Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Interesting question regarding what Government accounts opposition parties have access to, before an General Election. From what I understand, Government department accounts that are published are always lagging behind and would not include some amounts which are classified as 'commercially sensitive'.  Therefore opposition parties and Parliamentrary select committees would not have access to accounts which contain real time up to date information. If a new Government have found £20 billion of spending liabilities they did not know about, this could be true, as £20 billion is not that much when you look at total Government expenditure. Government department are making decisions on spending all of the time and it could be the previous Government were planning tax changes and/or spending cuts to balance the books.  Jeremy Hunt has recently said that if the Tories had stayed in Government and held an Autumn budget, it would have been very difficult to cut taxes as some had wanted.
    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cancelling T Mobile


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5065 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My brother had a contract for two years with T Mobile for a broadband dongle for internet.

He paid it every month but after two years and three months he wrote to them saying he wanted to cancel the contract as he was going abroad to the Philippines.

He's 70 and likes to do things the old fashioned way and as he only has a mobile for voicecalls he doesn't phone much especially as some nos from a mobile are expensive to call.

 

He asked me if T Mobile had written back to confirm the cancellation and I said I'd checked his mail and no.

 

He's in the Philippines now.

 

I went into the T Mobile shop in town and gave them his details and they said the account is active and can't be cancelled in writing he has to phone up T Mobile to cancel.

 

My brother has emailed me to say it's quite difficult for him to ring them from the Philippines and can be expensive. A letter has now arrived telling my brother he's £14.99 in arrears. He cancelled his DD to T Mobile before he left.

 

So what now ???????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Eleanor,

 

I think written notice is sufficent to cancel a contract. The only reason I can think of why they might want him to ring, is to try an retain his custom, they've probably got a large customer service team. If you can get hold of the letter your brother sent, I would send it with the arrears letter, recorded. In fact address it to the Richard Moat, Managing Director of T-Mobile. I would advise going through

Customer Service, but I can envisage this continuing for months.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that.

 

Well I'm surprised that a signed letter saying you wish to cancel the service is insufficient according to T Mobile.

 

And a stamp can also be cheaper than calling from a mobile and waiting in line to speak to an advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You mean he sent a letter of termination, yet didn't follow through to ensure his instruction were carried out? I have to say, these days it Is folly to assume a letter will have been acted upon in much the same way as a phone call. Unless sent by RD, they can retain the upper hand and deny the notice was ever received.

 

He needs to email Tmobile, confirming his initial communication with dates, adding that whilst they ard investigating the issue of the original cancellation date, they take his follow up emai

As a further confirmation of termination and to cancel immediately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He followed thru in the respect that after he sent the letter and once he was abroad he asked me to go into the T Mobile shop and check that the contract was cancelled. They said it wasn't and he needed to phone them as a letter wasn't enough.

It's unfortunately if in this country a letter of instruction has to be followed up by phone calls and emails just to make sure that the instructions on his letter are carried out.

Surely the companies should be able to follow the customers wishes after he writes them a letter ?

 

I'm sure that after he wrote the letter it was a couple of weeks at least before he went abroad so surely they had time to write back and say fine the contract is now cancelled thank you for using T Mobile for the last two years.

 

They must have got his letter if they have contacted him to say the letter isn't enough.

 

What do they do read the letter and then chuck it in the bin ?

 

I remember a time when you could write one letter to a company to cancel and they would cancel.....why have companies become so inefficient ?

 

My brother wrote a letter and thought they would follow his instructions.

 

 

If he was wrong in not emailing and phoning as well then I think our methods of doing business need to change.

Edited by EleanorRigby
Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing to do with 'in this country', if he hadn't committed himself to a legally-binding contract, but as he did - tyhere is too much at stake to leave to chance. The letter may not have arrived, or due to sending it to the wrong address, it got lost in the transfer process. If it was sent to the correct department, at the correct location, they would have acknowledged it, and no doubt followed up with unbeatable deals in a vain effort to keep his business. As you noted, this would probably habe been the result, however a scenario alternative is the letter arrived, got lost due to incompertence and was not acted upon. There is nothing magical or extraordinary about that.

 

You also say he had TWO items, a Phone and a BB dongle. Also that they said a 'letter wasn't enough'. It might not be if it did not contain the required elements to identify the user and legitimse the request, however, this isn;t mentioned anywhere in your initial message, so you might like to expand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I never said he had two items, he only had a T Mobile dongle for broadband.

 

His mobile phone is PAYG and not with T Mobile.

 

The letter arrived and obviously got to the right dept as they say they contacted him,not sure which method they used, to say writing a letter wasn't enough. Well this is what the T Mobile shop said.

 

 

 

Anyway thanks everyone for your help and advice and I will pass it on to him.

Edited by EleanorRigby
Link to post
Share on other sites

Shop staff are usually a bad move as they are invariably 'Retail' or 'Sales' and have no input to existing or back-office systems affecting customers. Providing they have acknowledged his letter to terminate, it is not up to them to disregard it, unless there is an issue over authenticity. Keep us posted as to how it pans out!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...