Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks dx for your kind words. I plan to renew my season ticket and write a new begging letter as following, can I ask for any suggestion about it?   Dear Investigator/Prosecutor,   Thank you for your reply. I deeply regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused.   I’m extremely remorseful for my crime. and regret it everyday. I often ask myself ‘’how can I do that thing just because I felt it is interesting. There are a lot of crimes in the world, but feeling it’s interesting is certainly not a reason to crime. I should not crime with any reason.’’ I think about these things every day, and I understand that I can’t blame anyone but myself.   I thanks to the staff who stopped me, as this is a valuable lesson in my life. I told myself that I should never ever repeat such a thing again, and never ever do anything which is possible to be in breach of any law. As a result, I carefully tap my oyster card every time before I enter the station now. I remind myself that I did a wrong thing before, and I should never let it happen again.   Although my monthly travel expenses do not warrant a season ticket, but I just renew my season ticket (please see the attachment). I understand that a crime cannot be truly compensated for, but purchasing a season ticket offers me a small measure of comfort, knowing that my actions caused a loss to the public interest.   I received an email which ask me to negotiate being class teacher in this summer (please see the attachment). I hope that I could teach the lovely students again, which may not be allowed with a criminal record. I would please ask that you would please provide me a single opportunity to settle all outstanding sums owed outside of court without the need for legal proceedings which would have a determinantal impact on my teaching career.   I sincerely apologise again for my crime. If you need anything further from me to help you please let me know.    Yours sincerely,
    • You did what??? You asked them to send you the documents that without them you had  a 100% ironclad win in Court. Why on earth would you do that? As it happens in this case, there is still enough mistakes in their PCNs and the NTH to have your case cancelled. Amd it may be that not sending those documents in the first place along with the ICO complaint and the letters from Alliance themselves which would confirm by the dates on the letters may be enough to cancel it anyway. I hope you have kept their letters as evidence? The chances are that Alliance will not actually take you to Court because of their errors but you never know.  You have made so much extra work for yourself in your WS if they decide to push their luck.though. Can you please post up their letter where they give the reason why I wasn't sent with the NTH.
    • I'm not sure that I fully agree with my site team colleague above.  My understanding is that there is nothing to stop you recording but it is strictly for your own personal use.   
    • I live in a student house, with 5 tenants, unihomes is our utilities provider, who we each have a direct debit set up with and have paid each bill every month. Two letters were sent in my name by BWLegal saying I had two outstanding payments due adding up to over £3500, I have tried to contact british gas (as that is apparently our houses provider) as well as Unihomes. Nothing has helped and BWlegal are pursuing legal action if these debts are not resolved by the 1st May. What do I do? I've called Bwlegal when i bring up that the debt isnt for me and for unihomes they hang up on me. so I am stressed and do not know what to do
    • cant do either if its not in a public place or on your land. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Changing claim amount from Prelim to LBA


redsue
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6217 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Taylormandy - let me see what I can do about joining you - can't promise anything but will try to come for moral support.

Debt Mountain - I hope you too enjoyed your hols - can you remind me? Are you going after the same as me? 24.9% unauthorised?

What was NW defence? Did they send you a copy of their AQ? Is Berwick Magistrates court close to you?

Sorry for the 20 questions I'm just checking to see whether we are all in the same boat

PLEASE sign this petition to reduce amount of time CRAs hold your data

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/CreditRA

 

I HATE MBNA :evil::-x:mad::-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 415
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Actually, it went in 22nd, but the fees were a cheque and despite being told it would make no difference, I wonder if they waited for it to clear before sending paperwork to NW?

 

(it has cleared, so I know they have processed it)

G.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Taylormandy - let me see what I can do about joining you - can't promise anything but will try to come for moral support.

Debt Mountain - I hope you too enjoyed your hols - can you remind me? Are you going after the same as me? 24.9% unauthorised?

What was NW defence? Did they send you a copy of their AQ? Is Berwick Magistrates court close to you?

Sorry for the 20 questions I'm just checking to see whether we are all in the same boat

I have posted (5 minutes ago) the defence in my thread. Holidays in Tenerife were excellent all 3 of us had a great time on our Bank of Scotland sponsorred break and we booked up again for June (not sure who is paying for that one, might have to pay it myself...;) )

I am claiming for loss of savings interest at the esaving rate of 4.85% (at the time of claiming) and sundry costs.

Berwick is about 1hr 15 mins from me on a bad day.

 

Feel free to question away. I am now also starting to look into the greater than 6 year threads as I may try down that route soon. Nationwide/Bank of Scotland and Clydesdale all owe me a fortune from the 90's.

If I have helped click my scales....

 

Find my threads by clicking here

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, it went in 22nd, but the fees were a cheque and despite being told it would make no difference, I wonder if they waited for it to clear before sending paperwork to NW?

 

(it has cleared, so I know they have processed it)

in my experience they don't wait for it to clear, just atkes a coupl eof days for any backlog they may have. Just call them and they are normally very helpful at the courts.

If I have helped click my scales....

 

Find my threads by clicking here

Link to post
Share on other sites

in my experience they don't wait for it to clear, just takes a couple of days for any backlog they may have. Just call them and they are normally very helpful at the courts.

 

I'm sure they would be helpful, if they were working. Phone line just has a message about industrial action today.

 

Lovely.

G.

Link to post
Share on other sites

right then, I'm sending this to MR Bacon today, any comments, thoughts....

 

For your information, please find enclosed a copy of the Allocation Questionnaire and reply to your defence that was sent to St Helens County Court on 12th December 2006.

 

I request you supply me with a complete and thorough breakdown of the charges which were refunded previously, as described in your letter dated 12 October 2006. Plus a complete breakdown as to how you arrived at the figure of £545.90 ‘to cover loss of interest’ within 14 days of this letter.

 

Furthermore, I request you supply me with a copy of the original Terms and Conditions of the above accounts at the time in which they where opened.

 

The court has notified me that the case is now with the Judge for allocation. I am in the hope that both parties can negotiate a settlement in order to avoid wasting valuable court time. In which case I require an additional payment of £1,601.35.

 

Can I also remind you that payment of £545.90 implies an admission of my entitlement to receive compound contractual interest and that the only issue now remaining for the court to decide is to have the defence struck out on the basis that the Defence does not comply with CPR 16.5(2) or the interest rate.

 

I look forward to hearing from you with the information requested within 14 days of this letter.

PLEASE sign this petition to reduce amount of time CRAs hold your data

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/CreditRA

 

I HATE MBNA :evil::-x:mad::-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi sarahpp - I've been subscribing to that thread also - keeping an eye on things but not jumping in - so to speak.

I'm glad that we're trying to get our heads together regarding the outstanding interest that the banks don't think we are due but need to decide what we are going to screw it down with - I'm going for mutality and repriocity - and will keep reading and reading with great interest - its certainly a long road we've all travelled down since we began and a great learning curve - along with getting together with some really really nice people. I think I'm actually enjoying myself!!!:D

PLEASE sign this petition to reduce amount of time CRAs hold your data

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/CreditRA

 

I HATE MBNA :evil::-x:mad::-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad to hear it!!

 

It is difficult just having the one big thread on contractual and then, everyone's individual claims here, there and everywhere but, hopefully there are plans afoot to formalise and collate things a bit more which can only make life easier!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Garu

Yes the fools said I wasn't entitled to contractual rate and I was only entitled to S69 but from what they have paid me they have paid 7.75% authorised - I sent Mr Bacon I letter yesterday (post 309) asking for a complete breakdown of their calculations - but I'm not holding my breath for a reply.

Just waiting on the Judge now for a date.

PLEASE sign this petition to reduce amount of time CRAs hold your data

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/CreditRA

 

I HATE MBNA :evil::-x:mad::-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok , question everyone...why would Nationwide state in their allocation questionnaire that they want the case to go to multi track and why do they think it will take 1 day in court... scare tactics me thinks...

PLEASE sign this petition to reduce amount of time CRAs hold your data

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/CreditRA

 

I HATE MBNA :evil::-x:mad::-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok , question everyone...why would Nationwide state in their allocation questionnaire that they want the case to go to multi track and why do they think it will take 1 day in court... scare tactics me thinks...

 

redsue, if they ticked anything other than small claims they would have had to give a reason on the form. do you have a copy?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok , question everyone...why would Nationwide state in their allocation questionnaire that they want the case to go to multi track and why do they think it will take 1 day in court... scare tactics me thinks...

 

 

A last ditch attempt to panic you

 

Multitrack - because they want you to start worrying about costs

 

1 day in court - because they want you to worry about being stressed in court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

your claim is under £5k - they would need to give a very good reason and even then I believe I'm right in saying you could request that costs under the small claims track rules should apply. Plus I think you would get an allocation hearing (pre-trial hearing) before the judge would agree to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...