Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Changes in the US are enticing more people to file bankruptcy to clear their student loans.View the full article
    • Servicing Stop Limited Registered Office Address: 57 London Rd, Enfield, Middlesex, England, EN2 6DU Company Type: Private Limited Company Company Status: Active Company Number: 06558606 Directors: Oliver Joseph Richmond Appointed 8th April 2008, Toby Robert Richmond Appointed 8th September 2009 Companies House Link: SERVICING STOP LIMITED overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK SERVICING STOP LIMITED - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual...   Endole Link: Servicing Stop Limited - Company Profile - Endole SUITE.ENDOLE.CO.UK Servicing Stop Limited is an active company located in Enfield, Greater London. View Servicing Stop Limited profile, shareholders, contacts...  
    • Hi I assume the Loft Conversion with the eaves and crawl space was there when you initially purchased the property. Even in done after purchasing the property and the correct permissions were in place i.e. Local Authority, Land Registry, Freeholder which is Southern Land which would be required as a Leasehold property. The difficulty is if the Loft Conversion was there when you purchased the property and there is no evidence in your documents of the eaves and crawl space due to where the Red Lines stop in the plans or even after purchase it was added this is the reason you are having issues with selling due to those missing Red Lines in the Plans and any other Buyers competent Solicitor would flag this up. I can understand the reasons the Buyer wishes a Deed of Variation probably there Solicitor requesting this to ensure those missing red lines are covered before the Sale as they Flagged this as an issue as Red Lines missing on Plans and want buyer protected. As for the £8000 costs Together and cohort Southern Land are trying to charge have you thought of contacting a few Property Solicitors yourself to get a few quotes. (only mention this because when I research this possible costs can range from £500 - £2000 depending on the Deed of Variation work required and nothing to stop you doing this then approaching Together and cohorts with it) Also ask Together/Southern Land for a breakdown of the £8000 costs for the Deed of Variation. Yup do send both Together and Southern Land a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that data in whether it be emails, written, recorded calls etc. They then have 30 Calendar Days to respond and that time limit only starts once they acknowledge receipt of your SAR Request. When you purchased the property some 17yrs ago are the Solicitors that you went through at that time still operating? (I know probably a silly question but if they are nothing to stop you contacting them and asking them about this especially if the Loft Conversion was in place when you purchased the property) Another link that will be useful to you as Leasehold is The Leasehold Advisory Service: Home - The Leasehold Advisory Service WWW.LEASE-ADVICE.ORG Government funded, independent advice for residential leaseholders and park home residents  
    • Why struggling parents aren't choosing cheaper brands when it comes to infant formula milk.View the full article
    • Musk's profane attack on advertisers baffled experts - without adverts, how would X survive?View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
    • Post in Some advice on buying a used car
    • People are still buying used cars unseen, paying by cash or by bank transfer, relying on brand-new MOT's by the dealer's favourite MOT station….
      It always leads to tears!
      used car.mp4


    • Pizza delivery insurance.mp4




      Parcel delivery insurance 1.mp4
        • Haha
      • 2 replies
  • Recommended Topics

PPI on a personal loan - ADVICE NEEDED PLEASE!!!

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5034 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

Hi guys, I'm really hoping for some advice here. My husband (before we were married) took out a £15k loan from Natwest in 2007. At the time he was running his own business (a limited company). He was flagrantly missold PPI, as he was convinced it was a service charge that he paid every month in case he ran into financial difficulty, and he assumed that he'd just have it removed when he got a regular salaried job. HE NEVER REALISED that it was a lump sum (+ interest!) that was added to his loan amount. Recently we've come into some money and thought about paying it off in full so we checked out the loan agreement and realised what the heck this PPI actually was! So I've been reading your posts and he contacted the

PPI Customer Concerns Team, Regulatory Risk, 5th Floor, 1 Hardman Boulevard, Manchester M3 3AQ.. phone is 0161 755 6890 by phone. They took all the info and told him that he'd hear from them within 8 weeks but that the best he could hope for was a reset of the loan without the PPI but no compensation!

Advice on what we could do next?

Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is extremely unhelpful when you make more than one post on the same problem in different forums. It duplicates the work of the site team. People will be unable to keep up with what is happening when you start receiving different replies on different threads.


Please don't do it

Link to post
Share on other sites

do I understand that even at the time that he was sold the PPI, that he didn't have an insurable interest? In other words, the PPI which he bought at the time was not suitable to his particular circumstances.


When you spoke to them on the telephone, did you record the call?

Link to post
Share on other sites



He and his business partner had set up a consulting firm as a limited company - so effectively he was self employed as his employer (himself) had no redundency scheme etc, so yes that is how i understand it.


when he (husband) spoke to them this morning to initiate a complaint he did not record the call. should he have? i had to force him to make the call as he's so embarassed to have been ripped off!

Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case the money has been paid under a mistake and is entirely recoverable.

Additionally you should be able to claim at least 8% interest pa calculated daily since the beginning of the PPI contributions.


Why are you making phone calls without recording them?

Even the statement made that "..at best ... no compensation " is itself misleading ind unfair. If you had that recorded this itself would give you good leverage to get your money quickly and with less fuss.


People who say that they are going to record their calls in the future are like people who only join the AA after they have broken down on the motorway.

Record your calls.


You have to decide how you want to get your money back.


Slowly - you can complain to the FOS, wait a year or more and then get it all back. Very likely that the FOS will find in your favour.


Quickly, threaten a court claim and then issue the claim for the refund plus interest. You can reckon that they will cave in and that you will have your money back plus interest plus costs in less than 6 weeks.


Maybe your best bet is a compromise.


Get their email address and write to them formally saying that you want your PPI payments back plus interest which you will accept at 8%.


They will probably refund you and tell you that they won't give you the interest because it is not their policy.


Accept the repayments. Pay in the cheque and than go for the interest.

Do not sign any full and final settlement agreements.


I rate your chances of getting your payments as 100%

I rate your chances of getting the interest at better than 90%


Do not go to the FOS under any circumstances. A complete waste of time in your circumstances.


If you get a call recorder, a Truecall, for instance, try calling them and see what you can get them to say to you on the record - for future use.

You do not need to warn them that they are being recorded.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...