Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Parking Tickets in Town Car Parks


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5049 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi guys,

i'm trying to read up on the actual laws about Parking Tickets issued when you park in a town centre multi-storey or something similar.

 

 

My daughter was given a ticket whilst parked in a car park at the back of stockport shopping centre, which I think is council land.

 

 

During the run up to Christmas last year the Council try and sucker us into shopping in Stockport and offer 'FREE' parking days to compete with the local shopping malls like the Trafford Centre which has free parking 24/7 .

 

 

. . on the day my daughter got the ticket it was meant to be a 'free' parking day

but apparently this information was a printing error in the local newspaper!!

 

 

she paid and that was the end of that .

. . however after reading various stories on here i wanted to know if it happens again etc or she/we received a ticket for being wrongfully parked or expiry of the ticket what is our legal position?

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh yes i understand that and my daughter paid the 'fine' begrudgingly .

. . what i'm wanting to find out is if you get a Parking Ticket for either not parking correctly or your ticket had expired etc

do you need to pay the fine . .

. because it's a Council owned car park . .

. whereas if it's a private car park, say Sainsburys or something like that and you get a Parking Ticket for a slighly expired ticket do you have to pay?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you have to pay council tickets because they are backed by the appropriate legislation.

 

 

This is in contrast to private car parks which rely on civil law.

 

 

This states that only the actual material loss can be claimed by the land-owner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to pay or appeal a council PCN.

 

 

It is worth bearing in mind that a Traffic Order is needed for the council to carry out parking enforcement at a given location.

 

 

This is a legal document which specifies what the parking regs are at that location.

 

 

It is sometimes the case that off-street parking (ie car parks) is not backed up by a Traffic Order but of course it should be, so before you pay I would suggest requesting a copy from the council.

 

 

They may have one, and it may be in order, in which case nothing gained - but they may not - in which case you can successfully challenge it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...