Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If I haven't referred to it before then please check out this thread another case where the claimant contracted directly with Packlink for a courier delivery service carried out by Evri. Please read this thread very carefully and eventually you will get to a point where the claimant – our OP – discovered some interesting terms and conditions and has referred to them in his case. He incorporated these into his witness statement and was given judgement – not on the basis of rights of third parties but on the basis of direct responsibility. I would suggest that use the witness statement as a model although we will want to see it before you file it off. When you find the particular post with the witness statement, please can you post a link to it here as well as a copy of the witness statement because I don't have the time to look for it at the moment and the thread is rather long. However it is very important to you and you should go through it very carefully indeed. We have applied for a transcript of the judgement and hopefully it will be along in six weeks or so. As soon as we receive it we will make it available on this sub- forum.
    • Yes they are criminal charges. The law requires you to stop/report if "...owing to the presence of a mechanically propelled vehicle on a road or other public place an accident occurs by which— [injury or damage to a third party or their property is caused]. "I would be disinclined at this stage to offer anything more than you do not believe any such accident took place.  You could provide a brief description of the altercation in an attempt to explain why another party might be making these allegations. I know it's a silly question, but are you sure that you did not collide with anything? Could you have mistaken hitting something for the other party thumping your car? Could it be that you passing closely caused him to damage something somehow?  
    • Thank you. They insisted that they claim they have an "allocated settlement" figure per day. Make a note of this and make sure it gets into your witness statement and onto the judge. This is a scandal and even more evidence of the abuse of the system. It has nothing to do with justice. It is purely economic's for them. Once again, insist on seeing their contract with Packlink. You shouldn't take their word for anything without evidence. Also standby as I will post a link to a similar case where a very interesting discovery has been made about Packlink's terms and conditions and how Evri are responsible to you in any event. We are applying for judgement on that. It will take about six weeks. I'm sure it will be available by the time you go to trial. Also, it is outrageous that they wasted your time and the mediator's time agreeing to compromise when they already had a fixed sum in mind. This is not about compromise, this is about setting a condition from which they will not move. This is an abuse of the court process. It is an abuse of the mediation process. Make sure it all goes into the witness statement. The judge needs to know  
    • Update: they actually showed up to mediation this time. The mediator seemed pretty understanding that I had a previous claim with Evri last year where they didn't show up to mediation and ended up settling in full before court. And how evri are infamous for following this "dragging out protocol" even when they will lose. Evri spoke the usual speil of my contract is with packlink not them, to which i briefly explain to the mediator the Rights of Third Parties Act 1999 etc. Best they could offer was a "goodwill guesture" of £20 plus covering the court fees so £55 total. Said they have an "allocated settlement amount per day". the mediator could already tell it wasn't going nowhere so we had no deal.
    • The payer is not responsible for registering and making sure that VAT is charged correctly.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4638 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i have been a tenant for 30 years (protected) i now have a new landlord and owner of the property

i have used an upstairs patio area for my washing since i have lived here. i got a letter saying that they had a report that i was hanging out my washing and this is a breach of the lease and to stop or they wil take further action

now i dont have any new tenacy agreement with my new landlord so how can i be doing anything wrong?

also the new owner has asked the tenants next door to keep a dosier on my family to inform them if i do anything wrong, they are trying to get me out but i have not done anything wrong they want to sell the property

could any body help with what i should do

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You do not need to have signed a lease with the new owner, everything in your original lease still applies, but with the new owners name in place of your original landlord.

 

If it was 30 years ago, do you still have the original agreement? Check what the terms and conditions say about laundry - or anything that might be construed similar. I would write a polite and professional letter to the landlord saying that you want to make sure that you do not breach any more of the lease conditions and ask for a copy of the lease. That way, you have a copy if anything does kick off. If the landlord fails to supply a copy (he doesn't have to) then ask the local councils 'Tenancy Relations Officer' or 'Private Rentals Officer' (or similar) for help - the landlord may be more forthcoming to someone in authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thankyou for your reply

i only have a written letter confirming that i can use the area for washing from my prevoius landlord,

it does not say on my agreement anything about washing.

surely though if i still follow the original rent agreement under a proted tenacy then the new land lord cannot give me a new agreement with different terms applied

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that he new landlord can not impose new terms.

 

I am not sure if the 'letter' from your ex-landlord counts as contract, or whether it can be withdrawn by the landlord.

 

However, I stand by my suggestion that you write to the new landlord asking for a copy of the (original) contract - because this will make him realise that whatever lease he is refering to, is not yours!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have been a tenant for 30 years (protected) i now have a new landlord and owner of the property

i have used an upstairs patio area for my washing since i have lived here. i got a letter saying that they had a report that i was hanging out my washing and this is a breach of the lease and to stop or they wil take further action

now i dont have any new tenacy agreement with my new landlord so how can i be doing anything wrong?

also the new owner has asked the tenants next door to keep a dosier on my family to inform them if i do anything wrong, they are trying to get me out but i have not done anything wrong they want to sell the property

could any body help with what i should do

thanks

 

Hello spacemarine

 

Do you mean you have a Regulated tenancy,under 1977 Rent act ? if yes there may be a copy of

the original rent agreement held by The rent service/voa office,if your rent is registered as a fair rent.

 

https://ebusiness.voa.gov.uk/err/SearchRegisterForm.aspx

 

The new LL cannot impose or force a new tenancy agreement on you,it would be against the law to impose a new tenancy agreement on a existing regulated tenant or lease holder.

 

Can i ask just out of interest are any of existing tenants,regulated tenants or long lease holders like yourself.

Edited by 45002

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have been hanging the washing out for 30 years I do not see how the landlord can stop you now.

 

Agreed, the rule lof Estoppel may well apply, which basically says youve been doing something for so long its a bit late now to suddenly complain about it.

 

Now Im not sure about rented properties but in leasehold properties, if the tenant pays and the landlord accepts ground rent each year, this is taken as an admission that all is well and he has accepted any alleged breaches.

 

My knowledge is based on leasehold properties, where someone has bought a property but doesnt own the land so has to pay a freeholder, normally ground rent and service charges, but the obligations within the lease are roughly the same, and yes, hanging out washing is often in there, my lease says something about that.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing about the neighbours keeping tabs on you is wrong! Have you considered going to the CAB?

 

Not sure what you mean by 'wrong', the landlord is perfectly entitled to ask this, although most people with any sense would say no, if they were to get too closely involved in their 'spying' they lay themselves open to claims of harrasment and this could be taken against the landlord too.I still believe the Estoppel element may be the strongest defence.. See here > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EstoppelAndy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Wouldnt what the landlord has done by involving the neighbours be

 

1. Invasion of Privacy.

2. Harrassment.

3. A Breach of the Data Protection Act as he has no right discussing your problem with said neighbours.

 

Yous should seek advice from CAB

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stu,

does membership of HomeWatch or FarmWatch make us all guilty of what you suggest or Police Informers (unpaid)?

I would need strong arguments for your 3 points.

 

I see no suggestion new LL is trying to add a new condition to the Lease only enforce a pre-existing one. Copy of orig Lease would confirm. Previous LL letter may be regarded as a 'waiver'.

Who else (other Ts) have right of access to patio area. New LL may have had a complaint from another recent T.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Wouldnt what the landlord has done by involving the neighbours be

 

1. Invasion of Privacy.

2. Harrassment.

3. A Breach of the Data Protection Act as he has no right discussing your problem with said neighbours.

 

Yous should seek advice from CAB

 

1. No such law (in uk)

 

2. Yes, although from what the landlord has done so far unlikely to amount to this.

 

3. Prob would depend on whether this was a company that had applied for permission to hold data, although maybe similar to Debt Collectors who sometimnes used to call on neighbours but this action whilst not illegal is certainly frowned upon.

 

There is also the 'right to quiet enjoyment', this is a standard clause in most (long if not short) leases and basically is similar to harrasment.

 

We appear to be going a bit of track here though, the original question is about hanging out washing, it is true that many leases do not allow this and in theory a landlord can take a tenant to court and even force forfeiture of their home in extreme examples, again, my knowledge is about LONG leasehold properties but I believe the same applies to short term rents/leases.

 

See here for a list of Court (LVT) decisions regarding breach of (long) leases > http://www.lease-advice.org/lvtdecisions/tables.asp?table=6

 

You will find there are many realkting to wasahing and also lamintae flooring, making noise, subletting,owning pets , etc

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

many thanks for your replys

the situation i find myself in is quite complicated my flat is in one building and is owned by my landlord but the freehold is owned by the person next door as well asthe house next to mine, when both properties where sold i was in their way as i could not be moved out as im a protected tenant, so im sitting on their profit cause they cant sell the flat for the true market value so the owners are trying to make our lives a misery they complained to my landlord about the washing and they are keeping a dossier on my family. the owner said if i ddid one thing wrong then the landlord would have me out in a flash ( iwish i had that on tape) I find that I am now living with this costant fear of my family making too much noise or if we are doing something wrong, it has ruined my wifes health as she has had a suspected heart attack due to all the stress, we are just a normal family we dont have raves in the middle of the night. i have asked for leagle advice and they told me to get a copy of the new lease

so things are going forward.

thank you every body who has helped

Link to post
Share on other sites

many thanks for your replys

the situation i find myself in is quite complicated my flat is in one building and is owned by my landlord but the freehold is owned by the person next door as well asthe house next to mine, when both properties where sold i was in their way as i could not be moved out as im a protected tenant, so im sitting on their profit cause they cant sell the flat for the true market value so the owners are trying to make our lives a misery they complained to my landlord about the washing and they are keeping a dossier on my family. the owner said if i ddid one thing wrong then the landlord would have me out in a flash ( iwish i had that on tape) I find that I am now living with this costant fear of my family making too much noise or if we are doing something wrong, it has ruined my wifes health as she has had a suspected heart attack due to all the stress, we are just a normal family we dont have raves in the middle of the night. i have asked for leagle advice and they told me to get a copy of the new lease

so things are going forward.

thank you every body who has helped

 

Hi...So your situation is that the owner ofthe flat is your landlord.There is a seperate person who owns the freehold (who is in effect your landlords landlord).Who is putting the pressure on you ?Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes thats the bottom line, a rather nasty little woman who is a justice of the peace believe it or not

she wants us out so that she can sell the flat

i have been a tenant for 30 years (protected) i now have a new landlord and owner of the property

i have used an upstairs patio area for my washing since i have lived here. i got a letter saying that they had a report that i was hanging out my washing and this is a breach of the lease and to stop or they wil take further action

now i dont have any new tenacy agreement with my new landlord so how can i be doing anything wrong?

also the new owner has asked the tenants next door to keep a dosier on my family to inform them if i do anything wrong, they are trying to get me out but i have not done anything wrong they want to sell the property

could any body help with what i should do

thanks

 

 

 

Hello spacemarine

 

Do you mean you have a Regulated tenancy under 1977 rent act ? and is your rent registered as a fair rent under the same act ?

 

Does your rent register show up when you enter your full post code in the below link ?

 

https://ebusiness.voa.gov.uk/err/Sea...isterForm.aspx

 

Can i ask just out of interest do you know if any of existing tenants in the same block/house as you, have a Regulated tenancy or are long leaseholders ?

Edited by 45002

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

question 1 yes

question 2 yes

question 3 im the only tenant in the building the flat downstairs is up for sale and empty the existing tenants next door are not protected tenants

 

my tenacy began before 1989

 

Thanks for the reply

 

As you have a Regulated tenancy same as me,i can see why your new LL wants you out,to up the rent with new T.

 

Your new LL will never be able to get full market rent for your flat,due to the Rent act and will never be able to evict you due to you having a Protected Tenancy.

 

If there was a tenancy agreement when you 1st moved in 30 years ago,that would still be valid and your new LL is stuck with it,dont sign any think your new LL gives to you.

 

If your new LL start to harass you,keep a diary of goes on,pictures,videos of any damages caused by the LL,even voicing recording if you have a Dictaphone of any verbal threat.

 

In the case of harassment by a LL,you would need to contact your local council housing dept,private tenancy enforcement unit,they are the people who can take actions against a LL for harassment or illegal evictions..

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

today i sent my landlord a letter asking how puzzled i am that after putting the washing out in the same place for 30 years, that i have in some way contravened my tenacy agreement, I have also asked to see a sighned copy of my tenacy and to please highlight the section that forbids me to hang out my washing

contravening the tenacy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

today i sent my landlord a letter asking how puzzled i am that after putting the washing out in the same place for 30 years, that i have in some way contravened my tenacy agreement, I have also asked to see a sighned copy of my tenacy and to please highlight the section that forbids me to hang out my washing

contravening the tenacy.

 

Well..if it were me I wouldnt of written that letter because you are admitted a breach, would of been best to say nothing and let them prove it, should it ever get that far.You may find the lease prohibits hanging out washing (just had a look at mine and it has same clause), althought whether a tenancy agreement does is another matter but It may say you have to abide by terms of lease.Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

As the OP has a Regulated tenancy and if there was a tenancy agreement,only that TA would be binding on the RT.

 

If the was a original tenancy agreement,The Rent service/voa may hold a copy.

 

Any lease holder agreement is the LL problem,not the RT !

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
well they ignored my letter and have now given me 7 days to stop hanging out my washing or they will take legal action

 

saturday night drive are you posting as spacemarine

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/member.php?86623-spacemarine

 

 

or saturday night drive ?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?279321-fair-rent-increase&p=3152564#post3152564

 

Having 2 accounts is very confusing !

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...