Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Has anyone that you have known or posted on this forum received knocks on doors from them or received a ccj and been sent to court or have sent bailiffs or gave the debt to another company. if they don’t have any legal powers why do they threaten with court action 
    • Ok, so just been to see my friend, she still has her head firmly in the sand and had a pile of unopened post, thankfully nothing serious apart from this case!    In answer to your question it says N24 General Directions Order at the bottom of the page, then on page 2 where the line says "As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) " this is N271 Notice of transfer of proceedings.  Within the stack of letters I found 2 from Kearns Solicitors,    02-12-2022 Document pack with covering letter stating under the s78 CCA please see enclosed  1) A copy of the executed Credit Agreement, 2)  A copy of the terms & conditions 3) A copy of the varied terms & conditions applicable at termination / assignment, and  4) A statement regarding the conduct of your account as requested by s78(1)(a) to (c)  (Would you like me to describe the documents attached?)   18-02-2023 Generic letter asking for her to contact them to discuss settlement or they will take to court for further legal action. 
    • well you made the cardinal sin by phoning these scammers at least once so their persistence could go on. however you are new so there you go. you never ever ever phone any of these likes of scammers on these fake schemes that seem plausible.  just like a DCA chasing any old debt .. they are NOT BAILIFFS and have  ZERO legal powers to actually do anything. dx  
    • Okay understood now just based on personal experience how long does this go on for 
    • civil recovery schemes run by the likes of RLP DWF etc etc are a scam. totally IGNORE EVERYTHING. no if's or but's dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Need help please, Claim filed via Moneyclaim, offer from halifax for less!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6446 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

My friend filed her claim via moneyclaim.gov a week or so ago and she has just had a letter saying they will repay £1300 instead of £1700, after they sent a letter saying they were going to defend all of the claim, the amount on the claim is £1700, so should'nt they be paying this amount?

Anyone else had the same letter?

What should she do now? Inform the court?

She does'nt want to accept the £1300 she wants the full £1700

Please get me back to me asap??? :(

 

Received my letter from the courts yesterday, a notice of issue, says claim issued 25th Aug, court sent it to defendant 07 sept, and it will be deemed to be served on the 10th sept, the defendant has until 25th sept to reply.

 

Will I be waiting until 25th sept? Has anyone had to wait so long?

 

Many thanks in advance

 

Nikki

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

My friend filed her claim via moneyclaim.gov a week or so ago and she has just had a letter saying they will repay £1300 instead of £1700, after they sent a letter saying they were going to defend all of the claim, the amount on the claim is £1700, so should'nt they be paying this amount?

Anyone else had the same letter?

What should she do now? Inform the court?

She does'nt want to accept the £1300 she wants the full £1700

Please get me back to me asap??? :(

 

Received my letter from the courts yesterday, a notice of issue, says claim issued 25th Aug, court sent it to defendant 07 sept, and it will be deemed to be served on the 10th sept, the defendant has until 25th sept to reply.

 

Will I be waiting until 25th sept? Has anyone had to wait so long?

 

Many thanks in advance

 

Nikki

 

hi, dont panic tell them you accept the offer as a partial settlement however you will continue to seek the balance through the court. This is a standard fob off i would expect a full settlement soon.:D Have the acknowledged the claim on MCOL?

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou very much livelylad, have told her to phone them as its faster, yeah her claim was acknowledged some time ago.

Hope mine hurries up, all this waiting is driving me :-x

 

Thanks again

Nikki

 

hi, dont panic tell them you accept the offer as a partial settlement however you will continue to seek the balance through the court. This is a standard fob off i would expect a full settlement soon.:D Have the acknowledged the claim on MCOL?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou very much livelylad, have told her to phone them as its faster, yeah her claim was acknowledged some time ago.

Hope mine hurries up, all this waiting is driving me :-x

 

Thanks again

Nikki

you are welcome. dont forget click my scales:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...