Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

M6 speed camera catches 5,500 drivers in five weeks


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5205 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

For the likes of a radar gun or mobile camera, does these not have to calibrated? If not calibrated correctly would this not give inaccurate readings?

 

Also to what Bernie_The_Bolt said. Our town has been slated by the local press due to the amount of road signs there are on the roads. One road that runs for around 50 meters has something stupid like 15 road signs on. Gathering the information from the signs and trying to watch what else is going on, your speed etc I honestly do think is a huge distraction. Especially if new to the area.

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

For the likes of a radar gun or mobile camera, does these not have to calibrated? If not calibrated correctly would this not give inaccurate readings?

 

Also to what Bernie_The_Bolt said. Our town has been slated by the local press due to the amount of road signs there are on the roads. One road that runs for around 50 meters has something stupid like 15 road signs on. Gathering the information from the signs and trying to watch what else is going on, your speed etc I honestly do think is a huge distraction. Especially if new to the area.

 

That sounds like a good reason to slow down!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hhhhhmmmmm yeah and have somebody doing 20MPH in a 40. Good reasoning there.

 

Looks like we won't agree on anything. Well lets agree to disagree

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hhhhhmmmmm yeah and have somebody doing 20MPH in a 40. Good reasoning there.

 

Looks like we won't agree on anything. Well lets agree to disagree

 

Why drive at 20mph? You forget that if it's a 40 limit then it's a maximum, not minimum or a target. If 20 is an appropriate speed then yes do 20.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One thought would be that if driving above 50mph in these roadworks was dangerous, how come none of these 5,500 speeding drivers caused an accident?

 

But isn't this where the point gets missed?

 

It isn't that the speeding itself is dangerous it is that if there is an accident (which may be from an external cause eg blowout) the potential for damage and injury is so much greater at higher speeds.

 

This is even more so in roadworks with reduced protection, plant close to the roadway, people on the work space etc.

 

A car travelling at 70mph has about twice the energy to disperse than a car at 50mph. When you get this it is easier to understand why limits are lowered and why they should be followed.

********************************************

Nothing in this post constitutes "advice" which I may not, in any event, be qualified to provide.

The only interpretation permitted on this post (or any others I may have made) is that this is what I would personally consider doing in the circumstances discussed. Each and every reader of this post or any other I may have made must take responsibility for forming their own view and making their own decision.

I receive an unwieldy number of private messages. I am happy to respond to messages posted on open forum but am unable to respond to private messages, seeking advice, when the substance of that message should properly be on the open forum.

Many thanks for your assistance and understanding on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bernie the Bolt wrote

IMHO the only valid argument agains speed cameras is that they are a very blunt tool and have reduced the traffic police on the roads.

 

Inappropriate speed is only one of a range of dangerous issues and the absence of police patrols does nothing to reduce these.

 

This was the point I made at the beginning of the thread.

 

Being the victim in a collision (hit and run) where a speeding unregistered and therefore uninsured and untaxed car struck mine I would like to see a lot more more police on the roads. Although given the registration number, make and model the police could not be bothered to try and trace it as it required too many resources

 

Speed cameras (automatic tax collectors) are a waste of time and money (Swindon Council) and are not effective as once people know where they are they will just slow down for the requisite marked section of the road before speeding up again. Specs cameras are more effective over a distance although the speed some drivers were passing me on the M4 a few days ago makes me wonder if they were driving unregistered vehicles or have a magic coating on the number plates to stop them being read.

Edited by asmodeus
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...