Jump to content


The Times has new article on FOS problems


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4921 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Main points from the article

  • Consumers getting compensation of less than expected
  • Critics want a separate body to impose sanctions and enforce payments
  • 1st example case of Mr O'Brien and father with dementia, who calculates redress should be £344,000, was offered £28,400 by the firm. FOS Ombudsman accepts the lower figure
  • FOS makes no check on firm's calculations usually
  • Adrian Sanders, MP now involved
  • 2nd example case is my own. Accepted Ombudsmans decision but then learned Ombudsman had not followed FOS guidelines which would have raised offer by £8000.
    Full details at ww.fos-problems.co.uk (change ww to www to get the proper address, I am unable to post links yet)
  • FOS makes few referrals to FSA (20 in 5 years !)
  • Comments on Adjudicators low experience, salary and training compared with the firms' experts
  • Quotes from Jane Sanders the FOS whistleblower about adjudicators

Its a long article, the lead article in the Personal Finance section. Calm and accurate with telling points well made by Mark Atherton, the journalist.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...