Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

How long to wait after IUC?


SockPuppet
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4741 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there, I'm not new to this forum, but this is an alternative username for a reason.

 

I was convicted of bf (IS and HB) in 2008 for failing to declare a change in circumstances - I was a student in 2004, and because my loan took months to come through I didn't sign off ... I ended up quitting uni after the first year because of a family tragedy and health issues, and even though I no longer claimed my loan, they kept sending it to me for the next 2 years (3 in total), and I just kept my mouth shut and spent the money.

 

the DWP found out and interviewed me under caution for failing to declare etc. So ... 6 months later, after hearing nothing I got a summons for £13000 worth of fraud.

 

In July 2008 I pleaded guilty and got 150 hours community service. In the meantime I had inherited some money - but I was advised by my solicitor at the time to "keep quiet about it" or risk stirring up the hornet's nest even further. Not what I would say was wise advice, but that's what he said.

 

In December 2010 I was investigated again - a spot check had discovered the inheritance and that at the end of 2008 I still had too much money in savings ... so there was an discrepency between the original investigation and this other lump of money.

 

I admitted everything and told them of my mitigating circumstances - I won't go into details, but they included an official diagnosis of a mental health disability, depression, addiction problems, relationship breakdown and bereavement. (all on record).

 

The investigating officer said I should hear about the decision within 6-7 weeks.

 

About a month later I had a letter stating that the amount I owed was £2010 - but heard nothing about their decision - I am no longer on benefits and was fortunately in a position to pay this back in one go. So, I owe them nothing for this latest case, but still owe them for the first case.

 

After 7 weeks I phoned the investigator who told me that they still hadn't made a decision on my case but to expect to hear "very soon".

However, 7 months on and I've heard nothing. Not a word, nothing! So ...

How long do these things usually take? Could I be lost in a pile of paperwork and completely forgotten about? In which case will contacting them act as a reminder and make things worse?

 

Has paying it all back made things better for me?

 

If the worse comes to the worse ... what should I expect for a 2nd offence? Even though it was related to the first offence and my mental health back then. Is it time to think about the worst case scenario?

 

Apparently there is something about justifiable delay, and also something in the Human Rights Act that says cases need to be brought within "reasonable time" ... could this apply here? (hse.gov.uk/enforce/enforcementguide/court/abuse-delay.htm)

 

Anyway, thank you for all considered responses :)

Edited by SockPuppet
Link to post
Share on other sites

I had an IUC on 10 Feb 2011 and received a letter dated 1 April 2011 saying they were taking no further action. So that was 7 weeks. At my IUC, my interviewer said there was about a 2 month backlog of cases that the decision makers were going through.

 

Seven months is certainly a long delay for hearing whether they are taking any further action in your case. The best way to find out what's happening is to contact them, but that's up to you ...

 

I hope it works out all right for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have the solicitor's advice in writing - firstly this would be a mitigating factor - having an idiot as a solicitor who gave stupid advice - secondly you have a case against the solicitor.

Edited by leemack
Link to post
Share on other sites

Apply to the solicitor for a copy of your case file - don't mention anything about what is happening, just make a simple request. Your solicitor may have made notes about your discussion. As has been said he'd be pretty stupid to write it down.....but you never know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well when it comes to it I'll certainly explore every avenue available ... especially as I wasn't in a sane mental state at the time and now back to my old self and thinking clearly.

 

The main issue at the moment is whether to chase it up or leave it and carry on waiting ... I'm not particularly stressed, but it is getting in the way of making a few plans.

 

What's the longest anyone else has needed to wait for an answer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to chase it up. The overpayment notification letters have a habit of not turning up. You have an absolute time of 13 months from date of decision to appeal an overpayment. If you leave it too long to chase, as I've known people to do - even though they did not commit fraud and could have won an appeal, they lost their right of appeal due to the time limit passing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to chase it up. The overpayment notification letters have a habit of not turning up. You have an absolute time of 13 months from date of decision to appeal an overpayment. If you leave it too long to chase, as I've known people to do - even though they did not commit fraud and could have won an appeal, they lost their right of appeal due to the time limit passing.
Oh I heard about the overpayment - it was £2010 and I paid it in full on the same day without appealing it. I requested a signed receipt which I received "without prejudice to any other action they may decide".

 

What I haven't heard is what action they plan to take against me, if any ... I still don't know whether I'm gonna get a caution, a fine or prosecuted - and I don't know if I've been lost in the system or not (which would be a result).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which benefit was it that investigated?
Income Support - granted because I didn't qualify for incapacity benefit.

 

Sorry to butt in, just wanted to ask did you repay the first overpayment of £13000?
I am paying it off on a regular direct debit. Edited by SockPuppet
Link to post
Share on other sites

You may find the local council will eventually contact you - it sometimes takes a while but usually their computers match with DWP that you weren't entitled to income support for the period, sorry to say, but I've seen people get the overpayment notice from the council months or years after the original dWP overpayment. This is why it may be still be worth appealling the income support overpayment if you don't think you're guilty and can make a case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...