Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Payday Express - Requirement to provide Statements **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4788 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I am having an arguement with Payday Express, over an outstanding balance, I consider the figure to be lower than the amount they claim is still outstanding on the account. I requested a statement showing all sums paid, interest added and balance over time figures, which I felt they should be obliged to provide under the CCA, they fell that they have no obligations in this regard and any references I find seem to relate to annual statements which obviously a short term loan would not fall into. They have offered to provide all details for £1 clearly a CCA request, but does anyone have any knowledge of this, do they have an obligation to provide a statement of account on request?

 

If they don't have to provide a statement, then its easy to see why people can get into financial difficulties with these parasites.

 

I suppose what I would like to do here is put the account inot dispute until they provide the statement, but need to be sure of my grounds.

 

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Robjam, but these monkeys have a habit of just taking what they want from an account anyway, I just need to know if they are obliged to provide a statement without resorting to a CCA request, because if they are then their refusal to do so means that I can put the account into formal dispute and if they are stupid enough to try and take money whilst in dispute then the FOS will drop on them, if I CCA it then they can still remove money whilst they are complying, and I am pretty sure they won't provide all the details I need anyway.

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, these people are tossers.

I paid my final payment of £240 on tuesday, to recieve a text and email on wednesday saying i was o/standing. I advised check your systems. but they then still urged i hadnt paid.

I transferred £40 to buy tickets into my debit acc, to find they had thieved it.

So i rang up, and explained they were a bunch of thieves nd i wanted my money back. Again i was told they didnt have my money.... me being me, i squealed down the phone gimme my money back you bunch of fu@king theiveing Bartards....and hung up.

Immediately rang back and now a manager came on the phone again saying they didnt have the money. So i emailled her the screen shot of the payment going on the 15th and the payment details, surrise surprise they did recieve it.... they sent my money back within the hour but didnt even have the decency to apoligise, so i never apoligsed back.

 

Goood Riddence express.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats what concerns me that they take more than they should, I want clear them off this month, and by my calculations I can afford to do it, but they have come back with I owe them £60 more than I calculate, without statements I cannot prove it, they have you by the short and curlies; hence my thoughts about them needing to provide statements...but do they or don't they?

Link to post
Share on other sites

For any company to chase you for a debt, they have to prove if asked to show the money is owed. I would Sar them, and ask for all data on you, along with credit agreements, once you send this they have to put your account, though knowing this company they wont.

 

Make sure you have no money in your debit account as they will steal.

 

I paid £200 last month but they tried to charge me a late fee, as i never paid full balance. They said i never requested a deferral. They asked me to pay additional to cover the defferal even tho the £200 more than covered this. They adv of a charge to which i told them.....

 

Charge me if you want... im not paying.... take me to court if you want, and then you can tell the judge how £200 doesnt cover a £40 deferral fee.......

 

I notice they backed down on this.

 

Time to get scumbags by the short and curlies.

 

How some of these people sleep at night..... must not have a conscience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...