Page_1.jpg

http://www.dj-sploits.co.uk/random/lisa/charges_Page_2.jpg

http://www.dj-sploits.co.uk/random/lisa/letter2bh.jpg

http://www.dj-sploits.co.uk/random/lisa/noaccept.jpg

 

Hopefully they will work. If not you can copy and paste the text and they shoudl then take you to the pages :)

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Morning all,

 

Over the weekend we recieved a nice letter from the FOS saying that the charges of £25-£30 are fine and we signed for them so we should pay them. Surely this isn't right? We are currently emailing the adjudicator about this stating what the OFT said in their April 2006 report but we aren't holding out much hope.

 

Anybody have any other ideas?

 

Thanks,

 

Sploits

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem, thanks ims21 we will knock up a letter before action (well doctor a template from here haha).

We will issue it and see what they come back with.

 

We were advised to contact the FOS regarding the unlawful charges so thats what we done but I guess its just been weeks wasted (although Black Horse have went quiet in this time).

 

Thank you again :)

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...