Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Labour Party has increased its poll lead over Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's Conservatives to stand 30 points ahead, according to a YouGov poll for the Times newspaper. A previous YouGov/Times poll, published on May 2, gave Labour a 26 point lead.   reuters.com WWW.REUTERS.COM  
    • rather than reducing the levels of c02 and nox in the atmosphere A VERY large increase   Record-breaking increase in CO2 levels in world’s atmosphere | Greenhouse gas emissions | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Experts issue warning after finding global average concentration in March was 4.7ppm higher than same period last year Global Monitoring Laboratory - Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases GML.NOAA.GOV The Global Monitoring Laboratory conducts research on greenhouse gas and carbon cycle feedbacks, changes in clouds, aerosols, and...   Global Monitoring Laboratory - Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases GML.NOAA.GOV The Global Monitoring Laboratory conducts research on greenhouse gas and carbon cycle feedbacks, changes in clouds, aerosols, and...    
    • This is the info that I have. Name of seller... Thomas Stone. Reg LG51UOV Driven 109,000 2001 ford escort van 55 Price paid £500. (I know that that's stupidly cheap for a van, but my son wanted to take it apart, and put it to gether again) His address st margarates drive gillingham kent. We live swindon, so over 2 hours away. My oldest sons machanic inspected it . Sorry I don't know if I'm reading this right, but NSR wheel cylinder leaking NSR Shock mounting corroded  Rear cross member corroded  Rear number plate light missing Brake compressor valve seized Hand break cables insecure O/S Seal to floor repairs are very badly done Dash lights are painted out Bonnet ( This is all he wrote here.) Brake pipes are covered in black doodoo ( This is what the machanic wrote). My son asked Thomas Stone if it would need lots of work, for it to pass its next mot,  Thomas Stone said , " I can't see it needing mega amounts of work, for it to pass, it isn't rotten and it starts and drives ok, and the brakes work well".             
    • Alan Bates is in the Guardian today. Our Post Office victory is being twisted by those who don’t want to see its like again | Alan Bates | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Litigation funders didn’t ‘exploit’ subpostmasters, they helped us. Those who attack them have corporate interests at heart, says former subpostmaster...  
    • Discover 8 skills you develop when you explore different points of view that are essential for life and work.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Adam v Nat West ***WON***


lead
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6338 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I trecieved my responce from Cobbetts, they have filed an Acknowledgment of service and have ticked the box "I intend to defend all of this claim". Is this good, bad or normal? has anyone else had this? if so what happened next?

 

I have not sent a list of my charges with the 8% interest to natwest since my Moneyclaim, should I still send it now they have responded and if so who to (natwest or cobbetts)?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

HI

 

Ok today was the last day (day 28) before I could apply for judgment and guess what Cobbetts at the very last minute put in a defence. My question now is what happens now and what are my chances of still winning as although I am prepered to go to court on the step by step guide it says that I should have had a refund by now and that this is highly unlikely, is this still the case or have things changed

 

Is any one at this stage or have been through this already and help and advice would be greatly appreciated

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Had Cobbetts defence through today, this si what it said:

 

1. This defence is filed and served without prejudice to the defendants case that the particulars of claim do not disclose reasonable grounds for bringing a claim against the claimant to recover the bank charges (and interest theron) referred to in the particulars of claim or any other sum(s). In the event that the claimant does not properly particularise his claim then the defendant will apply to strike out the claim and/or for summary judement in respect of the same.

 

2. On alllocation the defendant invites the court to direct taht there be a case managment conference in order for the court to cansider the making of appropriate orders to give the claimant oppertunity to properly particulise his claim.

 

3 No admissions are made as to what charges have been debited to the claimants bank account

 

4. In relation to the allegation that the contractual provisions pursuant to which the charges have been applied are unenforceable by virtue of the unfair contract terms act 1977 ("UCTA 1977") and/or the Unfair contract term in consumer Regulations 1999 ("the regulations") and/or the common law, the claimant is required to identify:

 

4.1 (a) the section(s) of unfair contract terms act ("UCTA 1977"); (b) the regulations of the unfair contract terms in consumer regulations 1999 ("the regulations"); and © the principles of common law relied upon by the claimant in alleging that the contractual provision(s) reffered to are unenforceable; and

 

4.2 the contractual provision(s) that the claimant allege are invalid by referance to UCTA 1977 and/or teh regulations.

 

Until such time as these sections/regulations/provisions are identified the defendant cannot (save as appears below) plead to allegation reffered to in paragraph 4 above. the defendant therefor reserves its right to plead further to the allegation once (and if) the claimant identifies the relevant contractual information

 

5. Save as hereinbefore appears the defendant joins issues with the claimant on his claim(s) and denies that it is liable to the claimant as alleged or at all

 

 

Can anyone please tell me what I should do next ie. how should I reply? With regards tp para 3 I sent the details of my calim on october 30th recorded delivery and what a suprise they havnt recieved or signed for it, so that is easily sorted, I however dont know whare to start with para 4.

 

I also dont know what para 5 means

 

Can anyone tell me anything about this letter and if it is normal or bad and what I should do next. Has anyone else had a letter simlar??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Today I recieved a letter from Cobbetts with the usual our client considers that my challengers would fail in cort etc however as a good will gesture they offed me £900 (I am claiming £1800)

 

I am just wondering what the best way to reply is to say thanks but no thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Something short and to the point along the lines of:

 

Dear [named sender or Sirs]

 

Thank you for your letter dated xx/xx/xx.

 

I respectfully decline your offer of settlement and request, once again, that you return to me all charges imposed on this account, interest and court fees now totalling £xxxx

 

I will accept the sum offered only as part settlement and on the clear understanding that I will pursue recovery of the remainder.

 

I will be willing to withdraw my claim upon receipt of unconditional full settlement of my claim.

 

I trust this clarifies my position.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Yes I have just been reading all of the other posts and I am just writing the letter. After reading everyones posts I am feeling quite confident now as alot of other people seem to have had the same responces as me and won

SO FINGERS CROSSED!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thanks for you advise, Glad to hear that you won, I have read everything twice and still worry im doing it right lol there is nothing better than when you realise other people have had the same responce and won however there is nothing worse than when you read something that is different to the way you have done it lol.

 

I will keep you posted on what happens but hopefully not long now

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read it "THRICE", it took me a long time to realise that there are moderators of excellent quality on this site, please use them.

You Will Win, of that I have no doubt, I'll keep on looking at your thread.

cheerio CHRIS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I recieved my court date yesterday for the 23rd January

 

It says that I must send a copy of all documents that I intend to rely on during the hearing to al partys by the 9th January, can anyone help with what I may need.

 

Thanks

 

P.S does anyone know where I can get a copy of the interview it mentions with Peter McNamara in the FAQs

Link to post
Share on other sites

:D I'VE WON!!!:D

JUST PICKED UP MY MAIL AND THERE WAS A CHEQUE FOR MY FULL AMOUNT!!

THANKS FOR EVERYONE WHO HELPED

Good luck to every one else, time to start on my other 3 accounts now!!

MERRY CHRISTMAS!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

CONGRATULATIONS LEAD

 

I bet that was a bit of a surprise being as your court date was not until late Jan. One thing I wanted to ask... you know you said earlier that you put down the 8% on the prelim letter and schedule by mistake??? Well, I too have done that... and then later realised that this 8% was not supposed to be claimed until the court part... Well did anything happen about that??? Did the bank say you had done it wrong, or was nothing said?? I assume your settlement was with the 8% also??

 

Are you claiming against other banks now???

 

Enjoy your hard earned dollar!!

 

Maxine

Moodle

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...