Jump to content


Pyyp23 vs Marbles/HFC/Robinson way


Pyyp23
 Share

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3821 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've started a new thread as i couldn't find my old one on here about this.

 

So a quick recap:

 

November 2009 Sent CCA Request recorded delivery.

Marbles issue faulty default letter

March 2010 Sent CCA reminder

Marbles issue termination letter

March 2010 Sent Accept unlawful recission letter

Marbles send a letter acknowledging they cannot find an agreement and will cease chasing payments until they have found it.

 

So I stopped paying anything to them and thought it had gone away.

 

Suddenly received a letter this morning from robinson way headed Formal demand for payment and includes a line saying it is a formal notice of intended court action.

 

In all honesty it looks like a standard template letter with lots of "may's" and "could's".

 

Should i send them the account in dispute letter, bemused letter or ignore it?

 

Regards,

Pyyp23

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Account was sold to capquest before i got a response from robinson way. I sent an account in dispute letter to them and got a reply asking me to provide supporting evidence of the dispute.

 

Should I send anything back? or do you think they are trying to find out how i will try and defend myself if they try and take me to court?

 

regards,

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should mention that the account was unlawfully rescinded. which i have retained proof of.

I also have a letter from Marbles stating that they will not pursue the debt.

 

I hae also noticed in some of the threads that Section 78 can no longer be used as a defence. I haven't found out why.

Can anyone enlightn me.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them a copy of the letter where HFC said they would not chase.

Anthrax alert at debt collectors caused by box of doughnuts

 

Make sure you do not post anything which identifies you. Although we can remove certain things from the site unless it's done in a timely manner everything you post will appear in Google cache & we do not have any control over that.

 

Vir prudens non contra ventum mingit

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

17 Port & Maritime Regiment RCT

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should i also send them proof of unlawful recission?
Not yet, see how they respond.

Anthrax alert at debt collectors caused by box of doughnuts

 

Make sure you do not post anything which identifies you. Although we can remove certain things from the site unless it's done in a timely manner everything you post will appear in Google cache & we do not have any control over that.

 

Vir prudens non contra ventum mingit

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

17 Port & Maritime Regiment RCT

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...