Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Problem with letting agency admin fee.......urgent help needed please!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5080 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone:)

 

I wonder if anyone can help me with this problem which I'm dealing with on behalf of my Son. He has just completed his final year at uni and is living in a rented house shared with one friend. He telephoned me this morning to ask if I could help him with a problem with his letting agent. The reason it is urgent is that he goes away for a fortnight tomorrow and needs to have it sorted before he goes as he has to give six weeks notice that he is leaving the property when his tenancy runs out at the end of August :confused:

 

My Son and his friend took out a one year shorthold tenancy on a house at the end of August 2009. Having just completed his finals my Son has decided to go travelling for a year with his girlfriend, but his friend has decided to keep the tenancy for a further year. Another friend is going to be moving in to take over my Son's room.

 

They have informed the letting agent that one of them is moving out at the end of August when the tenancy agreement runs out and that the other will be staying on. The letting agent has met the new tenant who is now in the process of completing guarantor paperwork etc.

 

Last week (while my Son was away visiting us) a letter arrived at the student house to say that he and the other current tenant have to pay an 'administration fee' of £176.25 because they are 'changing the terms of the contract'.

 

They cannot understand why this admin fee is being charged when they are not actually 'changing the terms of the contract' which will run to the end of its course before one tenant is replaced by another.

 

According to their current contract if they had both decided to continue the tenancy beyond the year's agreement they would have had -

 

'To pay the sum of £56.35 in respect of administration costs for any extention of the tenancy in respect of this property.'

 

Instead of this they are being charged £176.25 although one of them is remaining for another year.

 

Their contract states the following in respect of changes during the term of the tenancy -

 

'If at any time throughout the term of the tenancy a change of person or persons should occur, an administration charge will be levied of £172.50 in addition to any normal administration costs.'

 

My Son visited the letting agent yesterday to query this and pointed out that they were not changing person(s) during the term of the tenancy as he will remain in the property paying rent until the tenancy expires at the end of August at which point the new tenant will move in. Two girls at the letting agents attempted to justify what the admin fee was for, but couldn't do so.

 

They explained that as the property was not being fully vacated they are not able to check the state of the property, but said that as long as the new tenant was happy to take over the property as stated in the inventory, this was fine. The new tenant (who went with him to the letting agent) is perfectly happy with this. In any case, the letting agent only carried out a check on the state of the house a month ago at which point everything was fine.

 

There have been no problems with not paying the rent etc and as far as students go they have been good tenants - well my Son's friend is a mature student of 30!

 

The letting agents have said that they will not progress with arranging for the friend to take over as the new tenant until they have received the new tenant's application fee of £120 and the admin fee of £176.25 from the current tenants. The letting agent wants these monies paid tomorrow.

 

What my Son cannot understand is that according to the options of the tenancy contract the current tenants have two standard options -

 

1. Give six weeks notice to quit

 

2. Remain in property by renewing tenancy creating a 'rolling' tenancy

 

If they were to do the latter - which one of them is - they would not have to pay an admin fee of £176.25, but the lesser fee of £56.35.

 

Additionally, if they were to both give notice, then re-apply for the same property they would then only have to pay the £120 application fee (plus deposit) - less than they are being required to pay!

 

He believes that either the letting agent is confused over the fact that they are changing tenants during the term of the contract - which they are not.............or else that they are trying to take advantage of financially naive students who will just pay up because they believe they have to!

 

I have suggested that they ask the letting agents for a list of their admin costs incurred to prove that the fee of £176.25 is justified, but as he goes away tomorrow, time is short.

 

Apologies for the very long post and if anyone could advise on what (if anything) can be done about this I would be most grateful.

 

Many thanks,

 

Landy x

Edited by landy_alert
typo!
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think your son needs to go to Trading Standards and report the Letting Agent - how on earth they can justify the outrageous fees is a mystery. That is his best course of action at the moment.

 

You can also advise your son to contact CAB and get them to contact the letting agent regarding the high fees they are charging BOTH parties - something is wrong here.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think your son needs to go to Trading Standards and report the Letting Agent - how on earth they can justify the outrageous fees is a mystery. That is his best course of action at the moment.

 

You can also advise your son to contact CAB and get them to contact the letting agent regarding the high fees they are charging BOTH parties - something is wrong here.

 

Hi sillygirl:)

 

Thanks so much for your prompt response - it is most appreciated!

 

I will get him to do that - hopefully he will have time as he is off on hols tomorrow as I said. My husband has also said he will give the letting agents a call to give them a piece of his mind - not sure that's such a good idea though, but then he's not a Cag devotee like me who prefers to keep everything in writing these days!

 

Our son is also going to try to speak to someone at his uni - he has a appointment to discuss career prospects on campus tomorrow before he departs on his hols - so he will try to see someone in the accommodation office, although as it's not uni accom I don't know if they will be of any help............

 

In the meantime what should he do about not paying the fee? The letting agents are expecting him to go in tomorrow to hand over the cash and because of his need to give six weeks notice to quit (tenancy ends 26th August) he needs to arrange this before he goes away as he isn't back till 16th July.

 

Any advice on this would be most useful, thanks!

 

Will update with his progress on this.

 

Many thanks again,

 

Landy x

Edited by landy_alert
Link to post
Share on other sites

From what you have written, I will make the assumption that your son and the other tenant are joint tenants i.e. they are both named on the same tenancy agreement rather than having one each. I will also assume the tenancy agreement is an Assured Shorthold Tenancy (AST).

You have given the two options:

1. Give six weeks notice to quit

 

2. Remain in property by renewing tenancy creating a 'rolling' tenancy

While I totally sympathise with your position on these fees, you need to keep in mind that they are joint tenants i.e. they must both take the same course of action. You can’t have one giving notice and the other remaining in the property, it must be either or as there aren’t two tenants here there’s only one – the Joint Tenant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Planner:)

 

Okie dokie - I see your point. I'm trying to get hold of him now to check whether as you suggest he and his friend are indeed 'the joint tenant'......unfortunately he's not answering his phone at the mo. Will report back as and when I get hold of him.

 

Thanks for your input, btw!

 

Landy x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I'm afraid I have no meaningful issue as its not my area. However I just wanted to share my inability to believe that a company, any company, would seek to use an admin fee to make a profit.

 

Banks, airlines, Sky Virgin et all having penalties for not paying by DD. Surely any reasonable person can see we need a law to say an admin fee should be just that?

 

Hope you get something sorted, and I can imagine thier faces when anyone says so this fee what EXACTLY does it cover?

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi indebtstudent:)

 

Thanks for your reply - to be honest I'm not quite sure what my son did about this as he went away on holiday (to celebrate getting his degree - yippee!) the day after I started this thread and I didn't get a chance to speak to him first.

 

I have a feeling though that he probably ended up having to pay the fee as the general consensus (he also spoke to someone in the office at his uni) was that as a joint tenant it was unavoidable unfortunately.

 

He is back in the UK at the end of this week so hopefully I will get an update then.

 

Thanks again to everyone for their comments!

 

Landy x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Landy

 

I would be intrested to hear what your son did as i am in the same position myself with an agency trying to charge me £150 admin fee to have my name removed from a contract despite giving my notice to quite as per the CAB advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Landy

 

I would be intrested to hear what your son did as i am in the same position myself with an agency trying to charge me £150 admin fee to have my name removed from a contract despite giving my notice to quite as per the CAB advice.

 

Hi JAG007:)

 

Sorry to hear you are experiencing a similar problem. My son is due back in the UK on Friday so hopefully I will find out what the outcome was over the weekend and will post up to let you know.

 

Landy x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Landy

 

I would be intrested to hear what your son did as i am in the same position myself with an agency trying to charge me £150 admin fee to have my name removed from a contract despite giving my notice to quite as per the CAB advice.

 

Hi JAG007:)

 

Apologies for the delay in getting back to you on this. I spoke to our son today - unfortunately he said in the end he felt he had no option but to pay this fee, mainly because of the 'joint tenants' issue. It was paid prior to his departure on hols apparently.

 

Hopefully you get your issues resolved soon,

 

Landy x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi JAG007:)

 

Apologies for the delay in getting back to you on this. I spoke to our son today - unfortunately he said in the end he felt he had no option but to pay this fee, mainly because of the 'joint tenants' issue. It was paid prior to his departure on hols apparently.

 

Hopefully you get your issues resolved soon,

 

Landy x

 

Oh dear! Anything for a quiet life. Regrettably this supine attitude allows these agents to go on their bloodsucking ways.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh dear! Anything for a quiet life. Regrettably this supine attitude allows these agents to go on their bloodsucking ways.

 

I know Aequitas - it isn't how I hoped he would have dealt with it, but the difficulty lay that as he was going to be out of the country for two weeks during which time he was due to give notice to quit, he felt he had to resolve matters before he left...............

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really "on post" but just wanted to say that letting agents are not regulated in any and can basically charge whatever they like (and can get away with) and many do charge exhorbitant fees - not only to tenants but also to landlords - and get away with it because of so called "market forces". The other worrying thing is that many of them have absolutely no idea of landlord and tenant law!

Kentish Lass

Information given is based on my knowledge and experience and is not to be considered as legal advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...