Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Unbelievable result.. There's hope for us all yet!! :)))


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5039 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I've been keeping my eye on these forums for some time after getting myself into a very sticky situation with a certain very well known building society a few years ago.

 

After 2 years of unbeleiveable financial stress and what appeared to be an impossible situation without BR.. I have today managed to reach an agreement on a full and final settlement that I never dreamed of :)

 

I do not have it in writing as yet, so do not want to reveal too much until it arrives in black and white. But as soon as I have it in writing I will reveal all.

 

However, they have suggested that they want to put it in writing to me, rather than me send them a full and final settlement letter.

 

Are there any specific areas of concern within the wording that I should look out for?

Any advise on this would be hugely appreciated.. and as soon as I have the offer in writing I will tell you my story.. which I hope will be able to help any of you that have had your life put on hold due to reposessions and impossible debts :))

 

Best regards

 

LuckyBoy :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

post the offer letter on the forum with personal details blacked out .....

 

it's no uncommon for creditor to offer big discounts i've had an offer of 10% of the outstanding blance, but they had no CAA do they got 0% of the balance, so ask your self why the big discount, but that said perhas theyd rather have 20% now rather then 2 quid a week for the next 100 years?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are not going to make a full & final offer because whilst they can make an offer now they could change their minds later. Suggest if you want to accept their offer you make it clear its to be full & final & that for the avoidance of doubt no further claims can be made in relation to this matter. Also it wouldn't be a bad idea to refer to the 'consideration' as being an early settlement, in their favour, of the disputed debt

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the input so far guys.

 

Having thought this through I'm a bit nervous about revealing specifics until it's settled. But once done I will happily reveal all. The general summary is that I was forced to hand back a property in 2008.. which was then sold on at approx 45% less than it was valued 12 months prior. That coupled with interest and charges left me with a SIX figure sum owing to a certain big name.

 

This has been going on since then and I have been paying a nominal monthly amount until recently when I lost my job. After several phone calls last Monday and escalating up the chain of command.. we have now reached a settlement figure that I never dreamed of.

 

I will not go into any further specifics as yet, I hope you understand my nervousness to keep it under wraps for now.

 

However, the confirmation letter reads as follows:

 

Dear Mr xxxxxxx

 

Further to our telephone conversation on , I can confirm, as requested, the payment options for you.

 

We are prepared to accept a final settlement of xxxxxxx against your current outstanding debt of xxxxxxxxxx, payable by one of the options as set out below: -

 

Payment Option 1 (lump sum and 12 month payment)

Payment Option 2 (lump sum and 22 month payment)

Payment Option 3 (lump sum and 32 month payment)

 

I can confirm that once the sum of xxxxxxxx has been paid, we will consider your liability as settled and will no longer pursue you for any remaining balance. We will notify the relevant credit reference agencies that your debt has been partially settled.

 

This offer is proposed on the understanding that should you fail to fully comply with amount and/or date of installments the offer will be withdrawn and we will reserve the right to pursue you for the full amount outstanding.

 

Please contact me to when you are in position to confirm which payment you would realistically be able to maintain, and also confirm when your first payment can be made.

 

I trust this is satisfactory to your requirements.

 

Many thanks

 

xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx

 

it looks pretty good to me, although I may need to ask for a caveat on the payment plan in case a payment one day late gives them the power to withdrawer the offer.. but, other than that it seems to say what it needs to.

 

Does anyone have any thoughts or concerns about how this is written?

Any further guidance would be hugely appreciated.

 

Many thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...