Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HFO chasing 3 CITI Loans + **WON PPI**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3733 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The applications go to the original creditor - for Citi, the form is on the Citi web site. Makes no difference if it was 'sold on' - Citi misold the PPI

Edited by coledog

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 309
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok that's good to know. A further weight off the mind anyway. Had a letter saying it had been assigned to Buchanan n Wells. Can't remember tbh if I kept it.

 

Re ppi, feels strange as been saying for 3 years ( I feel) to prove it . And now I am saying cough up the ppi I paid. I don't leave myself open do I?

 

If not how would I start processing and even working out how much is owed? I have the last loan but it is an "extension" so know there's more added. Also finally can they still just take what is refunded off their supposed final balance?

 

Assigned to BCW, that's interesting, could you post that letter up please.

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get the reclaim form from Citi's web site and fill it it in quoting the original account numbers, Have a look at Dx's links. You do not need to work it out, just think about when you took out the loans and your situation at the time and ask for any PPI to be refunded. How did they sell it to you? Was PPI added? You obviously had problems but did not claim on the PPI. The debt has been paid off as it was 'sold on' so claim PPI from the original lender

 

Tell BCW to go and do one as this is SB!

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Assigned to BCW, that's interesting, could you post that letter up please.

 

I ll see if I kept it or "filed" it. You remember well CD it was a loan on top of a loan. Will start looking into that tomorrow. Does the SBd amount offset the ppi claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry!! Me again. Been busy. Can I run something past people? Just to check my thinking out as I may be well off bat.

 

Last loan 22:07/05, ppi amount 1855, 2848 days ago at .002 interest per day is 10566.08 interest. Is that right??? I'm sure the maths is correct but is my logic behind it sound?

Link to post
Share on other sites

attach the spread [go advanced/manage attachments]

 

 

if you had rollover see no.1. below

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to use this and enter EVERY PPI payment and calc the rollover

This first spreadsheet is the latest version of the statutory interestlink3.gif calculator and is used for Single Premium PPIlink3.gif cases. It can also be used where rollover PPI is involved, i.e. a new loan re-financing a previous one and where PPI is included in one or more loans. It can also be used for S69 redress calculation on any sum, like on a closed/frozen interest PENALTY charges claim.

 

StatIntSheet v101.xls

 

see no.1. below

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

post up the spread please lets see.

 

[it should be one spread detailing all the payment s & rollover]

 

and ONE FOS CQ

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope you have enter the PPI in the MONTHLY format

on the dates you paid it.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes because it is paid back monthly

 

you need to read link 1 below

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's better

 

now that's for the first loan up until refinanced?

 

it might be better if you scan up the agreements

 

did you get all the statements?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's better

 

now that's for the first loan up until refinanced?

 

it might be better if you scan up the agreements

 

did you get all the statements?

dx

 

 

Hi, no thats all 4 loans.

 

post 194 has all the agreements, except the first one they couldnt at the time provide. was a v quick re loan period!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you ever sar'd citi?

 

ideally you need all the statements.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to follow link 1 below

 

had a loan which included a Single Premium PPI. It was initially an 8 year loan. After 6 yearslink3.gif I took out another loan which gave me some cash in my pocket and also paid off the balance on my previous loan. The second loan also had PPI included and the term of this new loan was 10 years. What do I claim?

 

This is another scenario where the banks can make more money from you, the unsuspecting “customer”. (Sometimes referred to as the victim).

 

We already know that if you had stuck with loan 1, your PPI part of the loan would have run for 8 years because it was included in the main loan. But you have effectively taken the balance on that loan after six years and transferred it into a new loan. Accordingly part of the balance transferred or “rolled over” into the second loan would have included the balance on the PPI part of loan 1. That balance would be paid off over the term of loan 2.

 

To see how the advantage is with the bank, consider this.

 

Your original loan was for 8 years so you would have originally have been paying the PPI part of the loan for that period. You refinance after 6 years and let us suppose that a sum of, say £400 being the PPI balance on the old loan, is rolled into loan 2.

 

Now the term of loan 2 is 10 years. So that balance of £400 is now being paid off over a period of ten years. And for those ten years you will be paying interest on that rolled over amount. Had you stuck with loan 1 only, then that £400 would have been paid off over only two years. You can see that this is a tidy profit for the bank.

 

And of course you have PPI on loan 2 as well and you’re paying that PPI off over a period of 10 years as well.

 

If we look a bit deeper, the PPI cover on loan 2 was actually covering you for some PPI on loan 1. So you have been sold PPI to cover PPI. What’s that all about then?

 

So who is the winner? It certainly isn’t you so I wonder who it could be?

 

So what about the calculation of the refund that is due?

 

First off you calculate the percentage of PPI which is included in the first loan as described above.

 

Second, we have to find out what the balance of the PPI part of loan 1 was when it was rolled into loan 2. That can be done using the loan progression spreadsheet.

 

Third, we have to express that balance as a percentage of the total of loan 2.

 

Fourth, we need establish the percentage of loan 2 that relates to the loan 2 PPI.

 

Then we need to enter the data into the spreadsheet.

 

This scenario is probably best explained using an example.

 

Let us suppose that we have established that loan 1 had a PPI percentage of 7.75% of the total of loan 1.

 

Let us say that we have worked out (or the bank have told us) that the balance on loan 1 at the time of refinancing is £1,500. We now know that 7.75% of that £1,500 is the PPI part of loan 1. 7.75% of £1,500 is £116.25 which is the amount of PPI rolled into loan 2.

 

Now let us suppose that loan 2 was for a total amount (including the PPI on loan 2) of £5,000 and that the loan 2 PPI premium included in that was £600.

 

The percentage of loan 1 PPI included in loan 2 is given by £116.25/£5,000 x 100 = 2.33%. So for every repayment you make on loan 2, a sum equivalent to 2.33% of it relates to PPI on loan 1.

 

Now we also now that of the £5,000 for loan 2, that included a PPI premium of £600, so loan 2 PPI percentage is £600/£5,000 x 100 = 12%. That means that for every repayment we make on loan 2, an amount of 2.33% of it is going to loan 1 PPI rolled over and an amount of 12% of it is paying the PPI on loan 2.

 

So to enter this in the spreadsheet you list the actual payments made for PPI on loan 1 prior to refinancing. From then on you list the 2.33% of each payment and annotate it as Loan 1 PPI and then you list the 12% of each payment which relates to the PPI on loan 2.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...