Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Apcoa parking double charge, not replying to correspondence


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4757 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, this is a small but irksome niggle I've been trying to sort since October last year. I parked at Paddington Train Station in an APCOA managed car park. When I tried to buy a ticket at the pay and display machine, it took forever then said "Transaction Timed Out". I spoke to a very reluctant attendant who said I must try a different machine and assured me I had not been charged as the machine didn't issue a ticket.

 

So I walked to the other end of the car park, bought a ticket successfully and went belatedly on my way. Sure enough when I checked my bank statement there were two charges.

 

I've been emailing them and calling them to no avail. Initially they did enter a dialogue, asked me to send proof (which I did) and then they asked for my address and said a payment was being issued. I have not received it and now my emails and answerphone messages are being blithely ignored. It's not a vast sum of money but given the time and hassle I am determined not to let them off the hook.

 

Any suggestions warmly received! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

(emailed via contact us link on network rail website, 24/2/2011)

 

 

Hi there,

 

I have an outstanding complaint in regard to APCOA parking services arising from an overcharge back in October 2010 at Paddington Station. I have communicated directly with them but not reached an outcome. I have been advised to contact your company as the owner or lessee of the car park is responsible for the actions of their agents

 

I have emails which detail the matter completely and would be happy to forward them for your attention. I would be very grateful if you could attend to this promptly as it has taken over 4 months so far.

 

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

RESULT!! Waiting beside the letterbox now....:)

 

 

Dear Ms ****

 

First of all we would like to sincerely apologise for the inconvenience caused which resulted in your card being changed twice for your parking session in the London Paddington Station Car Park. Secondly, we would like to offer our sincere apologies for the delay in getting your refund for £10.00 actioned. We can confirm that your refund request, along with sufficient proof and postal address, was received on 4th November 2010 and forwarded to the refunds department for the Network Rail contract, based in Manchester, on the same day. We have explained the circumstances to the refunds department and that you are still waiting for your refund and will instigate an investigation to find out why this has taken so long. They have now confirmed that the refund request has been accepted and the relevant details surrounding the refund have been sent to our finance department so that a cheque can be generated and sent to your postal address in ********.

 

Once again, please accept our apologies for the time that it has taken for you to receive your refund for your double charge at the London Paddington Station Car Park.

 

Best regards

 

APCOA Parking Customer Service team

UK Head Office

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Just wanted to let you all know the refind cheque finally turned up last week - a staggering 6 months after the initial double charge.

The lesson? Don't park at the Apcoa car-park at Paddington unless you have the right change! Thanks again to all of you that helped me bring this to a conclusion, without your generous advice I might have given up. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...