Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Reform more or less said it's what they will be campaigning about but they don't expect to be implementing the plans. Dan Neidle thinks the cost is about double the amount of Truss's plans and the IFS think the figures are out by £10s of billions.
    • Rather like farage .. Reform UK plans ‘don’t add up’ and costings are out ‘by tens of billions of pounds per year’, says IFS – UK general election live | General election 2024 | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM As Nigel Farage launches party’s manifesto, Institute for Fiscal Studies says ‘the package as a whole is problematic’   "Reform UK has published its manifesto. They plan tax cuts which they say will cost £70bn; however our analysis shows that they’ve miscalculated, and the actual cost will be at least £93bn. Reform UK says it will fund these tax costs with £70bn of savings and additional revenue, but it provides few details. Their proposal to change Bank of England reserve rules is over-stated by at least £15bn, and the cost would likely fall on businesses and consumers, not banks. These two factors mean that Reform UK’s plans have a total unfunded cost of at least £38bn – about twice the unfunded cost of Liz Truss’ ill-fated 2022 “mini-budget”.
    • The finance company has a 50% stake (legal Owner) in the deal so I would certainly involve them. As for the outstanding £3635 bill thats owing to Mercedes in Croydon I wouldn't be in a rush to settle that just yet and keep it in abeyance as leverage.  Where are you at with Doves in Horsham ?
    • or go really bold ... Further to my request for a copy of the agreement you refer to on ( date) I made a section 78 request pursuant to the Credit Consumer Act 1974 to which you have yet to reply or respond. Pursuant to the Credit Consumer act 1974 section 78 (6) If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)— (a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.
    • Pers I'd stop paying the lot and get each defaulted by a dn issuance.  Defaults can't hurt future renting no Only ccj's Can't keep saying the same answers.    Dx        
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Huge Interest Payments VERY catalogue!! HELP


Flombay
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4962 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Huge Interest Payments VERY catalogue!! HELP

Hiya all I hope someone can offer me some advise,

I have a 'Very' catalogue that ive had for years, Ive always paid and was aware of their
interest
rates being high however they have changed their buy now pay later to something called Take 3 and the buy now pay later option leaves you payment free for a year and after that time the interest & goods value is added to your account, last year I thought ok fine no probs TILL NOW

In 3 months ive gone from having a managable ballance of £600+ with interest of £16+ to having a ballance of £2000+ and interest ranging between £200+ with apr last month being 39.7% to this month interest was £145, apr on this statement 19.9%

I asked on the phone WHY the interest changed so much and was told it was variable!!??

My minimum payments on this account are £88 & should my interest remain at £145 per month im going to have my ballance go up every month by £56 unless I can pay £223 just to cover interest & minimum payment, I cant possibly afford that

My husband is in employment but in a Debt payment plan & Im not working as we have 2 small children

To make matters worse Ive another £314 & £279 'maturing' in october & November, To opt out of god only knows how much interest on top of what I already have added to my account each month ive to pay £314 before the 16th of this month,

I cant do this I dont have the money & in addition to that would have to also pay £223, this months interest & minimum payment

I hope this is making sense, My interest could double in the next few months because of my buy now pay laters maturing so I would effectively owe them money forever and that amount would increase as would my minimum payment??

What am I to do??

Ive never had credit where the minimum payment does not include your interest, even if my interest remained at £145 for a year (which it wont) paying the minimum payment my ballance would increase by around £800....When I rang to confirm the interest I saw on my statement I said to the woman 'so if I only pay the minimum payment my ballance will go up every month and she just said well yes'

 

I hope this makes sense, Im at a loss as to what to do, am feeling very stupid at not reading the 'Terms & Conditions' but having used this catalogue for many many years without bother I just didnt think it mattered, Stupidly thought they were just Jazzing up their buy now pay later, More fool me,

Im in Scotland by the way and would really appreciate any advise

Thanks In advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Flombay,

 

This is a bit old but you may still be stuck.

 

Take 3 and BNPL are two different things;

 

Take 3 - If you pay 1/3 of your balance, you do not pay interest on the remaining debt.

 

BNPL - Delays the first payment for, say 12 months if it's 12 months BNPL. But you then get backdated interest charged if you don't pay the item off before the BNPL charge date.

 

I would guess the reason for your very variable interest charge is that you are getting BNPL items maturing.

 

For example I owe £1000, my take 3 payment is £330, if I pay that there is no interest. If I pay the minimum, and my APR is 29.9, then miniumum payment is £50 and interest charge would be £20-odd quid (say £23).

 

The big interest you are seeing is the maturing BNPL.

 

So in the example above I add a £1000 plasma TV which matured last month they are going to add interest to my account this month ~ £300 so my balance is now £2.3k and the interest is £300 + ~£23 = £323 my minimum payment is £115.

 

The month after, the interest would back down to ~£47.

 

If you have enough for this month's payment and it's larger than one of the maturing items then make a targeted payment for that item, by ringing and paying, saying that you want to make a targeted payment.

 

Cheers

 

Fish

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...