Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

mmm have i been missold if there was no 'person' selling??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5080 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

OK as much info as poss as suggested as i cant seem to find any threads that seem to address these issues :confused::confused:

 

I have 4 credit cards all i believe with ppi i have several questions if you could be so kind?

 

from what i can remember 3 of the cards were applied for through postal applications during the time of 'give a dog a loan' period when cards were offered left right and centre. 1 was egg which to be honest cant quite remember how i applied maybe online maybe postal. but NONE were at anytime a face to face app so to speak cant really remember if i spoke to anyone on the phone either.

im in the process of requesting CCA so should have more info in the future (presuming they can find them:D) and will request sar etc if/when needed.

all of these cards are also currently in default at the mo and with dca's

 

questions

1 as these were 'distant' applications can they be defined as missold as i filled the app rather than having someone sell it to me or do they have duty of care to get in touch and explain issues etc?

 

2 does 1 ppi arrangement cover all credit arrangements or are they only for the individual cards i.e if i had 1 would i need more.?

 

3 as i say cant remember the apps but does having to tick a box to say you DONT want ppi be defined as disguised/misselling because i cant really see me asking specifically for it.?

 

4 i do remember having a letter a fair while ago about ppi stating i think a change in t&c or a continuation in ppi and to conact them if i wanted to cancel. where do i stand with this?

 

5 as they are currently in default will this hugely affect any attempt at a claim ie be argued im only claiming it as missold because im in financial difficulty or can i argue that i only understood/realised the situation with ppi when i now have studied my current finances.?

 

thanks in advance for any help given

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK as much info as poss as suggested as i cant seem to find any threads that seem to address these issues :confused::confused:

 

I have 4 credit cards all i believe with ppi i have several questions if you could be so kind?

 

from what i can remember 3 of the cards were applied for through postal applications during the time of 'give a dog a loan' period when cards were offered left right and centre. 1 was egg which to be honest cant quite remember how i applied maybe online maybe postal. but NONE were at anytime a face to face app so to speak cant really remember if i spoke to anyone on the phone either.

im in the process of requesting CCA so should have more info in the future (presuming they can find them:D) and will request sar etc if/when needed.

all of these cards are also currently in default at the mo and with dca's

 

questions

1 as these were 'distant' applications can they be defined as missold as i filled the app rather than having someone sell it to me or do they have duty of care to get in touch and explain issues etc?

 

matters not go get em.

 

2 does 1 ppi arrangement cover all credit arrangements or are they only for the individual cards i.e if i had 1 would i need more.?

 

per card

 

3 as i say cant remember the apps but does having to tick a box to say you DONT want ppi be defined as disguised/misselling because i cant really see me asking specifically for it.?

 

prob ticked by default that you want it, must untick it if you dont.

 

4 i do remember having a letter a fair while ago about ppi stating i think a change in t&c or a continuation in ppi and to conact them if i wanted to cancel. where do i stand with this?

 

you only just foundout it was mis-sold. due to media coverage

 

5 as they are currently in default will this hugely affect any attempt at a claim ie be argued im only claiming it as missold because im in financial difficulty or can i argue that i only understood/realised the situation with ppi when i now have studied my current finances.?

 

makes no odds , give you breathing space

 

thanks in advance for any help given

 

don't forget unlawful fees too.

 

 

TBH: you need to do some reading

all of those are std questions.

 

see: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/payment-protection-insurance-ppi/61081-ppi-some-notes-claimants.html

 

and the other stickys at the top of the ppi homepage

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thx dx your a star

 

i know there standard quest's spent the last few hours reading threads and understand the issues but was hard to find specifics to my issues as sooo many threads was just looking for clarity as most of the threads are relating to loans was just looking for confirmation on whether the face to face thing (or lack of) was an issue so thx.

 

right im off to 'go get em' :D:D

 

tx again ill update

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok

:D

 

 

hello guests............

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...