Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok Thank you DX will do just that . will keep you up dated.
    • dispute it with whichever cra provider is now showing it. simply state the a/c is from 2015 and was defaulted (date) and should not have re appeared. probably getting ready to sell it on. dx
    • Hi Caught Shoplifting at John Lewis - Retail loss Prevention/Other shoplifting allegations. - Consumer Action Group Thanks a lot for commenting this experience of yours. I do understand this might be something that you are not willing to talk about anymore but the same exact scenario happened with me today at John Lewis. They took my name/ address/ a picture of me holding a signed banned letter. the only questions I've got are... will I be contacted by the police will this be recorded as police caution or criminal record?  I would really really appreciate if you could let me know how it went.  I am so so so ashamed of myself and am really making changes in my life I feel like I've lost myself for a period of my life but anyways it would be really great to hear back. Thanks 
    • I thought Delinquent ment "missing payments" its active so assumimg it can be seen ? also this is the only thing change on my credit file and that in its self being re added has dropped my credit score . the debt is SB and did drop off my credit file so how have or how can they re add it again ?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Need help to close Limited company after visit from Enforcement officer


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4571 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Many thanks so far Ploddertom.

 

Assuming I get the judgement set aside and the 'stay'; what next?

 

I posted all the details of the case on the forum the other day, and the consensus was that the case is a little complicated, and one that I may not win. Is it a simple case of closing the company, and all my problems go away?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks so far Ploddertom.

 

Assuming I get the judgement set aside and the 'stay'; what next? Depends on what & if the Judge orders.

I posted all the details of the case on the forum the other day, and the consensus was that the case is a little complicated, and one that I may not win. Is it a simple case of closing the company, and all my problems go away? just because the Co closes does not mean the debt floats

 

There is no guarantee you will be given either a Stay or Set Aside. Having said that the Stay can be granted solely on the basis you cannot afford the Fees charged - this Order can even be made absolute but mostly they are given until such time another event happens - Set Aside for example.

 

Whilst Set Aside can be granted for not having received the original Court papers, some judges look beyond this and want to know could you have paid up at the beginning, did you actually ever owe the debt concerned, is the amount claimed correct etc etc. There is no good applying for Set Aside only to be back in the same situation again as you could not pay. If your debt is for a Ltd Co and you did not personally guarantee it then they probably stand no chance anyway.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no guarantee you will be given either a Stay or Set Aside. Having said that the Stay can be granted solely on the basis you cannot afford the Fees charged do you mean the court fees ?- this Order can even be made absolute but mostly they are given until such time another event happens - Set Aside for example.

 

Whilst Set Aside can be granted for not having received the original Court papers, some judges look beyond this and want to know could you have paid up at the beginning, again, do you mean the court fees or the debt?, did you actually ever owe the debt concerned, is the amount claimed correct etc etc. There is no good applying for Set Aside only to be back in the same situation again as you could not pay. If your debt is for a Ltd Co and you did not personally guarantee it then they probably stand no chance anyway. Should I put more details about why I don't believe I owe this money, or would that be too much information for the Claimaint at this stage?

 

PT

 

Many thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Before you read, please be aware that I'm writing with regards to a Limited company to Limited company dispute. If you would like to know the whole story, then please feel free to read my only other two posts in the last few days.

 

From my experience today, it seems you cannot go to just any court in the land to set a judgement aside and/or stay of writ without first having the case transferred from the issuing court; in my case it was Northampton County Court Bulk Centre.

 

As I was told a few hours ago, it is at the local courts discretion to phone Northampton Bulk centre and ask for the case to be transferred to them so that a judgement or writ of stay can be dealt with at the local court. Given the current financial strain on Local councils, and it being a Friday afternoon, my local county court told me to speak with Northampton Bulk Centre as they could not deal with it and they promply produced a print out from a 'gov.uk' website that said something about a 'stay of writ' being dealt with at the issuing court.

 

Anyway, I got home and straight on the phone to Northampton. They explained that I had to fill out form N244 twice (£80 x2), one to set the judgement aside and another because the Writ of Fi Fa was issued by the High Court which incidently can be issued to a Directors personal address.

 

I must say that Northampton Bulk Centre whose help teams I've spoken with 3 times now are quite helpful, and apparently I was on a Priority list (thankfully), so I paid them over the phone, emailed them the two forms, and was told that whilst my forms are being processed, Marston Group, the HCEO cannot enforce the Writ of Fi Fa (i.e. cannot turn up at my house to take things away), and that their system automatically notifies them of this. As much as I'm grateful to Northampton Bulk Centre help desk, I'll still be phoning them on Monday to ask for an update.

 

Also, because its a company to company dispute, the local court to which it will be referred to must be the Claimants and not mine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

several threads merged

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Guys

 

I have had some help from various posters on this thread - but things have just got a lot worse!

 

Can you please go to the attached link and let me know if you can help at all?

 

I'm in Scotland - but any general help also appreciated even if it might just be in English Law.

 

Thanks

 

BD

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?329855-I-m-getting-pursued-personally-for-debts-incurred-by-my-failed-limited-company.&p=3642760&viewfull=1#post3642760

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...