Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Tesco Mastercard CCA


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3024 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Two choices really:

 

You tell Robinson Way, as part of a formal complaint, to stop banging on about a CCA request and deal with the issue at hand; what they've got under CPUTR. Or you can just ignore it. You're certainly under no obligation to give anyone a ref. no. for the FOS.... and what you do or do not do isn't any of their d*mn business.

 

CPUTR regs. are always ignored (so to speak). That alone tells you they have nothing.

 

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Thanks yet again priority one.I have sent a letter (by recorded delivery of course) telling them that as tesco have ignored my request under CPUTR (2008) that they obviously dont hold an original copy of the credit agreement and account remains unenforcable. Also told them its none of their business if I have complained about their client to the FSA

Edited by solentshipwreck
Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in the same position with Tesco, although I have been paying them £1 a month for a little while now. They have ignored a couple of CPUTR requests, never sent a copy agreement under my CCA request, and I feel that I am just extending the 6 years statute period from starting by continuing to pay this monthly payment. I'll send them a recorded delivery letter also this time and see if I get any response, but I feel that PriorityOne is right in saying that if they ignore a CPUTR then the chances are that they do not have enforcable paperwork.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tesco tend to be very tenacious...... and unlikely to give you a definitive answer under CPUTR or anything else. Mine is still being dragged out and is on it's 4th DCA now..... but two of those DCAs have dropped Tesco right in it by saying there are no docs. available!

 

:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Have had a reply from Robinson Way telling me as far as they are concerned I have been given enough evidence by Tesco to prove that I am liable for the debt. All that they are doing is repeating themselves (still totally ignoring my request under CPUTR 2008) I am therefore required to pay within 14 days and they may take further action if i do not pay. This will be noted on my credit file and will effect me getting credit in the future. I guess i just ignore them until they take further action?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well.... as far as YOU are concerned, you are still waiting for a definitive answer to your question.... You could make this a 2nd formal complaint actually; seeing as they haven't yet addressed the first one.

 

Or..... you could ignore for the time being.

 

I'm starting to wonder if these DCAs are following a script drawn up by Tesco actually because it all sounds very, very familiar, yet you have had different DCAs to me. I have never had the pleasure of dealing with Robinson Way.

 

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

well after a long period i have heard from tesco again. Seems they have short memories as guess what..... no further answers to my questions. and they have deicded to assign my account. And guess who is going to deal with the account. It did make me smile.... Robinson Way. I have been advised in the same letter of assignment to expect correspondence from them. I wonder what their memories are like. lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have now received a letter from Robinson Way, informing me that my details have been passed to them for collection to help me clear the outstanding balance. They also state that money is owed to HPH2 LTD and enclosed a letter from Hoist Portfolio Holding 2 Limited statino that tesco personal finance has assigned all of its respective rights, title and interest to them. The total balance was sold as of 20/01/16 . Also states that Robinson Way has been appointed to manage the account and to collect the outstanding amount. I see HPH2 Ltd are based in Jersey

 

Hope that answers the previous question

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldnt bother wasting the ink personally as there is still an outstanding request from last time, surely this must be approaching SB status soon

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...