Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What is the value of the claim? Please can you post up the claim form in PDF format
    • Hello , sorry of this is in the wrong place. I have received in the post a County Court Claim claim form.  This relates to MYJAR and issued by TM Legal relating to a payday loan issued 11/2017, subsequently they issued a default notice 09/2018. The debt isnt on any credit reports.  4/4/2024 I had an email saying a Letter of claim was sent - this was not received , i replied to say I believed the debt was statue barred their response We are aware that the correspondence you have sent, is in a format that is circulated on consumer-based websites whereby debtors are encouraged to use the templates in order to avoid repayment of their debts. We do not accept that the contents of these templates bear any particular relevance to your case. For clarification, in line with the Limitations Act 1908, no claim may be brough after a period of 6 years from the cause of action. The cause of action in this instance is the Notice of Default served upon you by the original creditor on 24th September 2018. As such, the account is not Statute Barred. 10th June 2024 I have received a county court claim form and now i am unsure what to do next and how to complete and respond, I do not want a CCJ. Please help 
    • Please start your own topic in the following forum. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/121-financial-legal-issues/
    • Hello , sorry of this is in the wrong place. I have received in the post a County Court Claim claim form.  This relates to MYJAR and issued by TM Legal relating to a payday loan issued 11/2017, subsequently they issued a default notice 09/2018. The debt isnt on any credit reports.  4/4/2024 I had an email saying a Letter of claim was sent - this was not received , i replied to say I believed the debt was statue barred their response We are aware that the correspondence you have sent, is in a format that is circulated on consumer-based websites whereby debtors are encouraged to use the templates in order to avoid repayment of their debts. We do not accept that the contents of these templates bear any particular relevance to your case. For clarification, in line with the Limitations Act 1908, no claim may be brough after a period of 6 years from the cause of action. The cause of action in this instance is the Notice of Default served upon you by the original creditor on 24th September 2018. As such, the account is not Statute Barred. 10th June 2024 I have received a county court claim form and now i am unsure what to do next and how to complete and respond, I do not want a CCJ. Please help 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5077 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

4 yrs ago, i obtained a vehicle under lease from a finance company. During this period, i was in and out of work, and fell behind in my payments regularly. When the lease agreement was coming to the end of the term, i decided to return the vehicle rather than purchase it outright, as it no longer suited my purpose (all payments were up to date and there was no outstanding amount).

Within weeks, i received a final invoice from the finance company which included pictures of minor damages caused during ownership + labour charges (a total of just over 1,000 pounds).

I recall being flabbergasted by the amount...and wrote to the finance company stating the following "I disagree with your invoice in the sum of £1,xxx.xx. Clause xx of the contract states that I must return the vehicle to you in good condition (other than fair wear and tear). The condition of tyres and rims on the vehicle are deemed as "fair wear and tear" bearing in the age of the vehicle of 4 years. Also the labour quoted is very unreasonable."

I never got a reply....and let the matter lie.

 

Now 4yrs or so on, i received a visit from an HCEO in my absence in the form of a hand delivered letter shoved through the mailbox …"Notice of Legal Control of Goods" and "Walking Possession Agreement"...(delivered last week) ….naturally i'm freaking out!!!

 

The schedule is as follows:

A. Amount of Judgement £1242.xx

B. Judgement Costs £177.00

C. £7.75 at the rate of 8% per annum

D.Costs of Execution £101.75

E. Charges of the Authorised HCEO £xxx.xx!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:mad::confused::mad:

Amount to Levy: £2,xxx.xx:mad:

 

I have since received a second letter from their office dated 3 days after the first notice (via post) - Notice Of Seizure By HEO telling me that the amount has now increased to £2,441.50 and that if not settled that they will add a further £720 + VAT should they have to remove goods (I only saw the 2nd letter yesterday - and am extremely paranoid that any minute now that they can turn up and attempt to seize my goods, scaring the crap out of everyone – the additional fees just seem extremely excessive).

 

I work full-time and could scrape together the original judgment fees to the creditor, but the additional amounts have got to be ludicrous. What shall i do next...

(a) Contact the HCEO firm questioning the irregularity of the fees and establish what their Charges Of the Authorised High Court Enforcement Office consist of OR negotiate repayment within 12months??

(b) Contact my creditor (Finance Company) or their solicitor and agree to pay the full amount?? (I only wanted clarity on their valuation of the damage caused as i thought their costs were unfair - but they never replied, instead dragging me through the courts!) or finally.

© Take Civil Action and apply for a setaside???

 

I am keen to get the matter resolved quite quickly without incurring further costs – one could imagine the distress that this causes people.

P.S - How much time do i have between when the HEO visited and when they are likely to return?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you never got the court papers or the run up to it , get it set aside.

 

use our search for set aside

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 yrs ago, i obtained a vehicle under lease from a finance company. During this period, i was in and out of work, and fell behind in my payments regularly. When the lease agreement was coming to the end of the term, i decided to return the vehicle rather than purchase it outright, as it no longer suited my purpose (all payments were up to date and there was no outstanding amount).

Within weeks, i received a final invoice from the finance company which included pictures of minor damages caused during ownership + labour charges (a total of just over 1,000 pounds).

I recall being flabbergasted by the amount...and wrote to the finance company stating the following "I disagree with your invoice in the sum of £1,xxx.xx. Clause xx of the contract states that I must return the vehicle to you in good condition (other than fair wear and tear). The condition of tyres and rims on the vehicle are deemed as "fair wear and tear" bearing in the age of the vehicle of 4 years. Also the labour quoted is very unreasonable."

I never got a reply....and let the matter lie.

 

Now 4yrs or so on, i received a visit from an HCEO in my absence in the form of a hand delivered letter shoved through the mailbox …"Notice of Legal Control of Goods" and "Walking Possession Agreement"...(delivered last week) ….naturally i'm freaking out!!!

 

The schedule is as follows:

A. Amount of Judgement £1242.xx

B. Judgement Costs £177.00

C. £7.75 at the rate of 8% per annum

D.Costs of Execution £101.75

E. Charges of the Authorised HCEO £xxx.xx!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:mad::confused::mad:

Amount to Levy: £2,xxx.xx:mad:

 

I have since received a second letter from their office dated 3 days after the first notice (via post) - Notice Of Seizure By HEO telling me that the amount has now increased to £2,441.50 and that if not settled that they will add a further £720 + VAT should they have to remove goods (I only saw the 2nd letter yesterday - and am extremely paranoid that any minute now that they can turn up and attempt to seize my goods, scaring the crap out of everyone – the additional fees just seem extremely excessive).

 

I work full-time and could scrape together the original judgment fees to the creditor, but the additional amounts have got to be ludicrous. What shall i do next...

(a) Contact the HCEO firm questioning the irregularity of the fees and establish what their Charges Of the Authorised High Court Enforcement Office consist of OR negotiate repayment within 12months??

(b) Contact my creditor (Finance Company) or their solicitor and agree to pay the full amount?? (I only wanted clarity on their valuation of the damage caused as i thought their costs were unfair - but they never replied, instead dragging me through the courts!) or finally.

© Take Civil Action and apply for a setaside???

 

I am keen to get the matter resolved quite quickly without incurring further costs – one could imagine the distress that this causes people.

P.S - How much time do i have between when the HEO visited and when they are likely to return?

 

 

Clearly, you had disputed the debt and if you had received a summons then you should have replied when sending the form back to the court that you were disputing the debt.

 

I am therefore assuming that you had not received a summons.

 

If so, then you can contact the Court (details should be on the HCEO writ) and complete an N244 to set aside the Judgment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Subbing.

 

I have a friend in the very early stages of a Peugeot Passport finance return. She returned the car to Peugeot and only just received a bill for over £2000 for 'repairs'. She is the sort of person to ignore it, she is skint anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. So I have sent the n244 to the county court (didn't send a copy to the hceo). I also sent a letter to the hceo asking them to justify their add'l charges as they haven't levied any goods or I haven't signed anything (nobody was home when the noticenof seizure was posted through the tricking letter box!). This letter was also sent for the attn of the county court manager.

Both correspondences were sent by registered post

signed for! Am I on the right track?

 

What happens next? And what are my rights should the hceo appear whilst my letters are being considered by the county court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. So I have sent the n244 to the county court (didn't send a copy to the hceo). I also sent a letter to the hceo asking them to justify their add'l charges as they haven't levied any goods or I haven't signed anything (nobody was home when the noticenof seizure was posted through the tricking letter box!). This letter was also sent for the attn of the county court manager.

Both correspondences were sent by registered post

signed for! Am I on the right track?

 

What happens next? And what are my rights should the hceo appear whilst my letters are being considered by the county court?

 

What have you applied for on your application - is it just for Set Aside? On the same form you should also have applied for a Stay of Execution pending determination of your set aside application. If granted this would have halted any further enforcement action or charges.

 

The chances are the HCEO will write back and state that all charges have been applied in accordance with the HCEO Regulations. The letter on its own is not sufficient to stop further action and don't be surprised if they visit again. You could show him your set aside application and date if received but again enforcement may still proceed - the Stay of Execution is what is need.

 

It is not all bad news however. If you win your set aside the HCEO has to withdraw and all associated charges refunded/removed. If you do win do not rely on the Claimant advising the HCEO do it yourself by email and copy sent in the post.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
What have you applied for on your application - is it just for Set Aside? On the same form you should also have applied for a Stay of Execution pending determination of your set aside application. If granted this would have halted any further enforcement action or charges.PT

Thanks Ploddertom - I have done just as you advised, and asked for setaside and stay of execution pending setaside, based on the fact that no prior notice was received by myself prior to the HCEO appearing on my doorstep. I hve since received a reply from the court stating that my case has now been moved to my local county court. I expect to receive news of their decision to setaside or at least a stay of execution OR i guess a date of the hearing shortly - is that correct? , and how long am i expected to wait. I also copied in a letter to the County Court Manager about my concerns of the HCEO's excessive charges.

 

The chances are the HCEO will write back and state that all charges have been applied in accordance with the HCEO Regulations. The letter on its own is not sufficient to stop further action and don't be surprised if they visit again. You could show him your set aside application and date if received but again enforcement may still proceed - the Stay of Execution is what is need. PT

They have visited again, and in my absence have threatened to add more charges should they have to visit again. In the meantime, the Enforcement Office has not replied to my letter asking them to explain their excessive charges....7 days have passed now. What's my next move?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

They have visited again, and in my absence have threatened to add more charges should they have to visit again. In the meantime, the Enforcement Office has not replied to my letter asking them to explain their excessive charges....7 days have passed now. What's my next move?

 

You need to chase up with your local County Court and explain the urgency re the HCEO. In the meantime inform the HCEO Company of your actions - did you keep copies of your application - and reply you have had so far. Unfortunately they are doing nothing wrong at present but if they don't know what you are doing they can't guess.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...