Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks in advance for advice! I was shocked to find out when doing a credit score search this weekend that I have a CCJ in my name. I've spoken to the courts today and have been told Vehicle control services have taken me to court for parking without a permit in my own allocated parking bay that came with my flat rental. The CCJ appears to be to the right apartment block but the wrong address.  It dates back to 2017. The judgement was passed in April 2021 without my knowledge of the ticket or the case ( presumably fine information was sent to the wrong address) I had already been taken to court by VCS previously for parking in my own bay and I won. It seems to me that this is underhanded behaviour from VCS as they had my address from previous interactions and had tried taken me to court for something that a judge had previously ruled on. I'm seeking advice on next steps. I was told by court that i can raise a dispute on the CCJ but I also want to appeal the case altogether. Should I be filing an  N244 Application Notice with an N161? I was told I should pay the court £303. Now that I've got home and had a look, there is a long list of court fees so I'm not sure which is applicable. I was also told the £303 is not refundable. Should I be filing a counterclaim or is that something that can be done at a later date. Ultimately I feel disgusted at having a ccj and then having to pay for the privilege of getting it removed. Any advice on how to make VCS pay for this would be appreciated!
    • Speaking of Truss, another French politician has used her as an example of economic illiteracy. Edouard Phillippe, the ex-PM was on BFM TV this morning.
    • an aperitif before the trumpy main event   Alex Jones must sell assets to pay $1.5bn to Sandy Hook victims as Infowars spared WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Alex Jones, a right-wing conspiracy theorist, falsely claimed the 2012 Sandy Hook shooting was a hoax  
    • As gesture of goodwill, we were eventually given a courtesy car from Mercedes (after numerous complaints from us on their lack of communication / misdiagnosis / time they’ve had the car - we’re now at over 4 weeks without our car) They have literally just informed us it will be ready to collect tomorrow. If we pay the cost, where will we stand? It’s so hard to understand what we should do 😫 we will re open our complaint with the finance company then. We emailed Doves yesterday informing them of all the problems (we have touched base with them and let them know prior to this) but they are yet to respond.    Any further advice would be greatly appreciated! 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

***Ell-en*** please help urgent advice needed


web2005
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4963 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I remember ELL en bringing up s.36 of the administration for justice act 1970,this had slipped my mind at the time,in the case of B.O.S V Elmes in 98.You see s.36 allows a judge impose a payment plan in which the borrower can underpay as long as normal payments and arrears can be paid off in a reasonable period.If i were you i would use this case law as the central pillar of your n244 defence,along with your own circumstances.

 

Thanks again. You are very helpful. Problem is I have no idea how to put this information or refer to this case best in N244 application. Please help me with this. Sorry for my poor knowledge if I am asking something basic. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Right,so what you need to do here is exactly as i did,and wait for the eviction order,you can always ring your local county court or bailiffs office there to check if the eviction notice has been issued,that way your one step ahead,then when you recieve the eviction notice send in your completed n244 defence.A.S.A.P.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I take this is something I can only do after the eviction order? I thought i can fill the N244 in advance on the basis that I qualify for HMS scheme but BM is not accepting me on the grounds that when I come out of the scheme I wont be able to pay normal monthly payment plus towards arrers. My argument is when i come out of this scheme I will be out of fixed rate which is 7.8%. so I will be able to pay normal monthly payment plus £300 towards arrears.

 

This is what Shelter England advised me. Don't you think I should submit N244 on these grounds before actual eviction order. I am nervous once the eviction has been ordered it will be too risky for me and I will end up loosing my home.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is where i wish Ell en was here,she,s really good with stuff like this.I have only ever filled in one of these once,mind you i did win so must have done something right.Im assuming you have not done this before so we need to start from the begining,have you got the form in front of you.?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doing anN244 now is much better than leaving it until eviction or after eviction, you have FAR less chance of getting things done then.

 

BM are not supposed to be judging you on what happens when you come out of the help scheme, they are not judge AND jury on this.

 

I would put in a statement stating

 

BM do not consider my application for the mortgage help scheme to be valid, despite previous evidence of my actual salary....

 

That should put the wind into their sails.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right in answer to your last post,that defence seems a little shakey to me and heres why,your relying on convincing a judge that B.M are being unreasonable in not considering you for the the scheme,you only need to go before a somewhat lender biased judge and your up the creek.What you need is some good case law to back up your defence,of course you can include the above in your statement,but dont use it as your central argument,as i wouldnt hold out too much hope.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Web, if you can hang on for half an hour or so I'll help you with the N244 - I need to go and pick up my son.

 

Don't panic, there's always something we can do.

 

Ell

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You see you put your n244 forn into the county court to apply to suspend a court judjement on whatever grounds,you have not got that judgement yet as no application by the lender for eviction has gone before the court.The notice would read ,the court has issued a warrant for possession of the above property.Once you have this you can then apply through n244 for that warrant to be suspended.

Link to post
Share on other sites

However i would wait for B.Ms next move after you have paid your instalment it may not even get as far as a court hearing,they may well be willing to play ball on this.My advice would be to hold back for the moment,keep the option of n244 in your mind in case they refuse to your proposal,if they dont,use s.36 case law to bolster your defence at a future hearing in the court.Thats the way i would aproach this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, I need some info before we go any further,

 

 

  1. Is the mortgage only in your name?
  2. Do you have any children living with you?
  3. Do you have a statement showing all the payments you have made?
  4. When you applied for the HMS did you keep copies of the application and did the lender write to you refusing the application?
  5. Do you have anything to prove your payments will reduce after May 2011?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, I need some info before we go any further,

 

 

  1. Is the mortgage only in your name?
  2. Do you have any children living with you?
  3. Do you have a statement showing all the payments you have made?
  4. When you applied for the HMS did you keep copies of the application and did the lender write to you refusing the application?
  5. Do you have anything to prove your payments will reduce after May 2011?

 

Thanks newstarter, Ell-en and others. I much appreciate your help. Ell-en, here is the requested information:

 

1) Mortgage is in joint names with my sister who is married with children and living in rented property. She ha been helping me with £400 towards mortgage payments.

2) no children living with me. I am married with wife but no children yet.

3) All the payments have been made on phone using my debit card. I can produce bank statements.

4) For HMS application I didn't fill or sign any application form. My case was with collections team in BM. Account manager from collections department filled the application form. I sent all the required paper work to them. According to collections department they forwarded all this to HMS team who rejected my application. I received a rejection letter in writting. I am surprised now that why they didn't ask me to sign the application form?

5) My payments will reduce because I will come out of fixed rate deal. When I was discussing this with BM this afternoon, I was told that I am in fixed rate deal till October 2011 NOT May. I was thinking it was 3 years fixed rate and becasue I took this mortgage in May 2008, fix rate will end in May 2011. According to BM although it was 3 years fixed rate but fixed slightly over 3 years.

 

Do you see any hope in my case? Again, I much appreciate all your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

However i would wait for B.Ms next move after you have paid your instalment it may not even get as far as a court hearing,they may well be willing to play ball on this.My advice would be to hold back for the moment,keep the option of n244 in your mind in case they refuse to your proposal,if they dont,use s.36 case law to bolster your defence at a future hearing in the court.Thats the way i would aproach this.

 

Thanks newstarter. We already have a suspended repossesion order issued last year in June. Order is for the normal monthly payment of £2200 plus £100 towards arrears. I want to apply to court to put aside the issued judgement and allow me to pay £1700 for net few months either under HMS scheme or by considering my current circumstances. Don't you think it makes sense to apply now rather waiting for eviction orders?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have a statement from them showing arrears charges being added to the account?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received statements from them. not sure if charges are added. I will try to find those statement and get back to you with answer. On the phone when i asked the same question to BM they said no charges have been applied as it will be illegal. Need to check this in the satement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The latest statement I have is dated 11 May 2010. Statement start date is 11 February 2010. It lists payments due for Feb, March and April. it also shows payments made for these months. After this there is Charges heading but nothing mentioned. Doesn't say anything aobut th charges. It also display Statement close date being 11 May 2010, Account balance:XXXX and arrears: £23,596.09.

 

No information about charges. I take this means no charges applied?

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, let me think about the best way to deal with this. The arrears are high - even when you have a better paid job and come out of the fixed rate it would take many years to pay them off - even citing the Norgan case, we would need a very good judge.

 

Have you asked them to capitalise the arrears? (i.e. add them onto the end of the mortgage). How many years are left on the mortgage?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have 22 years left on the mortgage. I haven't asked them recently to capitalise arrears but few months ago they rejected this proposal. Once out of fixed rate next year, my mortgage could be something like £1300 per month. This is what shelter England said that I need to explain to judge that if I pay £1700 for next 12 months, arrears will increase by onther £6000 to £30000. Arrers will increse for next 12 months but next year I can start paying arrears back by making £500 payment towards arrears. This will clear arrears in 5 years. I have been told that resonable time to clear used to be 2/3 years but recently this has been changed to be around 5 years.

 

Do you see this could be ground to make application?

Link to post
Share on other sites

@web2005

 

Having been through nearly the same, ie repossession from the same lender, I know exactly where you are coming from.

 

This time last year we had 2 weeks before we were being kicked out of our home. I didn't give up and constantly kept in touch with them. Granted my arrears were half your total though.

 

I found BM quite helpful tbh and they eventually suspended all action and also came to an arrangement, of which I have now managed to pay off the arrears as such.

 

The way I did it was, to pay them 2 months arrears initially, (luckily we managed to get this amount of money together) and then prove to them that I could afford the payments thereafter. Then we had to pay £1000 a month on top of our normal monthly payment, which totalled roughly your £1700 per month. I didn't even go to any court sessions, as my wife hid all the paperwork and tried to deal with it herself.

 

In January this year BM rang me out of the blue and told me that as I had paid 6 months without default, and also 2/3rds of the arrears had been paid, they would capitalise the remaining 1/3rd - I know this doesnt help you at the moment, but there was / is light at the end of the tunnel.

 

Is there anyway you can get them a lump sum to bring the total arrears down? Maybe that would help sway your case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@web2005

 

Having been through nearly the same, ie repossession from the same lender, I know exactly where you are coming from.

 

This time last year we had 2 weeks before we were being kicked out of our home. I didn't give up and constantly kept in touch with them. Granted my arrears were half your total though.

 

I found BM quite helpful tbh and they eventually suspended all action and also came to an arrangement, of which I have now managed to pay off the arrears as such.

 

The way I did it was, to pay them 2 months arrears initially, (luckily we managed to get this amount of money together) and then prove to them that I could afford the payments thereafter. Then we had to pay £1000 a month on top of our normal monthly payment, which totalled roughly your £1700 per month. I didn't even go to any court sessions, as my wife hid all the paperwork and tried to deal with it herself.

 

In January this year BM rang me out of the blue and told me that as I had paid 6 months without default, and also 2/3rds of the arrears had been paid, they would capitalise the remaining 1/3rd - I know this doesnt help you at the moment, but there was / is light at the end of the tunnel.

 

Is there anyway you can get them a lump sum to bring the total arrears down? Maybe that would help sway your case.

 

Thanks letsdothis. Unfortunatly my arrears are very high and can't arrange to bring them down by paying lump sum. I understand levels of arrears is making my case most difficult and this is my worry that with these much arrears judge will stright away turn down my application.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Web sorry i couldnt get back to you last night,i was called out.You see i suppose you could go to court and ask for the possession order to be set aside but you would have to show that the order should not have granted in the first place due to whatever reasons,that would be hard to do considering the level of arrears.You can yes but,or what if but if,s and but,s will not cut it with a judge.Remember you are asking to defer normal payments plus arrears payments for another 17 months which already breaks a previous court order,that in itself wont go down well in court,so arguing that you have been turned down for the rescue scheme as your central argument is going to be weak to say the least.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will call BM again today to get breakdown of arrears. As I metioned the last statment I received listing last 3 months transaction don't show any charges added but I am still not covinced the amount of arrears doesn't include any charges. Currently arrears are at £23596 and my monthly payment is £2200. I have this mortgage since May 2008. To be on this level of arrears means I didn't pay anything for 10 months. I don't think this is the case. Initially I missed couple of months payments but since last year June I have been paying regularly though not full payments. Before last year, I missed payments here and there but it was not like I didn't pay at all for 5/6 months? I will call BM customer support and try to get break down of arrers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Web, I've given your situation a great deal of thought, and I can't pretend it's not going to be difficult for you to convince a judge that you should keep your property.

 

This is what the judge will consider:

 

Negatives -

Your current income does not support the monthly payments

You are asking to pay reduced payments for another 17 months thus increasing the arrears, not reducing them

You have no evidence that you will get a better paid job

 

Positives -

When you come out of your fixed rate deal your monthly payments will reduce to a level which will allow you to make additional payments to reduce the arrears.

 

The only thing we could pin our hopes on is that the judge will consider the Elmes case law, however you are asking for reduced terms for a long period of time - previous cases have shown the reduced term to be around 3 - 6 months. Alternativel,y prove that you are trying to sell the property - is there any equity in it?

 

What you have to do now is consider whether you should be trying to keep a property that you will be struggling to pay for over the next 17 months, and then be committed to large arrears payments for the next 5+ years (assuming the lender will agree to that and I don't think they will!). I know that's probably not what you want to hear, but we have to be practical. Please give it some serious thought, the £1,700 you'd pay on 27th would go a long way towards a deposit for a rental property and removal costs etc.

 

If you decide to fight to keep the property then I will help you with the N244, but you need to really think about this and be prepared in case the decision goes against you.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ell-en. I know I am in difficult situation. There seems to be no way out except selling off the property which I was thinking the last option. Even if I am allowed to pay £1700 for next 5/6 months that would help me to arrange for extra money towards normal monthly payments. During this time I might manage to find a better job or start looking for selling property.

 

I am still curious why I am not allowed in HMS scheme. I believed this scheme was for people in similar situation. Whoever is approved under this scheme for 2 years pay 30% of the interest only. After 2 years they end up with huge arrears.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are going to sell the house you need to move quickly and get an estate agent in to value it. If you are to avoid repossession then you will need documentary proof of the house being for sale to show to the judge.

 

You are correct in that you are in a difficult situation -

 

- if you are allowed to pay £1700 for the next 5/6 months - not guaranteed and I doubt it would be accepted

 

- give you time to find extra money and/or find a new job - not guaranteed and you would need proof of where the money was coming from/ written job offer.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Ell en on this one web if you think about it,all you may be doing is trying to delay the inevatable.You cannot really enter your n244 form on a judgement that was made a year ago and remember you have defaulted on that agreement,it just wouldnt make sense to challenge the order a year on.You could of course wait for B.M to issue the eviction notice then enter your n244 form using the Elmes case,you could also site Norgen,add to that your own statement,explaining you are in a fixed rate deal with B.M Also add the above issues we have discussed to form your defence pack,then hope to god you get a lender friendly judge.To be honest Web i dont think your chances are great,its a slim chance at best.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...