Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OK, all done as requested. Defence left blank for now. Just one small question in relation to the CPR31:14.... Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of [each of the following / the] document(s) mentioned in your Particulars of Claim: and it says * delete if not mentioned in the Particulars of claim. I'm not  sure if I ask for everything or nothing as I can't see any of the list mentioned in the POCs
    • Fund management firm Allan Gray also said giving Nationwide's members a vote on the £2.9 billion buyout would have been 'a much better path'.View the full article
    • A Swiss pressure group says some staff at Shein suppliers are still working excessive overtime.View the full article
    • Let me start by saying I feel tremendous regret, shame and remorse. I have some debt and personal life has fallen apart over the last year which has caused me to be careless. Doesn’t make it okay I know. In a positive way, i will never take anything in life for granted ever again. I want to volunteer and go back to being a good person. I need some advice/reassurance on the below so I can move on better from this experience. A few days ago I was caught at sainsburys, I paid for part of the food (about £5) and didn’t pay for the other (about £8-10) at self checkout. when I got to the exit someone in plain clothes asked to see my receipt and bag and that they worked for mitie. I told him the receipt was in the store bin (true) and he said he followed me round and knows I didn’t pay for all of it. he very sternly but calmly said he just needs my name then I can leave with the shopping. I said i am in a bad day and can’t do this and was on the verge of breaking down. So I handed him the shopping and slowly walked out. No name given (I read elsewhere this is good and makes it unlikely to develop) and I have no way knowing if police contacted. I overthink a lot and I wonder if they can track me via debit card or nectar card on the transaction. I also wonder if they saw me do it last month and have been waiting for me. I know someone who works at their head office and terrified somehow it will get back. I’m also terrified of being recognised in the street.    I don’t know what’s going to happen. I see a lot in the news today about shoplifting 
    • Hi, I’ve just spotted an Arrangement to Pay marker (TransUnion) on my Barclays Mortgage account for 1 month in March 2022. I’ve spoken to Barclays Customer Service and Complaints about this and they’ve given me some background but have closed my complaint: Direct Debit for mortgage bounced in February and I didn’t notice this at the time. Realised there were arrears in March and called customer service straight away. Offered to pay half the arrears on the call with the other half of the arrears the following month. I prob suggested or accepted this as had done that many years previously when I was a poor student with no adverse consequences. Paid in accordance with this. Barclays call notes report they informed me credit reference agencies would be notified and I indicated I understood. However, complaints team couldn’t access the call because it was too old. They advised I could request a transcript through GDPR and complain via ombudsman if still unhappy - I’ll process the GDPR request this week. Whilst it may be factual that I entered into some kind of arrangement regarding the arrears, it wasn’t clear to me that they would be treating it and reporting it as a formal payment plan along with the potential consequences of this. At no point did I agree to or request to “reducing my contractual payments” - I paid my contractual amount for March and April with 50% more on top. I guess it’s likely they did say something vague about credit reference agencies and it’s also possible that I may have agreed without fully understanding it would be different to a late payment marker. I’m not 100% sure of the impact of the AP but I believe it did tighten up balance transfer and new card offers (Lloyds group in particular) even though the rest of my report is spotless and I have many years managing multiple high balance cards. Although it may have been less comfortable, I also believe I had the means to pay the balance in full if I’d realised the impact at the time. Finally, it feels like Ive been penalised for speaking to customer services directly rather than just upping my payments to cover the arrears. Historically, I was under the impression that Barclays mortgages weren’t even reporting arrears of less than 2-3 months as late payments - although this may have changed since the last time I was in arrears. I’ve had a browse through threads about AP markers and it seems like removal is unlikely if it’s deemed factual but it may be worthwhile escalating to FOS or ICO? Will update with transcript details once I’ve raised and received a response to my request. I suppose the upside of this is that I’ll be even more cautious about negative markers in the future. Thanks, J
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Grant V Natwest


chuck2001
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6285 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Well recieved the AQ today will look at in more depth in the New Year. Response date is 15/01.

 

Chuck

GRANT Vs NatWest

 

S.A.R. Sent 22.08.06

S.A.R.s Signed for 23.08.06

Recieved Statements Yr2000-2002 16.09.06

Non Compliance Sent 04.10.06

All Statements Recieved 18.10.06

Prelim Sent 23.10.06

Prelim Recieved 24.10.06

Prelim Reply Recieved 28.10.06

LBA Sent 8.11.06 / LBA Recieved 9.11.06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers once again Michael.

 

Chuck

GRANT Vs NatWest

 

S.A.R. Sent 22.08.06

S.A.R.s Signed for 23.08.06

Recieved Statements Yr2000-2002 16.09.06

Non Compliance Sent 04.10.06

All Statements Recieved 18.10.06

Prelim Sent 23.10.06

Prelim Recieved 24.10.06

Prelim Reply Recieved 28.10.06

LBA Sent 8.11.06 / LBA Recieved 9.11.06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a quick flick through the AQ and have noticed that the form is an N150 and not N149, does it matter? even though the claim is under 5K. Do you think I should querie this with the court as it might be an error on their part.

 

Am I aloud to fill in and use the pdf format form or do I have to use the form supplied?

 

Cheers in advance, no doubt there may be other questions as I don't want to slip up at this late stage.

 

 

Chuck

GRANT Vs NatWest

 

S.A.R. Sent 22.08.06

S.A.R.s Signed for 23.08.06

Recieved Statements Yr2000-2002 16.09.06

Non Compliance Sent 04.10.06

All Statements Recieved 18.10.06

Prelim Sent 23.10.06

Prelim Recieved 24.10.06

Prelim Reply Recieved 28.10.06

LBA Sent 8.11.06 / LBA Recieved 9.11.06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a quick flick through the AQ and have noticed that the form is an N150 and not N149, does it matter? even though the claim is under 5K. Do you think I should querie this with the court as it might be an error on their part.

Doesn't make any difference. With all the claims they've probably run out of N149's

Am I aloud to fill in and use the pdf format form or do I have to use the form supplied?

Either

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 Suitable response here:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-bank/35672-cobbetts-cpr-18-request-7.html#post386449

 

2. Their defence is shorter than some they have submitted, but otherwise entirely standard.

 

I have same kind of defence from Natwest too - it runs to 4 pages and says nothing more than they've not got enough information to submit a proper defence!

 

Sent cpr-18-request response

 

Tinkerbell.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys just a few questions before I submit AQ(N150).

 

1. On page 1 it states my father as the 1st claimant and part 20 cliamant, don't understand the Part 20 bit.

 

2. Section D Case management

Im doing the claim for my dad so do I include myself in here and to what facts am I witness to? My dad doesn't want to appear himself if it came to it.

 

3. Section H Other Information

Do you intend to make any applications in the immediate future?

 

Do I sign the form as im the litigation friend striking through Counsel, Solicitor, 2nd, 3rd and defendant?

 

Finally in other info do I put in their that my father gives me permission to carry out this claim on his behalf?

 

Cheer guys, hopefully thats it.

 

Chuck

GRANT Vs NatWest

 

S.A.R. Sent 22.08.06

S.A.R.s Signed for 23.08.06

Recieved Statements Yr2000-2002 16.09.06

Non Compliance Sent 04.10.06

All Statements Recieved 18.10.06

Prelim Sent 23.10.06

Prelim Recieved 24.10.06

Prelim Reply Recieved 28.10.06

LBA Sent 8.11.06 / LBA Recieved 9.11.06

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. On page 1 it states my father as the 1st claimant and part 20 cliamant, don't understand the Part 20 bit.

Are yiou sur it says this, since Part 20 is about Countercalims by the Defendant.

2. Section D Case management

Im doing the claim for my dad so do I include myself in here and to what facts am I witness to?

No, leave blank.

My dad doesn't want to appear himself if it came to it
.

Even with you as a Litigants friend, your father would have to be present.

3. Section H Other Information

Do you intend to make any applications in the immediate future?

 

No

Do I sign the form as im the litigation friend striking through Counsel, Solicitor, 2nd, 3rd and defendant?

 

Finally in other info do I put in their that my father gives me permission to carry out this claim on his behalf?

Dont't know. Suggest you phone the court for advice.

 

Section F Proposded Directions:

New strategy for Allocation Questionaires

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Michael,

 

cheers again for advice.

 

Are yiou sure it says this, since Part 20 is about Countercalims by the Defendant.

 

Only where the court staff have filled in the details ie

 

To be completed by, or on behalf of,

"Chuck"

who is [1st][2nd][3rd][Claimant][Defendant][Part 20 Claimant] in this claim.

The only boxes that have a pen stroke through are [2nd][3rd] & [Defendant]

Unless its an error on their part, or unless they are going to counter claim.

However im using the pdf template version should I strike it out myself or is it that the AQ they send to the Solicitors whereby they strike it out if they are not going to counter claim.

 

Hope ive explained it alright. Any thoughts much appreciated.

 

Chuck.

GRANT Vs NatWest

 

S.A.R. Sent 22.08.06

S.A.R.s Signed for 23.08.06

Recieved Statements Yr2000-2002 16.09.06

Non Compliance Sent 04.10.06

All Statements Recieved 18.10.06

Prelim Sent 23.10.06

Prelim Recieved 24.10.06

Prelim Reply Recieved 28.10.06

LBA Sent 8.11.06 / LBA Recieved 9.11.06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right got you.

 

So I'll strike through it then

 

Cheers

 

Chuck

GRANT Vs NatWest

 

S.A.R. Sent 22.08.06

S.A.R.s Signed for 23.08.06

Recieved Statements Yr2000-2002 16.09.06

Non Compliance Sent 04.10.06

All Statements Recieved 18.10.06

Prelim Sent 23.10.06

Prelim Recieved 24.10.06

Prelim Reply Recieved 28.10.06

LBA Sent 8.11.06 / LBA Recieved 9.11.06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well nearly there with submitting AQ. Was going to use the new strategy but couldn't think what to use for Statement of evidence as Cobbetts didn't admit to anything ref charges.

 

3. No admissions are made as to what charges have been debited to the Claimant’s account.

 

So thought it prudent to do it the tried and tested way, unless anyone has any idea's about how to draft the statement. AQ deadline is 15.01.07.

 

 

Chuck

GRANT Vs NatWest

 

S.A.R. Sent 22.08.06

S.A.R.s Signed for 23.08.06

Recieved Statements Yr2000-2002 16.09.06

Non Compliance Sent 04.10.06

All Statements Recieved 18.10.06

Prelim Sent 23.10.06

Prelim Recieved 24.10.06

Prelim Reply Recieved 28.10.06

LBA Sent 8.11.06 / LBA Recieved 9.11.06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well today at 1100hrs recieved first offer from Cobbetts for about 50% of claim, haven't even comleted AQ yet.

Now have the job of drafting and sending rejection letter.

 

I feel as though im getting somewhere now.

The old man's out looking for new kitchen units today waiting in anticipation of the big cheque to arrive.

 

 

Chuck

GRANT Vs NatWest

 

S.A.R. Sent 22.08.06

S.A.R.s Signed for 23.08.06

Recieved Statements Yr2000-2002 16.09.06

Non Compliance Sent 04.10.06

All Statements Recieved 18.10.06

Prelim Sent 23.10.06

Prelim Recieved 24.10.06

Prelim Reply Recieved 28.10.06

LBA Sent 8.11.06 / LBA Recieved 9.11.06

Link to post
Share on other sites

There seem to be quite a few offers coming today, think this is the fourth time I've posted this reply......lol

 

Thank you for your letter dated xth January 2007.

 

I respectfully decline your offer of settlement and request, once again, that you return to me all charges imposed on this account, interest and court fees, which together with the daily rate of £0.XX now total £xxxx as of XXth January 2007.

 

I will accept the sum offered only as part settlement and on the clear understanding that I will pursue recovery of the remainder.

 

I will be willing to withdraw my claim upon receipt of unconditional full settlement of my claim.

 

I am also not prepared to agree to any confidentiality clauses you try to impose, unless of course your client wishes to make an offer of due consideration in addition to the amount of £xxxxx, in order to be afforded this privilege by myself.

 

I trust this clarifies my position.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck on the final hurdle chuck.

 

I am at the same stage. In the post yesterday i received an goodwill offer for about 50% of total claim.

 

Sending rejection letter tommorrow.

 

Good luck again, i will keep you posted as to how im getting on.

 

tinkerbell

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well goodwill gesture rejection letter sent today so hopefully no that far now.

 

Lets see what games they play now, going to file AQ on Friday 12th Jan.

 

 

Chuck

GRANT Vs NatWest

 

S.A.R. Sent 22.08.06

S.A.R.s Signed for 23.08.06

Recieved Statements Yr2000-2002 16.09.06

Non Compliance Sent 04.10.06

All Statements Recieved 18.10.06

Prelim Sent 23.10.06

Prelim Recieved 24.10.06

Prelim Reply Recieved 28.10.06

LBA Sent 8.11.06 / LBA Recieved 9.11.06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Need help here guys, don't know whether I have dropped a clanger or not.

 

Recieved AQ from defence today stating:-

 

"We refer the court to the Defendant's Solicitor letter dated 22.12.2006 and respectfully request that this claim be struck out on the basis that the claim form is defective having not been signed by the Claimant personally or by a solicitor acting for him and there being no reason for proposed litigation friend".

 

Im claiming for my dad and when I completed the N1 and submitted it to the court I asked if I could sign the form on his behalf as a litigation friend, they told me this was ok.

 

Have they now got grounds to have the case struck out? or is this another delay tactic. ultimately I know its the judges decision. I was going to submit my dads AQ tomorrow the deadline is Monday, should I still submit or wait for judges decision?

 

Well I thought we were on the home straight, I take it if the judge strikes out the claim I would have to start again from the N1 stage and make sure my dad signs it.

 

Any help much appreciated.

 

 

Chuck

GRANT Vs NatWest

 

S.A.R. Sent 22.08.06

S.A.R.s Signed for 23.08.06

Recieved Statements Yr2000-2002 16.09.06

Non Compliance Sent 04.10.06

All Statements Recieved 18.10.06

Prelim Sent 23.10.06

Prelim Recieved 24.10.06

Prelim Reply Recieved 28.10.06

LBA Sent 8.11.06 / LBA Recieved 9.11.06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bump

 

Any comments guys

 

 

Chuck

GRANT Vs NatWest

 

S.A.R. Sent 22.08.06

S.A.R.s Signed for 23.08.06

Recieved Statements Yr2000-2002 16.09.06

Non Compliance Sent 04.10.06

All Statements Recieved 18.10.06

Prelim Sent 23.10.06

Prelim Recieved 24.10.06

Prelim Reply Recieved 28.10.06

LBA Sent 8.11.06 / LBA Recieved 9.11.06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok,so they've picked up on a technicality. At least it shows they're paying attention!! Basically the mistake was to sign it as a Litigation Friend, since this only applies to children or patients ie people incapable of conducting a case. Which is why they're saying there is no reason for the proposed litigation friend.

 

You should send your AQ in on time, as that is also grounds for a case to be struck out.

 

What I suggest you do is under Other Information explain the circumstances and the fact that you were advised by the court that uou could sign the N1 on your father's behalf. Explain that your father is willing to appear in person at any hearing. Enclose copy of his permission.

 

I think the worst that may happen is that the judge may direct you to serve a corrected N1 or he may well allow it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again for reply Michael, Im not the best at putting things down on paper any chance you could give a rough guide on text to use ie my father will now sign AQ so in other info along with the other text in there "standard disclosure and not a complicated case etc" what should I put now.

Enclose copy of his permission?

 

What a ball ache, everything was going so well, nevermind hopefully the judge will allow it.

 

Chuck

GRANT Vs NatWest

 

S.A.R. Sent 22.08.06

S.A.R.s Signed for 23.08.06

Recieved Statements Yr2000-2002 16.09.06

Non Compliance Sent 04.10.06

All Statements Recieved 18.10.06

Prelim Sent 23.10.06

Prelim Recieved 24.10.06

Prelim Reply Recieved 28.10.06

LBA Sent 8.11.06 / LBA Recieved 9.11.06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Enclose copy of his permission?

I thought he may have originally sent the bank a letter giving permission for you to act on his behalf. Obviously not. Not to worry.

 

Never done this before, so amend as you see fit:

 

The defendant has requested that my claim be struck out on the grounds that that the claim form is defective. My son, Mr XXXX, has been assisting me in my claim, and I wish him to accompany me to any hearing and allow him to be my lay representative.

 

At the time of filing my claim at XXXX County Court, he explained this to the court staff and was advised that it would be in order for him to sign the claim form on my behalf.

 

I therefore respectfully request that my claim be permitted to proceed and that my son, Mr XXX, be allowed to be my lay representative.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...