Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Welcome to the forum What makes you think that ?   Andy
    • We purchased our Mercedes in September 2023 from Doves in Horsham for £21000, paying half cash and half on finance. We also purchased warranty for life via Ramp as recommended by Doves. On 12th May 2024 the car failed to recognise the key and wouldn’t not open, the AA could not identify the problem so via our warranty the car was taken to Mercedes in Croydon. After 3 weeks the problem was finally identified as water ingress in the drivers side footwell which has corroded and blown various components. After further investigation it was discovered the windscreen was date stamped 2019 (all the windows are 2018 - therefore not the factory fitted windscreen) The leak has developed due to incorrect sealant being used assuming when this was replaced and also water leaking from the seam. The warranty company do not cover water ingress so we are now faced with a bill of £3635. As we are now at 8 months since purchase (problem started at just over 7 months) we are not covered by the consumer rights acts. Would we be covered Sale of Goods Act? We have all the reports for the works being completed but unsure if this should be taken to the finance company or Doves who we purchased the car from. Do we pay for the works and then try and claim it back or should they be paying? Any help would be much appreciated
    • im also wondering if back billing applies here too . from looking at like threads around this SSE to ovo compulsory switch, it must be evidenced by the claimant that bills were regularly issued for the period of the supply the debt they claim covers. there are no threads here that show they could ever produce them, so back billing rules (12mts) might also play a part.
    • Vodafone have reported that they are having issues with their Credit File APIs into the Credit Reference Agencies where aged accounts over 6 years are being readded to Credit Files. In some instances, people are having defaults rescinded and changed to late payment status making the account live again!    --- Have you been affected? Please keep an eye out on your credit file for any  new Vodafone Account appearing where there shouldnt be any reason. If you are a Vodafone Customer - Check that the information is correct. check for Late Payments and Defaults.    Don't forget to consider the financial impacts this could have on you.  ---   If you are struggling - Post below and we can guide you to get the result you need!    Its been reported that Experian and TransUnion seem to be where these appear.  They are able to remove the information relatively quickly and it will reflect on next Credit File Refresh.         
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Intermediate rent tenancy agreement issues not resolved


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4812 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello I was wondering if anyone could give me any advice regarding my issue below I apologise if this is long winded or written in the wrong area/website.

Just a bit of background I live in a intermediate rent property with the proviso that I will purchase this property within 5 yrs. I had to jump through hoops to get on this government scheme for this property such as I had to have a qualifying job, credit check, earn a stpulated minimum wage, have no pets CCJs etc.

The property came with two allocated parking spaces , clearly named in my tenancy agreement, and I was told that a parking enforcement company would be employed so if someone was parked in either space we could call them to issue penalties etc. Now since moving in I’ve found the property is a mix of intermediate rent and social housing, not that I believe there is a difference in social class, but we do pay a completely different price PCM(increased) and we are bound to buy this property.

I’ve been unable to use my car space since moving in as cars are constantly occupying my spaces in fact one car has been parked in my space for over 3 months and has yet to move! I’ve contacted the housing association and they have not resolved the matter and in fact have made it worse by stating the car parking enforcement company were not guaranteed as all tenants had to agree on this matter.

My question is; is my tenancy agreement a arguing point in being able to force the HA to do something in order to use either of my parking spaces, as I thought this was a legal binding document. Also as these parking spaces are what we are paying for am I able to demand a price change due to the fact im not able to use them?

Thank you very much for any information or advice you can forward

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi gemini_1

 

Could you please let us know who your tenancy agreement is with please ie Housing Association or Private landlord so you can get the correct advice.

 

thanks

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

The terms which the landlord agreed to are those set out in the tenancy agreement, so read it to see what it says about parking rights.

 

See a Solicitor for advice as to whether or not the contract terms do actually impose any binding legal obligation on the landlord in regard to parking rights, before taking any action whatsoever.

 

 

 

You must establish that you have a right - typically an exclusive right - to the use of a parking bay, before the question of enforcement will be considered by a court. If the issue is solely one of enforcement, there may be fewer legal problems though.

 

If the contract gives you an unconditional right to park a vehicle, then you can sue the landlord for any breach of contract: you can ask the court for an order for damages/compensation for past breaches; and perhaps for an order of specific performance, if appropriate, to compel the landlord to carry out positive acts that it has agreed in the contract to do, or alternatively for an injunction, if appropriate, to restrain it from doing those things which it has agreed not to do.

 

 

You will need evidence, more than simply your word, that someone is parking in your space/s: photographs are very helpful, and correspondence with the landlord, over a period of not less than a month, demonstrating its refusal to comply with the contract terms; plus keep a written diary of events throughout that period, detailing who parked in your space/s each day - if you have space/s that is/are exclusively yours - including in each instance a note of the registration number of the offending car. Be sure to submit a photocopy of the diary to the landlord before suing.

 

 

Additionally, or alternatively, it is possible - in theory! - to sue for a breach of a representation, whether made verbally or in writing, which was made with the intention of inducing you to enter into the contract. But it can be very difficult to satisfy a court that any such representation was made, if it was made verbally. And only a Solicitor could advise you as to the proper procedure, and prospects for success on that ground - if any.

Edited by Ed999
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi gemini_1

 

Fully agree with Ed999 advice you must be certain you have exclusive us of said parking spaces.

 

Also please check their website under existing tenants and go to complaints and have a read if you think this pertails to you follow their procedure

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...