Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • now do you want help or just come here to rant at the 1st chance. is this indictive of why you have this issue with BG? there isn't one really just you being pedantic? now give us a chance to decide lets have some info. we don't accept .jpg picture files as they are displayed directly to screen whereby anyone members or not can see them, hence we require a multipage pdf properly redacted. theres a good upload guide to read on that. so ball is your court... we still would help our worst enemy regardless . dx
    • doh sorry was on phone screen. i think thats all ok,  let @AndyOrch confirm 1st please. dx  
    • Same date as poc then i dont like the agreement either, it just smells to me, but i can't find a like one of that era to compare against. this is only 10yrs old, so weight that up, i'd say enforceable & most are from the ear as a whole here. it cant be a recon as they must state so, and it wouldn't/doesn't need to have a tickbox+typed name to be so either. >80% loss if you go fwd, unless you can pay the CCJ within 30 days of judgement in FULL, might be time to consider a tomlin/consent, as much as i hate link, if you don't want to gamble on a very small chance of a win or can't pay within 30 days if you lose. what date is the hearing? dx    
    • Hi T911 and welcome to CAG. As you say, an interesting screw up. So much for quality control! Anyway, our regular advice is to ignore all of their increasingly threatening missives... UNLESS you get a letter of claim, then come back here and we'll help you write a "snotty letter" to help them decide whether to take it any further with their stoopid pics. If you get mail you're unsure of, just upload it for the team to have a look.
    • Thanks @lolerzthat's an extremely helpful post. There is no mention of a permit scheme in the lease and likewise, no variation was made to bring this system in. I recall seeing something like a quiet enjoyment clause, but will need to re-read it and confirm. VERY interesting point on the 1987 Act. There hasn't been an AGM in years and I've tried to get one to start to no avail. However, I'll aim to find out more about how the PPC was brought in and revert. Can I test with you and others on the logic of not parking for a few months? I'm ready to fight OPS, so if they go nuclear on me then surely it doesn't matter? I assume that I will keep getting PCNs as long as I live here, so it doesn't make sense for me to change the way that I park?  Unless... You are suggesting that having 5 or so outstanding PCNs, will negatively affect any court case e.g. through bad optics? Or are we trying to force their hand to go to court with only 2 outstanding PCNs?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Late Mothers Debt - Executor's liability towards unsecured debt (most in default or DCA)


twistyp
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4824 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My mother passed away recently. She made me the sole executor of her will. Her estate is (barely) large enough to require grant of representation (Scotland). She has a number of unsecured creditors (bank loan, bank overdraft, credit cards). She had not worked for 5 years prior to her death, and was recieving various benefits. Around a year ago she contacted Consumer Credit Councilling Services who assisted her in writing to her creditors. Most creditors had applied defaults and were accepting goodwill payments towards the accounts. Two of her creditors had sold the debt to Debt Collection Agencies.

 

I have listed as much relevant facts above as possible. Have I missed anything?

 

I understand I need to publicly advertise to invite creditors to make a claim against the estate. I shall do this in the national press.

 

What I need to find out the extent of my responsibilities with regards to:

 

- Notifying of the death

- Advising on the value of the estate

- Making offer of settlement (or otherwise)

 

Seeing some of the action taken against unsecured lenders on this site - particularly the CCA then SAR angle, does anyone have any experience of this under the circumstances (deceased estate)?

 

Obviously given the scenario here, I am loathe to allow unsecured creditors to take what my mother intended as our inheritance if you like (life insurance policy). However as stated, it leaves little change if every creditor must be settled. Hence I'm sure you can understand I'd want to establish the boundaries I'm working within!

 

Any help is massively appreciated, and the gesture would be returned if possible.

 

Grant

 

Any other advise appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

An executor is not personally liable for the deceased debts unless they execute the estate incorrectly. You are legally entitled to challenge all creditors to prove that a debt legally exists, that it is enforceable and that they have the right to collect. This could take a year or more and you would be perfectly within your rights to withold any payments for a year or more until the estate is finalized.

 

The main thing is to determine which of these debts are enforceable, those that are not can be ignored. Those that are need to be paid from the estate after priority debts are paid, these include cost of the funeral, taxes, mortgage (if any) and your costs incurred administering the estate etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanls for the replies so far. My intention is to value the estate in it's entirety and have the solicitor apply for grant of representation. I will then write to each of her supposed creditors asking for any alleged liabilities to be disclosed, which I can then challenge hopefully. I need to ensure I have the legal power to make CCA requests and SAR as the executor, and not the original debtor? The solicitor asked for a break-down or at least a rough estimate of any debt owed. I felt putting that down would make it easier for creditors to stake a claim further down the line. Any Court Grants I understand will be held publicly available, so once it is granted the value of the estate is visible, and with an accompanying acknowledgement of the debt, not a good combination I'd imagine. Despite it feeling morally wrong not to disclose the debt to the lawyer ergo it doesn't appear on anything disclosed to the courts, is this illegal as such?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A couple of links that may be helpful.;

 

http://bfime.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/203/~/wills,-probate-%26-inheritance---some-information-for-residents-of-scotland

 

http://www.assistedprobateservices.com/dealingwithprobate.html

 

Any Court Grants I understand will be held publicly available,
Yes and any Will too.

 

Remember as an Executor if you fail to disclose information you would be held personally liable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the above links, much appreciated.

 

I'ts a fine line with the adminstration it seems. If I write to the creditors asking for confirmation of any liabilities, once I have collected this in, I should put an ad in the paper and apply for a Bond of Caution? (Scotland).

 

Obviously I want to tick the boxes, but do the minimum, I do not want to make it easy for creditors to place a claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you write to the creditors ask them to provide proof of the debts + copies of statements.

I should put an ad in the paper and apply for a Bond of Caution? (Scotland).

Yes, then if any creditors turn up at a later date there is no comback against you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...