Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

unknown RWay CCJ for Cap1 card at old Address - already paid NCO!! **SET ASIDE**


Jossy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4710 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i doubt that capital one will be obliged to provide a response to a SAR if you no longer have dealings with them

 

It seems to me that since the original company is now ex tinct - you are not in fact going to "make them pay" and should forget this as a goal

 

To get the matter set aside is going to cost you £75 and you will not get this back (IMO) since the other party is no longer a legal entity

 

the claimant in a ccj cannot be assigned/sold to a third party as far as i am aware without the approval of the court therefore i assume it has not been assigned/sold since this is as rare as hens teeth

 

if you want it off your file before it falls off after 6 years then pay the £75 otherwise leave things until someone else tries to sue you and then demand proof of ownership of the debt.

 

it is my opinion that the new company are trying to cash in on a debt which is not theirs and was NOT transferred over to them from the old company legally - and even if it was- it is quite clear from the conversations that they will not be able to provide the documentation to prove it and it would have had to have been transferred BEFORE the CCJ was granted

 

if you go on the companies house website you should be able to get the details of the now defunct company to compare them with the new one so that you are able to show the court that the two companies are not one in the same.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

thanks for that info

 

as far as the "change of name " is concerned- i think it was stated originally that the company was dissolved or some such

if the new company has a different company number then it is a separate legal entity and cannot simply take over the assets of the defunct company informally

 

you need to check the formation date of the new company against the dissolution date of the old one (unless it WAS simply a name change of the existing company) and then refer any assignment dates

 

once the old company ceased to exist it then no longer was able to transact company business

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...