Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The case against the US-based ride-hailing giant is being brought on behalf of over 10,800 drivers.View the full article
    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Debenhams / HSBC Foul up - who tho?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4495 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Afternoon all, have a small problem, somewhere between HSBC and Debenhams, not sure which, both refusing to take responsibility and getting royally ****ed off with both now!!

 

Back Story

 

Purchased a tumble dryer from Debenhams on 28th Dec. Lovely tumble dryer, nothing wrong with it, would happily buy it again. Used a £50 gift voucher as well. Total price normally was £269, price with gift voucher £219. No probs there, the maths is good. This, theoretically, leaves just shy of £300 available in the bank. Thats AVAILABLE, not balance. The balance was something like £350.

Go forward a day and suddenly rent has been returned, water has been returned and TV license has been returned, all by bank, all for insufficeint funds. We're very much "wtf?"

Scratch our heads for a futher day because there's not even anything on the pending list online other than incoming Carer's Allowance for the following day 30/12.

Get to 30th, Carer's Allowance is in (this is a Friday btw), showing up quite happily in the bank on the balance sheet. Available balance = NIL

NOW I'm getting very annoyed. New Year's Eve party to pay for etc, loads of friends coming round, totally unable to purchase anything for it, numerous items returned, even tho money is showing in the bank but nothing available and nothing pending.

Goes on like this until the 3RD JAN when suddnely Carer's Allowance is available. Bit late but hey thanks anyways.

Go into the bank to query why it took 5 days for it to become available. Obtained from the bank an "Internal Transaction List" which shows the following:-

 

28th Dec: £269 Authorised to Debenhams

28th Dec: End of day Balance £306.48

29th Dec: £219 VISA Payment to Debenhams

29th Dec: Various reversals of different outgoing payments

30th Dec: £220 Carer's Allowance paid in

30th Dec: End of day Balance: £269

3rd Jan: TV License returned

3rd Jan: Various Items authorised

3rd Jan: End of day Balance £269

 

4th Jan: Go into branch to query. They say that because the amount was authorised and then taken separately it created a TOTAL debit of £490, mkaing the funds not available, and that its teh fault of Debenhams.

 

5th Jan Letter receievd from HSBC stating several items returned, oh and we're charging you £35 for it.

 

6th Jan: Six trillion phone calls and speakign to everyone in Debenhams EXCEPT the CEO, and they're saying that its the banks fault and that their internal procedures are nothing to do with them.

 

Now my arguement is that we bought ONE tumble dryer for £219, PERIOD. The money was there, it was available and now we're being stiffed for £35 of charges, had to cancel a high profile New Years Eve party, which would have been our severely disabled daughter's first one, at massive personal embarressment to us. Debenhams are refusing to take responsibility for it, as are HSBC. SOMEBODY, not us for once, is responsible for this. Normally I don't bother about compensation as I'm of the opinion we're too much of a compensation nation thses days. In this case I'm making an exception.

 

Where do I start?

Edited by Rayne

DCA's - they have the same power as an infinite number of untrained chimps working on a script for Hamlet, but the chimps would probably at least get it right :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I fear there is no clear answer and you will end up going around in circles - as you have found out, Debenhams will blame it on the bank and the Bnak will jsut say its not their fault.

 

I woudl be inclined to write a formal compalint letter to each. If you get no luck consider the financial ombudsman - but bear in mind it could take 6+ months to get an answer and even then they may not rule against the bank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what you're in effect saying is that I should just say the hell with it and just accept what is now £45 of charges through no fault of my own??? Would you? Would anyone? They're both getting stiffly worded complaint letters threatening everything including hell and eternal damnation. No way am I prepared to just lie down and play ***ing dead for these cretins

DCA's - they have the same power as an infinite number of untrained chimps working on a script for Hamlet, but the chimps would probably at least get it right :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, what I am saying is that you PROBABLY have a long battle that goes nowhere unless the bank or debehams admit fault early on.

 

If HSBC are saying its a fualt in the system whetehr caused by them or debenhams I would have thought they would have cancelled the charges with osme persuasion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah my apologies, read your reply at completely the wrong time (being hassled by kids!) and mis interpreted it :(

Have asked that HSBC refund or cancel the charges, awaiting their reply, going by past dealings with them, not holding out much hope

DCA's - they have the same power as an infinite number of untrained chimps working on a script for Hamlet, but the chimps would probably at least get it right :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

How's this look?

 

On 28th December 2011 I ordered a tumble dryer from your online store using a debit card and a £50 voucher that had been given as a gift for Xmas. Total cost without voucher £269, cost with voucher £219. Everything went through smoothly after phoning your 0871 number due to the use of the voucher. Or so I thought. And yes, the money was there and available before you think to query that.

 

The following day (29th), my bank account appeared to have no available balance, despite there being a substantial amount actually on balance, with more incoming the following day (30th). Assuming, incorrectly, that maybe it was just down to the fact that maybe a retailer had been a little slow submitting a payment over the Xmas period, I thought nothing more of it, other than some mild relief that I was again being paid the following day and so would be able to pay for the rest of the New Years Eve party on behalf of my disabled daughter, who is quite high profile locally (Google the name ****************)

 

The 30th arrived, the bank was checked, the balance showed the expected amount, however the available balance showed...zero, or as close to zero as makes no difference.

This carried on until I was able to get to my local HSBC branch (Gloucester) on 4th January and query matters. I managed to obtain from them a copy of what they call "Internal Transactions", which showed the following:

28th Dec £269 Auth Debenhams,

29th Dec £219 Visa Debit Debenhams

 

My first query is, why two separate transactions?

 

The result was that the two amounts were added together, thereby emptying the account and causing the items that were due out on 29th to be returned, incurring a nice total of £45 in returned item charges. I wouldn't mind too much if they were trivial things but each one was essential in its own right: rent, water authority and TV license.

 

This error, according to the bank, is down to Debenhams.

 

My second query is: what is going to be done to rectify this matter? At the end of the day, I purchased ONE tumble dryer, and for that have now been stuffed on charges through NOTHING that I have done other than to make a purchase from yourselves.

 

I have phoned Debenhams and this has resulted in being passed from one department to the next over the course of the majority of an afternoon, and aside from being met with more or less outright apathy ("not this department, dunno who deals with it") to complete pass the buck ("nothing to do with us"). As a result of this whole series of phone calls to Debenhams, I have been left with nothing but disgust for your company.

 

I expect both the charges to now be covered and, for the embaressment of having to explain to creditors why their items were returned, for the total humiliation of having to cancel a New Years Eve party for a locally high profile disabled child at the last moment, compensation in the region of a MINIMUM of 25% of the total retail value of the product in question at the time of purchase, and a written apology from no less that an area manager for the appalling way that this has to date been dealt with.

 

Failure to respond positively within 7 calendar days will see this complaint escalated to the office of the CEO, the Office of Fair Trading. BBC Watchdog, and any other media and / or regulatory body that I may see fit, including my Member of Parliament.

 

Yours, disgustingly annoyed

DCA's - they have the same power as an infinite number of untrained chimps working on a script for Hamlet, but the chimps would probably at least get it right :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...