Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Feeling tempted to cancel it now but scared that some of the debts will do more Ccj on me and I'll have to wait 6 years again.  2 of the Ccj come of this year and then I'll only have the iva in credit file - so effectivly if I'd have not took out the iva I 2021 I'd have clear score by now - but then again would I because I would have been hounded the last 3 years so as bad as it is it's saves me lots of headaches whilst my debt was still within the 6 year mark.  I think most of them are near there but in all honesty no point chasing them if I do cancel iva I'd jjst wait for the ones who contact me and then start the relevant letter process on them.  Of over 6 years easy if not still possible to write off.    My true victory would be having the iva wiped off my credit file as misold or something that way I. Don't have to wait till 2027 Other option is to fight back and ask for them to offer the creditors to accept payments so far and use the following method    Will your IVA firm agree to complete your IVA on the basic of funds paid to date? The Guidance lists a lot of factors to be considered in deciding whether a settlement on the basis of funds paid to date should be proposed. You should read the list. But that may not give you any feel for whether they apply to you or not. The following are my thoughts on when an IVA should be treated as settled, not failed. They assume that you have £75 or less to pay a month: if you would currently qualify for a Debt Relief Order, then your IVA should be settled now  There is no point in making your IVA fail and you have to apply for a DRO – it will not generate another penny for your creditors. If you are renting and owe less than £50,000, check the DRO criteria now and talk to National Debtline on 0808 808 4000 about whether you qualify. You may have been told at the start of your IVA that you aren’t eligible – still check now as the DRO criteria have changed, your situation has got worse, and some people were given incorrect information about DROs at the start. if you have no assets that would be realised in bankruptcy (eg a house with equity, car worth over £2000), then your IVA should be settled now Same as (1), there is no point in making you apply for bankruptcy after your IVA fails. if your only asset is a car that is worth less than £8000, then your IVA should be settled now A car that is worth say £5000 would normally be sold in bankruptcy and you would be given a small amount to buy a cheaper car. But your creditors would not get any benefit from this as the Insolvency Service takes the first £8000 raised to cover its own costs. if you have significant assets, the closer you are to the end of the IVA, the less reasonable it is to fail it If you have been paying your IVA for 4 years, you have done your best over a long period. It isn’t your fault you can no longer continue. The fact you may have had equity to release isn’t relevant as that simply isn’t going to be possible. if your situation will clearly improve soon, then it’s unlikely your IVA will be settled I mean real improvements, not hoping that prices fall. If I can get them to accept payment to date or threaten with cancellation hopefully they may accept it -    Other option is to try and borrow money and pay make a full and final offer    Or I can just ignore and hope for the best which I'm very tempted to do especially if they respond to my review with bullying tactics despite me being skint as a fart with no mortgage as renting    It's so stressful but I've just checked the iva agreement from 2021 and it's Cabot 2 account Lowel about 5 accounts and then lots of repeats of the same debt with for example zopa and Cabot same amount listed twice -  also loyyds banks but I'm sure that's older than 6 years and not on credit file anyway    If I can somehow remove the iva from my creitt file I'd be happy   
    • Sorry I meant credit fix - I really wish I'd known this before - kicking myself right now  If they come back to me asking for more money I'll cancel it and start trying to deal with the debt myself let's see what they say 
    • India has one of the world's fastest growing economies but the benefits are yet to fully reach the poorest.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

northern Bank charges reclaim **WON**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1879 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

What a top site,first of all!!This has been a long time coming,IMHO

 

Anyway-sent off to Northern Bank in Belfast initial request for charges/statements on 27th April via recorded delivery.Heard nothing back as yet....

 

This outfit take every small window of opportunity to beat you around the head with charges for letters,unpaid direct debits etc-so I'm looking forward to a bit of payback.At a rough reckon(very rough) I could be looking at £1500-£2000.

 

2003/04 was a particularly bad year for us,because I was off work on the sick and got down to nil pay-cheques were bouncing,DD's weren't paid and credit card companies were over me like a rash

 

 

Time for some payback!!Up next-

 

CITI CARDS

MBNA

BARCLAYCARD

NATWEST CARDS

CAPITAL ONE

RBS ADVANTA

 

Can't wait to see them squirm!!!:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 254
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Best of luck Matey !

 

That is one helluva crazy user name !

 

 

Thanks!!This site inspires confidence to such a degree that you just want to get stuck in!!

 

The user name comes from one of my 7 year old son's expressions-he comes out with some good ones!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The user name comes from one of my 7 year old son's expressions-he comes out with some good ones!!

 

LMAO, Thought y'ad been pulled over one too many times by the 'Can ya wind yer windy down pleez sir!' crew. ;)

 

Anyway, good luck with NB ;)

 

mori

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope you get the charges info you requested without too much trouble

In the light of the problems Yorkshire/Clydesdale customers are facing in getting responses to their DPA requests, remember that Northern Bank was also part of National Australia Group until last year when it was sold to Danske.

Bye the way, love your username, must tell my teenage son to add to his collection.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will be watching this with interest.

I send off my initial letter this week for my list of charges but I don't expect to hear from them anytime soon! The clock is ticking...........

 

The Northern love charging for everything, so I will take great delight in asking for it back. I have found a lot of my old statements so if they don't get back to me I will use what I have to start with and go from there.

 

Best of luck and I love the username it's excellent.

 

Jules

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

how's this for bank efficiency?

 

Sent DPA on 27 April-no response.

Sent reminder letter 24 may and got a letter in this morning.They claim to have lost my original letter,and tracked it down after receipt of my reminder.Top class service so far!!

 

They now claim to have 40 days from May 30 to comply,but will try with "every possible effort" to have this information for me next week.

 

They had better otherwise their arse is in a sling-it's my timetable,not the Northern's!!

 

Anyway,they claim that manual intervention is applied in all circumstances of charges applied-*YEAH RIGHT*-but that it would take a disproportionate effort to get me the details.

 

They are also looking for £6 per page of statements prior to April 2004,because they can't be bothered to get off their lazy arses to get me them.

 

If they think I'm falling for this they must be located on Mars-I know that Abbey customers got the same run around.Can anyone point me to a thread where this was comprehensively dealt with?

Link to post
Share on other sites

today's update-

big box arrived stuffed to the gills with statements,and a letter.Unfortunately for the northern,they only sent me statements dating back to April 13,2004-statements prior to that "are not readily available",apparently.....they also have refused to send me a list of details of charges levied,as primarily requested,as these would "already have been furnished in statements already issued".ANOTHER REFUSAL-this is getting good!!

 

well,after 6 June,the Northern are in breach of the DPA request,and will be reported to the IC if I don't get the rest by then-and I'm not expecting them to provide them.They are asking £6 per page for them-so obviously they are readily available-they just want their pound of flesh for those as well-SORRY MR NORTHERN,NO CAN DO!!!:D

 

Also,they seem to find it a "disproportionate effort " to furnish me with hard evidence of manual intervention in the application of charges,and I have asked for this TWICE in wiriting.Judge is gonna love that- LOL!!!

I wonder why it would be too much of an effort-perhaps even the Northern have realised that you can't find something that doesn't exist..... ;)

 

Anyway-I am going forward on this basis for the Northern to consider-

 

I have totted up the charges for the 2 years statements issued to us,and they come to a rather healthy £1791!!Now I am going to estimate a total for the 5 years we have been with them on the basis of 2/5 of 5 years =£1791

 

so 5 years estimated charges =(£1791/2)x5=£4475.50

 

and let them prove otherwise by giving me hard evidence,or else they will throw the dolly out of the pram and completely refuse to play.Either way-they are going to come in in second place.

 

I feel a fight coming on.....:D;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

to cut a long story short-

 

Northern Bank have now twice refused to supply me with statements prior to April 2004,and any list of charges whatsoever,on grounds of "disproportionate effort needed" -total crap,I know

 

They will supply me with statements prior to 2004 at the very reasonable rate of £6 per sheet!!How nice-so they are obviously available-but cannot provide proof of manual intervention,which they claim is applied in all cases-did you ever hear so much nonsense!!

 

anyway-we have tallied up for the 2 years out of the 5 that we have been with them and that they have sent details for.It amounts to £1791.What I am thinking of doing is this-divide £1791 by 2 to get a figure for 1 year,and multiplying that by 5 to get an estimate for 5 years-comes to £4475.50.

 

If they can't be bothered to send me what I want,is it reasonable for me to request repayment of £4475.50?It would clearly not look to good for them if they suddenly are able to dig out the information I require.

 

The 40 day DPA compliance expires Tuesday 6 June.

 

Appreciate any help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add - no court is going to accept the "disproportionate effort" argument, when they have said they can supply the information for £6 per sheet. These people do like to shoot themselves in the foot. :lol:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what will happen if you OVER estimate your charges?

Data Protection Act letter sent 10/04/2006,

priliminary letter sent 23/05/06,

LBA sent 7/06/06

claim issued 23/06/06

deemed to be served 25/06/06

Abbey Acknowledged with intent to defend, they have got until: 23/07/06

50% offered + interest, rejected: 21/07/06

AQ recieved 27/07/06,

AQ posted back 09/08/06

Court date 13/12/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

what will happen if you OVER estimate your charges?

 

In this case it would be for the bank to challenge the figures you give - and provide evidence to support that challenge. Should it go to court I cannot see that a judge would side with Abbey when clearly they were being obstructive over providing the information in the first place.

 

Of course when they do provide the evidence, then the matter could either be settled in the usual way before a hearing at the corrected amount - or the claim could be changed with any additional court cost being added to the claim, since it was Abbeys fault.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Would it be fair to guess that you are in N. Ireland (like me)?

 

If so I believe the max you can claim for in one go is up to 2,000 in the small claims, which would cover the 1791 that you currently know about. You could run that one through and then come back again for the remaining amount , by this time they will know that you mean business and will be more willing to deal with you, or am I just being hopefull.

 

The above may be just nonsense, if it is let me know:)

 

Bye for now

 

Jim

Nothing done yet, Just arrived at the site recently, but the following banks etc will be hearing from me

Nationwide acc 1

Nationwide acc 2

Nationwide acc 3

My MBNA

Wifes MBNA

My Citibank

Wifes Citibank

My GE Money

Wife's GE Money - £78.85 - Preliminary letter sent 5/6/06

Mint - £140.00 - Preliminary letter sent 5/6/06

Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jim

yes you're right,I'm in the orchard county;)

 

You are also right about the £2000 limit,but a way round this has been suggested by claiming for each separate year....

 

I see you're going after the MBNA-they are fairly straightforward to beat,it seems.I had total success with precious little effort.If you need any help,just PM me...

 

all the best

Link to post
Share on other sites

tomorrow is June 6(how appropriate)-D Day for the Northern Bank.They still haven't given me full disclosure,and I'm not expecting anything in the morning.

 

So,estimated charges for the 5 years of £4477.50 will be duly requested-let's see what happens-will they tell me to sod off,or will they miraculously come up with the information I requested?:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lickthewallfatboy

 

Did you have any joy from the Northern?

I got my DPA response today (10th being the dead line) I take it my letter was the same as yours - "would require a disproportionate effort" but I can have the outstanding statements for £6.00 each sheet!

What are you doing now? I did not recieve much info at all about 12 sheets in total. In my case they have said that I recieved all other info in 2003 (the last DPA I served on them) trouble is that I didnt recieve it then either but didnt take it any further as in that case I got what I was looking for.

Did they provide a guide to understanding their abbreviations?

Are you going to ask the IC Office for an assessment or straight to court with your figures estimated?

 

Dont want to hijack your thread just very interested in your case as I am obviously only a couple of days behind you.

Very interested to hear your next move.

 

 

Goood luck

Cat

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Cat

 

glad to know there's someone else at my shoulder with the Northern!

 

I have sent the letter(yesterday) with the estimate for £4477 as they have now twice refused to provide me with all the information I need.So they will either freak out and refuse to budge,or freak out and send me the details I asked for,but I don't expect them to cough up the manual intervention notes:rolleyes:

 

I will leave the IC out of this (about the DPA breach) until I get a reply to my letter.Then I will make my mind up about what to do about that,depending on the content of the response.I genuinely expect this to go to small claims,but as this is limited to a max of £2k,I am inviting opinion as to the way forward on that front,as regards multiple claims for separate years etc etc.

 

We do live in interesting times,to paraphrase a well known chinese proverb.....

 

all the best to you Cat-if you need a listening ear,just post here or PM me.I'll try to help and give moral support where I can.

 

How much are you getting into them for?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good to hear from you Lickthewallfatboy

 

Fairly complex case going back 6 + years They had our business account per accounts, life policys, PPP, mortgage, loan (they owned us for 13 years) They shut all accounts in Feb 2003 and I have fought with them about being mis sold PPP which resulted in the accounts being closed.

Quick count of what I have so far is £1895 and counting. No statements before 2001 were provided and 2000 was the worst year so I do want them.

Considering paying for statements £6.00 per sheet to get figures correct before court for charges (as the IC Office can be a very lengthy process) and then adding costs to claim.

 

Cat

 

My blood runs cold every time I see the logo or walk past a branch. This is very personal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a thought re the amount you have to claim you may end up in the high court and there appear to be all sorts of possibile downsides to that. Can a joint high court claim be entered by all the people claiming off the Northern. I have no legal experience but the solicitors do it for groups of people eg. smokers against the tabacco companies.

 

Are you of a legal mind? You do seem fairly sussed.

 

Cat

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...