Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
    • Hungary is attempting to be a world power in manufacturing electric vehicle batteries, despite locals' reservations.View the full article
    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though. A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees. https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Repossession Order - Paragon 2nd Charge


Lolly68
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5016 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hiya, I wondered if someone can give me some advice. I have been in hospital for the past six months and got behind on my mortgage and my secured loan. My mortgage company (Birmingham Midshires) are very understanding and have let me pay off the arrears on top of my mortgage payment. However, Paragon have issued a repossession order whereby I have to go to court and state my case as to why I should not have my home repossessed. I owe £942.00. I missed about 6 months of payments previously but have made six month consecutive payments. I wrote to them back in March stating I was in hospital and would contact them when I got out. They ignored me.

 

I phoned them today to offer £100 on top of my monthly payment of £158 and the girl said I would have to pay £615 to stop repossession. I just have not got this sort of money at the moment. She said she would speak to her manager and get back to me. The thing I want to know is I thought they had to accept some sort of payment plan if one is offered? Or am I wrong?

 

Any comments gratefully received.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lolly

 

You have come to the right place for help.

 

If they do not accept your offer of £100 per month, then they are being unreasonable in my opinion.

 

I would have thought, because your arrears of £942.00 is not a significant amount, they would be very foolish to go to court. You are offering them the monthly payment plus £100 per month, which in reality would mean that they were cleared in 9 and a half months.

 

I would even bet that if they took you to court, that the Judge would side with you and order that amount anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lolly

 

You have come to the right place for help.

 

If they do not accept your offer of £100 per month, then they are being unreasonable in my opinion.

 

I would have thought, because your arrears of £942.00 is not a significant amount, they would be very foolish to go to court. You are offering them the monthly payment plus £100 per month, which in reality would mean that they were cleared in 9 and a half months.

 

I would even bet that if they took you to court, that the Judge would side with you and order that amount anyway.

 

Thank you for responding. Do you think that I should write to them offering it in writing as well? At least then the Judge would see that I had offered that amount. My payment is due on the 21st of the month so do you think I should pay them the extra then as well?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think that I should write to them offering it in writing as well? At least then the Judge would see that I had offered that amount.

 

Yes, then you can show the Judge that you have tried to sort it out without having to go to court. Make sure you send it recorded delivery so you can prove that they have received it.

 

My payment is due on the 21st of the month so do you think I should pay them the extra then as well?

 

Yes - But if you have the £100 now, why not pay it over the phone and then you would only owe £842.00 by the time they take any action. As long as you doing your level best to sort the arrears out, you are making then look like ogres.

 

Whilst you are paying this £100 by telephone, you could try and negotiate for them to accept your arrangement.

 

Does the £942.00 include any kind of charges, for late payments etc?

 

If so you could write asking them to refund them, or at least let the Judge know if you do go to court, that the amount they are claiming includes these charges.

 

I wouldn't hit them with the charges yet, until the agreement for repayment is made though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, then you can show the Judge that you have tried to sort it out without having to go to court. Make sure you send it recorded delivery so you can prove that they have received it.

 

 

 

Yes - But if you have the £100 now, why not pay it over the phone and then you would only owe £842.00 by the time they take any action. As long as you doing your level best to sort the arrears out, you are making then look like ogres.

 

Whilst you are paying this £100 by telephone, you could try and negotiate for them to accept your arrangement.

 

Does the £942.00 include any kind of charges, for late payments etc?

 

If so you could write asking them to refund them, or at least let the Judge know if you do go to court, that the amount they are claiming includes these charges.

 

I wouldn't hit them with the charges yet, until the agreement for repayment is made though.

 

The thing is I have lack of funds until I get paid on the 21st (which is still 10days before the hearing date). I think it includes all sorts of charges. I will have a look at the paperwork when I get home. I will send them a letter and hopefully they will reconsider...

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing is I have lack of funds until I get paid on the 21st (which is still 10days before the hearing date). I think it includes all sorts of charges. I will have a look at the paperwork when I get home. I will send them a letter and hopefully they will reconsider...

 

OK - Send the letter, make the monthly payment and the extra £100 when you get paid, that way you are showing determination to tackle the problem.

 

Even if they don't accept and they do take you to court, you won't lose your home. Try not to worry, easier said then done I know, but you will get all the help and advice that you need on here.

 

As long as you can afford your normal mortgage payment, plus the loan payment, and a chunk off the arrears, and can prove this to the Judge, he / she will make an order that you can pay the arrears at a rate that you can afford. There is case law, that can spread the arrears over the remaining term of your mortgage.

 

Ell-enn will probably pop up in here very soon to help you out, if you need any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK - Send the letter, make the monthly payment and the extra £100 when you get paid, that way you are showing determination to tackle the problem.

 

Even if they don't accept and they do take you to court, you won't lose your home. Try not to worry, easier said then done I know, but you will get all the help and advice that you need on here.

 

As long as you can afford your normal mortgage payment, plus the loan payment, and a chunk off the arrears, and can prove this to the Judge, he / she will make an order that you can pay the arrears at a rate that you can afford. There is case law, that can spread the arrears over the remaining term of your mortgage.

 

Ell-enn will probably pop up in here very soon to help you out, if you need any help.

 

Right I have faxed the offer to them and also sent it my recorded delivery. Thank you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right I have faxed the offer to them and also sent it my recorded delivery. Thank you!

 

No worries.

 

Once you find time, have a look at any charges that they have imposed and see if they are included in that arrears figure.

 

If any are for late payments or arrears management etc then they are unlawful so to speak. So for example if £300 charges are included in the £942.00 then your arrears are only actually £642.00 and not the £942.00

 

This is something Ell-enn can then add to any statement / N244 that may be required if they do not accept and you have to attend court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...