Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Help with Link Financial & County Court


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4870 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Defend all the claim Selena.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Selena

 

Ok you state that the agreement contains PPI did you request this or is this mis sold?

Do you have any original statements upto the alleged Assignment in 2006?

If so it will show the PPI and give you a ball park figure to calculate during its life with MNBA.

Have you ever received a Default Notice from either MNBA or the current Muppet's?

Have you ever received a Notice of Assignment from either?

Have you retained copies of your bank statements showing all payments to Plink.My reckoning is that you have paid roughly £1800.00 which as vanished into thin air therefore the balance should be £4086.00 less their interest less legal fees less PPI.

If you can have a play with the figures you could more or less eradicate the whole balance and keep this to SCT (Small Claims Track) if any track at all if the balance is less £1000.00.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent re the statements,with regards to the PPI you would need a copy of your agreement to see if the PPI option was ticked.If you are/were in full time employment at the time of application,you may have well ticked it but you would need to request this to validate it.

IMHO link wont respond, so dont sit and wait be pro active, get your figures together and establish if you can use the mis sold PPI route also.

The in correct figures are enough to get the claim dismissed alone if you can prove the PPI also before your deadline to submit your defence you can submit your counterclaim at the same time.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Selena

 

As this is a MCOL Northampton you will have submitted your defence on line and therefore there is no time restriction as long as its on the date for submission.I trust you printed your receipt off after submission and retained as proof of input?

 

Think carefully before submitting any Application Notice (N244) this claim for all intense and purposes should be SCT after further investigations of your missing payments,which you will get chance to raise at AQ completion,therefore I personally would not waste the application fee of £75 for documents that you can request at AQ stage.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link Financial's claim will be moved from the Northampton county court bulk centre to your local county court.

You will then receive an AQ (Allocation Questionaire).

 

Not necessarily AC, Selenas Defence will be forwarded to the Claimant for a response.They then have 28 days to respond (you will be informed of this Selena by Northampton}.

If the Claimant wishes to respond then it will be transfered to your local CC and AQs will be released.

If they fail to respond within the 28 days the claim is stayed.How long would be until the Claimant does respond and makes payment to resurrect the claim.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi AC & Andy

 

I'm worried now as my defence only stated that Link didn't respond to my resquest under CPR 31.14 and submitted an embarassed defence. Thats the norm with link claims:D

 

 

I'll spend the whole next 28 days worrying about the outcome!!! Why ?

 

Regards Selena

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You didnt actually expect to get one Selina did you?;)

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under CPR 31.14, she should have.:eek:

 

Time to use CPR 31.15, of which they have 7 days to comply.Dont bother Link will not respond.

 

After that, it will be a Draft or for Directions, when the AQ is received.;)

 

Unless, Andyorch has a better plan?

:rolleyes:

 

I advised my plan Post 36 14th July.

 

Think carefully before submitting any application noticelink3.gif (N244) this claim for all intense and purposes should be SCT after further investigations of your missing payments,which you will get chance to raise at aqlink3.gif completion,therefore I personally would not waste the application fee of £75 for documents that you can request at aqlink3.gif stage.

 

 

Selena all is explained with regard to Stays Post 39 18th July.

 

Regards

 

Andy

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Having said that I wouldn't have known this case was Stayed, if I hadn't contacted the Court, As they haven't even informed of this in writing.

Nobody is informed when a case is stayed that is the procedure of the Court. Hence the Notification of " your defence has been forwarded to the Claimant they have 28 days to respond etc etc if they fail to respond the case will be stayed etc etc"

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Selena

 

Think very carefully before instigating your own litigation against someone you are already involved in a case with.Your case is stayed with no apparent reason from the Claimant.

I would advocate dealing with your matter before instigating more.The cost of issuing a summons could be better put towards striking out the Claimants case.They can only remain stayed for so long before they must provide explanation to the court what their intentions are.Think carefully!!!!

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Completely agree with all you state SF. Take a look at my posts I never take any prisoners.Selina is a fairly new member and needs to take one step at a time.Instigating Litigation against MBNA on a DPA matter is not going to resolve the current matter with Plink,

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

The Claimant does not contact the Court for Directions the claim is stayed because they have not responded to your defence.Why send you letters when they can just make application and fee lift the stay and proceed??? Who blinks first!!!!!8)

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...