Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • First begging letter received from Overdales   ;Blah blah blah, our client's are going to win this blah blah blah we supplied all your documents under CPR   PS you can stop all this by paying £1200 less in a lump sum
    • Right,  so the court hasn't send out the Directions Questionnaires/N180s yet. PE's one is a false one, meant to intimidate you into thinking your defence was rubbish and they are confident with their claim. This is par for the course.  The PPCs do this regularly. However, PE have gone further and written that "a copy has also been filed with the court" which is a lie as the court haven't even sent out the papers yet. Keep a screenshot of MCOL, later on in your WS you can draw attention to their lying and abuse of court procedure. If you've got time on your hands, then complain to the BPA about one of their members lying.    
    • We need documents to be uploaded in PDF format. Uploading in Microsoft Word format discloses personal details relating to you which you should not be sharing. Click upload – to understand what to do. How did you pay for the vehicle? You start by saying that you should have walked away – yes you should. Not only because of the reputation of this company but also if the transaction isn't perfect you shouldn't get involved and you certainly shouldn't be taking the word of some used car dealer. Big fail! Why are some of your letter in black and some the in red? When you get some of the ideas in there – have you use a template from somewhere else? They aren't interested in a delay caused by some fire alarm or something. They certainly aren't interested either by the distress you are suffering. They have hundreds of customers who become victims of this kind of thing. All of those customers suffer distress. Big Motoring World don't seem to be very bothered. What are the faults which exist with the vehicle now? Is it just the splashing? Where is the splashing? What is it that is splashing?   Do I also understand that you purchased the vehicle without trying it at all and the first time you were in it and had splashing was after you had made the contract?
    • A claim was issued against you on 22/04/2024 Your acknowledgment of service was submitted on 06/05/2024 at 13:28:08 Your acknowledgment of service was received on 07/05/2024 at 01:05:18 Your defence was submitted on 23/05/2024 at 21:20:03 Your defence was received on 24/05/2024 at 08:05:43
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Default notice for car finance


Lucifa42
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4575 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

On 27/10/11 our car was written off.

Our insurance company paid out the total loss settlement to the finance company, and there was a shortfall of about 1000 pounds.

We have gap insurance however, and put in a claim with them but it took some time as the Gap company requested a lot of documents so the full claim was not submitted until 18/11/11 and takes 10-15 days to settle.

We have been in contact with the finance company throughout and told them about the gap claim. Incidentally the finance company and gap company are owned by the same parent company.

Last week, on 28/11/11 we received a default notice from the finance company to our great surprise. We have not been in any payments arrears during our time with the finance, our monthly payment was taken as usual on 28/10/10 and again on the 28/11/11 (day we received the default notice).

What I'm asking really is: have they been hasty in issuing a default notice for this? We were more than happy to continue paying the monthly payments until the gap claim had been settled.

We have also been charged 30 pounds for the DN, something we are not happy about.

 

As it is, the gap claim has now been settled today so we are in advance of the date on the DN (12/12/11) so it should be all settled.

Oh and secondly: will this default notice be recorded on my credit record, or does only actual defaulted accounts get recorded?

 

Thank you

Apologies for the formatting in my posts, I do put paragraphs in but the forum removes them for some reason :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get onto the credit reference agencies and see what it says on there. If your payments have continued without a break I can't see what the DN is for.

 

Was the write-off a third parties fault or yours? If a third parties, I hope things are in hand to claim back every penny you are out of pocket.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I should have pointed out the DN is for breaking the terms of the finance agreement regarding the 'selling on' of the car. I suppose with the car being written off and the insurance company 'buying' it off me this is the clause I have broken. I would have thought though there was a special exclusion for 'selling on' if it's because of a write off.

I will be checking my credit rating as soon as I get home.

 

No third party was involved with the write off.

Apologies for the formatting in my posts, I do put paragraphs in but the forum removes them for some reason :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shame about the third party.

 

Be certain that the DN isn't accompanied with some sort of charge for you breaching the agreement.

 

This would really seem like and unfair term in the agreement and the 'un-necessary' default notice and marking of your credit file will have caused you distress and damage.

 

If there is a mark on your CF, then write telling them you want it off, use a court threat if they refuse or just change it to satiisfied and then carry out that threat if they fail to remove it.

 

The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999

 

and

 

The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Couldn't wait til I got home as I'm worried about this. Signed up for free trial with Experian (date in calendar marked to cancel it) :) and I can't see anything obvious in there about a default. My rating is 999 and there are no sections marked red.

So with it being settled now I should be ok, but still not happy about the £30 - I will write to them about that.

Apologies for the formatting in my posts, I do put paragraphs in but the forum removes them for some reason :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lou Cipher :)

check the terms of your agreement re accidents/writeoff. how can the insurer 'buy' the car from you as you say when they have dealt with the finance company and they still have title? the amount they paid out is short of your finance? so, you would be liable for the shortfall? but, your gap insurance covered the shortfall? so, if a default does appear, complain and get it removed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a few CRA's and they don't necessarily use them all, but the one they have used, if they have used one, must be told to you in a letter. Have another look to see if anything is there.

 

Don't let this worry you Lucifa, there is no crime or anything like that here, just a company who thinks they have found a way to make a few extra bucks. This is typical of finance and insurance companies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...